Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
JAMA Dermatol ; 155(6): 694-699, 2019 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30892572

ABSTRACT

Importance: Despite the increasing incidence of chronic cutaneous ulcers (CCUs), limited information exists regarding their incremental economic burden. Objective: To provide nationally representative estimates regarding the incremental health care cost of CCUs, controlling for comorbidities and sociodemographic characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective analysis used 9 years of longitudinal data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS; January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2015). Patients with CCUs were identified using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-produced software that included several codes from the International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision Clinical Modification, for chronic ulcers of the skin. A cross-validated 2-part generalized linear model estimated the adjusted incremental expenditure for individuals with CCUs while controlling for comorbidities and sociodemographic covariates. Data were analyzed from July 1 through September 1, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incremental cost of CCUs, total cost of care, and expenditures associated with inpatient care, outpatient care, prescription medications, emergency department visits, and home health care. Results: A total of 288 698 patients (52.4% female; mean [SD] age, 38.2 [22.4] years) were included, of whom 1786 had CCUs and 286 912 did not. Patients with CCUs were more likely to be female (1078 [60.4%]), non-Hispanic (1388 [77.7%]), previously or currently married (1440 [80.6%]), and covered by Medicaid/Medicare (852 [47.7%]) and had a lower income (954 [53.4%]) when compared with patients without CCUs (P < .001 for all). The mean (SD) annual cost of care per patient with CCUs was greater than 4 times that of patients without CCUs ($17 958 [$1031.90] vs $4373.20 [$48.48]). After controlling for Charlson comorbidity index and sociodemographic factors measured in MEPS, the cost of care for patients with CCUs was 1.73 times as high as that of patients without CCUs (95% CI, 1.53-1.96; P < .001), and patients with CCUs were estimated to incur $7582.00 (95% CI, $6201.47-$8800.45) more in annual health care expenditures. When accounting for the prevalence of CCUs (0.6%), CCUs were associated with more than $16.7 billion per year in population-level US health care expenditures. Among patients with CCUs, mean annual expenditures rose from the 2010-2012 to 2013-2015 periods in association with prescription medications ($3117.26 to $6169.12), outpatient care ($3568.06 to $5920.75), and home health care ($1039.54 to $1670.56). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that chronic cutaneous ulcers are associated with substantial incremental increases in annual health care expenditure. Expenses for patients with CCUs are increasing, particularly with regard to outpatient cost of care and prescription medication expenditure. As health care costs rise, investigators must identify strategies to prevent and treat CCUs.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Skin Ulcer/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care/economics , Chronic Disease , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prescription Drugs/economics , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Skin Ulcer/epidemiology , Skin Ulcer/therapy , United States , Young Adult
2.
Wound Repair Regen ; 24(6): 1081-1088, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27672011

ABSTRACT

The optimal treatment for deep tissue pressure injuries has not been determined. Deep tissue pressure injuries represent a more ominous early stage pressure injury that may evolve into full thickness ulceration despite implementing the standard of care for pressure injury. A longitudinal prospective historical case control study design was used to determine the effectiveness of noncontact low frequency ultrasound plus standard of care (treatment group) in comparison to standard of care (control group) in reducing deep tissue pressure injury severity, total surface area, and final pressure injury stage. The Honaker Suspected Deep Tissue Injury Severity Scale (range 3-18[more severe]) was used to determine deep tissue pressure injury severity at enrollment (Time 1) and discharge (Time 2). A total of 60 subjects (Treatment = 30; Control= 30) were enrolled in the study. In comparison to the control group mean deep tissue pressure injury total surface area change at Time 2 (0.3 cm2 ), the treatment group had a greater decrease (8.8 cm2 ) that was significant (t = 2.41, p = 0.014, r2 = 0.10). In regards to the Honaker Suspected Deep Tissue Injury Severity Scale scores, the treatment group had a significantly lower score (7.6) in comparison to the control group (11.9) at time 2, with a mean difference of 4.6 (t = 6.146, p = 0.0001, r2 = 0.39). When considering the final pressure ulcer stage at Time 2, the control group were mostly composed of unstageable pressure ulcer (57%) and deep tissue pressure injury severity (27%). In contrast, the treatment group final pressure ulcer stages were less severe and were mostly composed of stage 2 pressure injury (50%) and deep tissue pressure injury severity (23%) were the most common at time 2. The results of this study have shown that deep tissue pressure injury severity treated with noncontact low frequency ultrasound within 5 days of onset and in conjunction with standard of care may improve outcomes as compared to standard of care only.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer/therapy , Ultrasonic Therapy/methods , Wound Healing/physiology , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Disease , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pressure Ulcer/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
4.
Int Wound J ; 13(4): 531-9, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26123043

ABSTRACT

Deep tissue injury (DTI) can be difficult to diagnose because many other skin and wound problems can appear as purple skin or rapidly appearing eschar. The diagnosis of DTI begins with a thorough history to account for times of exposure to pressure, such as 'time down' at the scene or time during which the patient was flat and could not respond. Patients with light skin tones present with classic skin discolouration of purple or maroon tissue, a defined border around the area of injury, and often surrounding erythema is evident. Persistent erythema and hyperpigmentation, rather than blanching, should be used to determine pressure injury in dark skin tone patients. Differential diagnosis includes stage 2 pressure ulcers, incontinence-associated dermatitis, skin tears, bruising, haematoma, venous engorgement, arterial insufficiency, necrotising fasciitis and terminal skin ulcers. Many skin problems can also have a purple hue or rapidly developing eschar, and a working knowledge of dermatology is needed.


Subject(s)
Diagnosis, Differential , Erythema , Humans , Pressure Ulcer , Skin , Urinary Incontinence
5.
Int Wound J ; 10(1): 65-72, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22289135

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of non contact low-frequency ultrasound on the healing of suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI). Participants were adults ranging in age from 28 to 93 years old, with multiple diagnoses including anaemia, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Data were examined retrospectively on 85 patients (intervention group = 43 and non intervention group = 42) with 127 SDTI (intervention group = 64 and non intervention group = 63). Participants in both groups received standard of care for treating pressure ulcers. A severity score was used to assess SDTI severity before treatment and healing/progression after treatment. This scale measures surface area, wound colour/tissue assessment, and skin integrity with potential scores of 3 to 18 (higher scores indicate greater severity). A significant difference in changes in wound severity was found (t = 5·67, P < 0.000). Difference in mean change scores was 2·52 on the 3-18 severity scale. The decrease in wound severity for the intervention group was 1·45. Severity in the non intervention group increased by 1·06. This exploratory study of the effect of the non contact low-frequency ultrasound provides initial findings that support its use with SDTI.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer/therapy , Ultrasonic Therapy/methods , Wound Healing , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...