The effect of CYP3A5 and MDR1 polymorphic expression on cyclosporine oral disposition in renal transplant patients.

Variability in CYP3A (CYP3A4/5) and P-glycoprotein (human MDR1 gene product) activity underlies interindividual differences in oral cyclosporine (CsA) bioavailability. Racial differences in polymorphic expression of CYP3A5 and MDR1 may explain observed interracial variability in oral bioavailability. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of CYP3A5 and MDR1 polymorphic expression on CsA oral disposition. Steady-state plasma concentration profiles (n = 19) were sampled in renal transplant recipients receiving concentration-adjusted CsA maintenance therapy. CsA plasma concentrations were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. CYP3A5 and MDR1 genotypes were determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis and nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM) were performed to assess the effect of genotype on CsA pharmacokinetics. MDR1 C3435T genotype was identified as the best predictor of CsA systemic exposure. CsA oral clearance was significantly higher in subjects who carried at least one 3435T allele compared to homozygous wild-type individuals (40.0 +/- 2.2 vs. 26.4 +/- 3.1 L/h, p = 0.007). MDR1 C3435T genotype accounted for 43% of the interindividual variability of CsA oral clearance in the study population after accounting for interoccasion variability. The authors were unable to independently assess whether CYP3A5 correlated with any CsA pharmacokinetic parameter since all CYP3A5 nonexpressors were also 3435T allele carriers. MDR1 3435T allele carriers have enhanced oral clearance compared to individuals with the CC genotype. The frequency of the 3435T allele is lower in African Americans compared to Caucasians. Thus, the MDR1 C3435T genotype offers a potential mechanistic basis to explain interracial differences in CsA oral bioavailability. Further studies are needed to explore the relationship between CYP3A5 and MDR1 genotype and phenotype.

Renal allograft loss as the result of polyomavirus interstitial nephritis after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation: results with kidney retransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus (PV) infection in kidney transplant patients has been reported to cause interstitial nephritis and subsequent graft loss. The cornerstone of current therapy is a reduction in immunosuppression, which can subsequently lead to kidney allograft rejection. This dilemma becomes even more challenging in the setting of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation, because a reduction in immunosuppression may result in rejection of the pancreas allograft. Antiviral therapy has not been shown to be clinically successful in decreasing the risk of graft loss secondary to PV infection. Furthermore, because of limited experience, the decision to perform retransplantation in patients who lost their primary kidney grafts to PV interstitial nephritis becomes a difficult one. METHODS: Retrospective review and case studies. RESULTS: We report two successful living donor kidney retransplants in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant patients who lost their first kidney grafts to PV infection. Both patients are receiving rimantadine therapy and performing well, with functioning kidney and pancreas grafts and no evidence of recurrent PV interstitial nephritis 22 and 37 months after retransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although follow-up is limited, our initial experience would indicate that graft loss secondary to PV interstitial nephritis is not an absolute contraindication for kidney retransplantation.

Thymoglobulin for induction or rejection therapy in pancreas allograft recipients: a single centre experience.

PURPOSE: To review the safety and efficacy of thymoglobulin in pancreas transplant patients receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. METHODS: Retrospective, single centre analysis of 45 patients transplanted between 1995 and 2000 who received 54 courses of thymoglobulin, including 36 courses in 29 solitary pancreas transplant recipients (16 pancreas alone, 13 pancreas after kidney transplants) and 18 courses in 16 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant patients. Thirty-two patients (71%) were primary pancreas transplants, 10 (22%) were second transplants and three (7%) were third transplants. Of the 54 treatment courses, 19 (35%) were for induction, 27 (50%) were for primary rejection and eight (15%) were rescue therapy for rejection. All rejection episodes were biopsy-proven in at least one organ. RESULTS: The median thymoglobulin dose was 1.5 mg/kg/d with a mean of six doses (range 3-10). Dose reduction or interruption was required in 28 courses (52%), most often due to leukopenia (n = 24), fever (n = 2) and thrombocytopenia (n = 2). Thymoglobulin was resumed in all but three patients, two with persistent fever and one with infection. Infectious complications (n = 25) occurred in 17 patients (38%) within 30 days and included bacterial (n = 16), cytomegalovirus (n = 4), polyoma (n = 1), fungal (Candida albicans, n = 1), toxoplasmosis (n = 1) and ehrlichiosis (n = 2). Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease occurred in two patients (4%) at a mean of 70 d post-thymoglobulin treatment. In the 19 patients that received thymoglobulin induction, one simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant, two pancreas alone and four pancreas after kidney transplant recipients developed rejection (37% incidence), while all remaining patients followed by surveillance protocol biopsies were rejection-free. In the 35 patients that received thymoglobulin for rejection, reversal occurred in 26 of the patients (74%). Rejection recurred within 30 d in five patients and post-treatment biopsies revealed persistent rejection in three of 20 pancreas and two of eight renal biopsies. After a mean follow-up of 6 months, the actual patient and pancreas graft survival rates were 93% and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thymoglobulin was effective as induction therapy in high-risk pancreas transplant recipients, and resulted in initial reversal of rejection in 74% of patients. Dose adjustments were required in over half the cases and were usually due to leukopenia. Infections occurring subsequent to thymoglobulin were not uncommon and reflected the immunosuppressive burden of the patient population.

