ABSTRACT
To date, life course research in maternal and child health has largely focused on elucidating fetal and early life influences on adult health and less on promoting the health of children with special health care needs (CSHCN). Consideration of life course theory (LCT) for CSHCN is especially important given their increasing prevalence and comorbidity, their disproportionate vulnerability to weaknesses or instability in the health care system, and the growing evidence linking child and adult health and quality of life. In this commentary we seek to advance the consideration of LCT for CSHCN. We (1) briefly summarize key issues and the importance of a life course approach for CSHCN; (2) present illustrative findings from population-based cross-sectional data that serve to generate hypotheses that can be more rigorously examined when population-based longitudinal data become available; and (3) discuss the application of life course principles as a driving force in the continued implementation and improvement of integrated systems of care for CSHCN.
Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Disabled Children/statistics & numerical data , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Social Determinants of Health , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Comorbidity , Female , Health Promotion/standards , Health Surveys , Human Development , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Prevalence , Quality of Health Care/standards , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This article reports findings from the 2005-2006 National Survey of Children With Special Health Care Needs (NS-CSHCN) regarding the extent to which CSHCN have access to public or private health insurance that meets their needs. METHODS: The HRSA Maternal and Child Health Bureau's health insurance core outcome was measured on the basis of whether a child had public or private coverage at the time of survey; continuity of coverage during the previous 12 months; and adequacy of coverage. Bivariate and multivariate statistical methods were used to assess independent predictors of respondents who met the health insurance core outcome and the impact of meeting the core outcome on measures of access and financial burden. Comparisons with a referent sample of children who did and did not have special needs and were included in the 2001 NS-CSHCN are also presented. RESULTS: A total of 62.0% of CSHCN nationally met the health insurance core outcome in 2005-2006, up from 59.6% in 2001. Disparities by ethnicity and income remain, but some have narrowed, especially for Hispanic CSHCN. Children who did not meet the health insurance core outcome were more likely to have unmet needs and their families to experience financial problems. CSHCN were more likely to be insured than children without special needs but less likely to be adequately insured. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the survey demonstrate that although a growing number of CSHCN have continuous and adequate health insurance, additional effort is needed to improve the adequacy of that insurance, particularly for children in vulnerable subpopulations.
