ABSTRACT
AIMS: To assess the impact of a multifaceted strategy to improve perioperative diabetes care throughout the hospital care pathway. METHODS: We conducted a controlled before-and-after study in six hospitals. The purpose of the strategy was to target four predominant barriers that obstruct optimal care delivery. We provided feedback on baseline indicator performance, developed a multidisciplinary protocol and patient information, and provided professional education. After a 6-month intervention, we determined the performance changes against three outcome indicators and nine process indicators using data on 811 patients with diabetes who underwent major surgery. The progress of the interventions was monitored closely. RESULTS: Two process indicators improved significantly in the intervention hospitals: the proportion of patients for whom glycaemic control had been evaluated preoperatively increased by 9% (P < 0.002) and the proportion of patients with blood glucose measurements within 1 h after surgery increased by 29% (P < 0.0001). Four other process indicators and all three outcome indicators improved more in the intervention hospitals than in the control hospitals, but the differences were not statistically significant. These included the proportion of patients with all glucose values at 6-10 mmol/l (+3%) and the proportion of patients with hyperglycaemia (-8%). The implementation of the multidisciplinary protocol was still ongoing after the 6-month intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: The multifaceted improvement strategy had a limited impact on the quality of perioperative diabetes care. This study demonstrates the complexity of improving perioperative diabetes care throughout the multiprofessional hospital care pathway.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Perioperative Care/methods , Quality Improvement , Aged , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Clinical Competence , Controlled Before-After Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolism , Disease Management , Feasibility Studies , Female , Health Priorities , Humans , Male , Patient Care Team , Patient Participation , Patient-Centered Care , Perioperative Care/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Success rate of thyroid remnant ablation in patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is commonly based on measurement of serum thyroglobulin levels and 185 MBq (5 mCi) diagnostic 131I scanning or neck ultrasound, performed 6-9 months after ablation. In the present study, we report the rates of successful 131I ablation based on a 5550 MBq (150 mCi) post-therapy scan performed 6-9 months after ablation. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 77 adult patients with DTC, stage T1-T3, N0 or N1, M0, demonstrating thyroid remnant uptake one week after a 2775 MBq (75 mCi) ablation dose. Six to nine months later, all patients received a 5550 MBq dose of 131I, followed by a post- therapy scan after one week. Complete thyroid ablation was defined as no thyroid remnant uptake and a thyroglobulin level < 0.2 µg/l after thyroid hormone withdrawal. RESULTS: Thyroid ablation was complete in 20 patients (26%). Forty-eight patients (62%) demonstrated persistent remnant uptake. This was associated with thyroglobulin levels > 0.2 µg/l in 24/48, and positive thyroglobulin antibodies in 4/48 patients. CONCLUSION: Thyroid remnant ablation success assessed by 5550 MBq post-therapy scanning was much lower than reported in studies evaluating ablation success based on 185 MBq diagnostic 131I scanning or neck ultrasound. The latter techniques may be too inaccurate to detect thyroid remnants and thus may not be sufficiently reliable to predict long-term disease outcome.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Thyroid Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Ablation Techniques/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma/surgery , Female , Humans , Iodine Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Netherlands , Retrospective Studies , Thyroglobulin/blood , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Thyroidectomy , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIMS: Person centredness is an important principle for delivering high-quality diabetes care. In this study, we assess the level of person centredness of current perioperative diabetes care. METHODS: We conducted a survey in six Dutch hospitals, among 690 participants with diabetes who underwent major abdominal, cardiac or large-joint orthopaedic surgery. The survey included questions regarding seven dimensions of person-centred perioperative diabetes care. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained from 298 participants. The survey scores were low for many of the dimensions of person centredness. The dimensions 'information', 'patient involvement' and 'coordination and integration of care' had the lowest scores. Only half the participants had received information about perioperative diabetes treatment, and approximately one-third had received information about the effect of surgery on blood glucose values, target glucose values and glucose measurement times. Similarly, half the participants had an opportunity to ask questions preoperatively, and only one-third of the participants felt involved in the decision-making regarding diabetes treatment. Most participants knew neither the caregiver in charge of perioperative diabetes treatment nor whom to contact in case of diabetes-related problems during their hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Current perioperative diabetes care is characterized by a lack of patient information and limited patient involvement. These results indicate that there is ample room for improving the person centredness of perioperative diabetes care.