Short-term outcomes of Thymoglobulin induction in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

No data are currently available that describe the clinical outcomes associated with Thymoglobulin (rabbit polyclonal anti-thymocyte globulin) induction in pediatric renal transplant recipients. We report the outcomes of 17 pediatric renal transplant recipients (mean age 10.1+/-5.2 years) transplanted between 1 August 1999 and 31 July 2001. Eleven patients (65%) were Caucasian and 6 (35%) were African-American. Eleven (65%) recipients received cadaveric allografts. Two patients (12%) were second allograft recipients. One patient had primary allograft non-function secondary to vascular thrombosis. Two patients (12%) had delayed allograft function. Immunosuppression consisted of Thymoglobulin induction (mean number of doses 6+/-1.7) with tacrolimus (62%) or cyclosporine A (38%), mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. One year post transplant, patient and graft survival was 100% and 93%, respectively. No acute rejection episodes occurred during the first 6 months after transplantation in any of the recipients. Additionally, no rejection episode occurred among the 14 patients followed for 1 year after transplant. The incidences of asymptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seroconversion at 1 year in seronegative recipients with a seropositive donor were 100% of 4 patients and 0% of 4 patients, respectively. No symptomatic CMV or EBV infections and no post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease have occurred in any patient. These short-term data suggest that Thymogobulin induction is safe and effective in combination with triple immunosuppressive therapy for preventing early rejection in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Impact of hepatitis C virus status in pancreas transplantation: a case controlled study.

Available data suggest that hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+) renal transplant patients may be at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality compared with HCV- patients. Limited data are available regarding the impact of HCV status in pancreas transplant patients. We compared the outcomes of 10 HCV+ patients undergoing pancreas transplantation (seven simultaneous kidney-pancreas, one pancreas after kidney, two pancreas alone) between 1/96 and 10/99 with 20 HCV- recipients that were matched for age, race, gender, timing of transplant, type of pancreas transplant, and surgical technique. Length of follow-up was not significantly different between the HCV+ group compared with the HCV- group (24 +/- 14 vs. 20 +/- 13 months; p=0.45). There was a trend toward a higher incidence of all cause mortality in HCV+ recipients compared with HCV- recipients, 30 vs. 10%, respectively (p=0.17). Additionally, the HCV+ recipients had a trend toward a higher incidence of sepsis-related mortality compared with HCV- recipients, 20 vs. 5%, respectively (p=0.19). Renal allograft survival was 50% in the HCV+ group compared with 94% in the HCV- group (p=0.02). Pancreas allograft survival was not significantly different between the groups, 60 vs. 80%, respectively (p=0.24). At 3, 6, 12 months, and end of follow-up, there were no differences in serum creatinine, amylase, C-peptide, or fasting glucose levels. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of proteinuria at last follow-up in the HCV+ recipients with a renal allograft when compared with HCV- recipients, 50 vs. 12.5%, respectively (p=0.05). In order to maintain comparable glycemic control between the groups, there was a significant increase in oral hypoglycemic requirement in HCV+ recipients compared with HCV- recipients, 33 vs. 0%, respectively (p=0.01). These data suggest that HCV+ pancreas transplant patients may be at an increased risk of graft dysfunction and morbidity. Further studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to fully define the impact of HCV status on pancreas graft survival and function.

Detection of MDR1 single nucleotide polymorphisms C3435T and G2677T using real-time polymerase chain reaction: MDR1 single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping assay.

The objective of this study was to develop a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method to detect MDR1 (human multidrug resistance gene) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) C3435T and G2677T. C3435T and G2677T are linked to MDR1*2, which is associated with enhanced efflux activity in vitro. Using the Smart Cycler, an allele-specific real-time PCR-based genotyping method was developed to detect C3435T and G2677T. The MDR1 genotype of human genomic DNA templates was determined by direct DNA sequencing. PCR reactions for genotyping C3435T and G2677T by using allele-specific primers were conducted in separate tubes. An additional nucleotide mismatch at the third position from the 3' end of each allele-specific primer was used to abrogate nonspecific PCR amplification. The fluorescence emitted by SYBR Green I was monitored to detect formation of specific PCR products. PCR growth curves exceeding the threshold cycle were considered positive. Fluorescence melt-curve analysis was used to corroborate results from PCR growth curves. Using PCR growth curves, our assay accurately determined hetero- and homozygosity for C3435T and G2677T. Genotype assignments based on PCR growth curve, melt-curve analysis, agarose gel electrophoresis, and direct DNA sequencing results of PCR products were in perfect agreement. We have developed a rapid MDR1 genotyping method that can be used to assess the contribution of MDR1*2 to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of P-glycoprotein substrates.