Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Calcif Tissue Int ; 73(1): 33-43, 2003 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14506952

ABSTRACT

We report a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label 2-year trial of 81 postmenopausal women aged 53-79 years with at least one minimal-trauma vertebral fracture (VF) and low (T-score below - 2) lumbar bone mineral density (BMD). Group HRT received piperazine estrone sulfate (PES) 0.625 - 1.25 mg/d +/- medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 - 5 mg/d; group HRT/D received HRT plus calcitriol 0.25 microg bd. All with a baseline dietary calcium (Ca) of < 1 g/ d received Ca carbonate 0.6 g nocte. Final data were on 66 - 70 patients. On HRT/D, significant (P < 0.001) BMD increases from baseline by DXA were at total body - head, trochanter, Ward's, total hip, intertrochanter and femoral shaft (% group mean delta 4.2, 6.1, 9.3, 3.7, 3.3 and 3.3%, respectively). On HRT, at these 6 sites, significant deltaS were restricted to the trochanter and Wards. Significant advantages of HRT/D over HRT were in BMD of total body (- head), total hip and trochanter (all P = 0.01). The differences in mean delta at these sites were 1.3, 2.6 and 3.9%. At the following, both groups improved significantly -lumbar spine (AP and lateral), forearm shaft and ultradistal tibia/fibula. The weightbearing, site - specific benefits of the combination associated with significant suppression of parathyroid hormone-suggest a beneficial effect on cortical bone. Suppression of bone turnover was significantly greater on HRT/D (serum osteocalcin P = 0.024 and urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio P = 0.035). There was no significant difference in the number of patients who developed fresh VFs during the trial (HRT 8/36, 22%; HRT/D 4/34, 12% - intention to treat); likewise in the number who developed incident nonvertebral fractures. This is the first study comparing the 2 treatments in a fracture population. The results indicate a significant benefit of calcitriol combined with HRT on total body BMD and on BMD at the hip, the major site of osteoporotic fracture.


Subject(s)
Calcitriol/therapeutic use , Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)/therapeutic use , Estrone/analogs & derivatives , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/prevention & control , Spinal Fractures/prevention & control , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Biomarkers/analysis , Bone Density/drug effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Estrone/therapeutic use , Female , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/drug effects , Humans , Hydroxyproline/urine , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Osteocalcin/blood , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/metabolism , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Treatment Outcome
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 11(1): 43-51, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10663358

ABSTRACT

In a randomized trial involving 71 postmenopausal osteoporotic women with vertebral compression fractures, radiocalcium absorption studies using the (45)Ca single isotope method (alpha) were performed at baseline and after 8 months of treatment with either continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT, as piperazine estrone sulfate 0.625-0.937 mg daily +/- medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg daily depending on uterine status) or HRT plus calcitriol 0. 25 microg twice daily. A calcium supplement of 600 mg nocte was given to only those women who had a daily calcium intake of less than 1 g per day at baseline, as assessed by recalled dietary intake. There was a significant decrease [0.74 (+/- 0.35 SD) to 0.58 (+/- 0. 22), Dalpha = -0.17 (+/- 0.26), p<0.0005] in alpha at 8 months compared with baseline in the HRT-treated group, but a significant increase [0.68 (+/- 0.31) to 0.84 (+/- 0.27), Dalpha = +0.16 (+/- 0. 30), p<0.003] in the HRT-plus-calcitriol treated patients, resulting in alpha being significantly higher after 8 months in the latter group than in the HRT-only group. Although 72% of the patients had been supplemented with calcium between the first and second studies, separate analyses revealed that the change in calcium intake had not affected the result. Further breakdown of the groups into baseline 'normal' absorbers (alpha >/=0.55) and 'malabsorbers' (alpha <0.55) revealed that alpha decreased with HRT treatment only in the normal absorbers, and remained stable in the malabsorbers. Conversely, following HRT plus calcitriol treatment, alpha increased only in the malabsorbers, the normal absorbers in this group remaining unchanged. In conclusion, our data show that HRT, of the type and dose used in this study, did not produce an increase in absorption efficiency; it was in fact associated with a fall. Increased absorption efficiency cannot be achieved unless calcitriol is used concurrently, and then only in patients with malabsorption. Calcitriol also had a significant effect in normal absorbers in that it prevented the decline in alpha seen with HRT alone, and thus should be considered in all patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with HRT.


Subject(s)
Calcitriol/metabolism , Calcium/metabolism , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/methods , Malabsorption Syndromes/metabolism , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/metabolism , Aged , Bone Density/physiology , Calcitriol/administration & dosage , Calcium/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Intestinal Absorption/physiology , Malabsorption Syndromes/complications , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...