Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Salvage esophagectomy is performed for esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy. The clinical significance and safety of salvage surgery has not been well established. We reviewed 14 cases of salvage esophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy from 1994 through 2005 and investigated complication rates and outcomes. Seven of 14 cases were completely resected with salvage surgery. Operation time and bleeding were greater in patients who experienced incomplete resection (R1/R2). Anastomosis leakage, pulmonary dysfunction and heart failure were recognized in four, two and one patients, respectively. The postoperative complications were more frequent (71.4%) in patients with incomplete resection (R1/R2) than in patients with complete resection (R0) (28.4%). Two patients with complete resection (R0) showed long-term survival. Salvage esophagectomy may be indicated when the tumor can be resected completely after definitive chemotherapy. However, all cases of T4 cancer cannot be resected completely, resulting in a high risk for complications and poor survival.

[Congenital and acquired esophagobronchial fistula].

We report a case of a patient with repeated intractable pneumonia due to congenital and acquired esophagobronchial fistula that was relieved by surgery. The patient was a 69-year-old female, who had repeatedly developed pneumonic symptoms since December 2000. It was found that she had a fistula from an esophageal diverticulum into the right bronchus and was diagnosed with congenital esophagobronchial fistula (Braimbridge classification type I). The patient was not relieved with conservative treatment and the diverticulum and fistula were subsequently excised. Considering the complications, lobectomy was not performed. In postoperative esophagraphy, a second fistula was found at a different site that was then removed during a second surgery. This fistula operation was formed a posteriori based on the conditions around the fistula. We had difficulty with the diagnosis and treatment. However, the patient had a good outcome With surgical treatment. A review of the relevant literature is also presented.

Comparative study between daily and 5-days-a-week administration of oral 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in mice: determining the superior regimen.

BACKGROUND: Oral administration of derivatives of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is currently used to treat colorectal cancer in the United States. Oral chemotherapy possesses certain advantages: it is simple, easy to administer, and has few side effects. We compared conventional daily oral administration of 5-FU (daily schedule) with administration on 5 consecutive days followed by 2 drug-free days (5-days-a-week schedule) in a mouse tumor model. METHODS: The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) in the 5-days-a-week schedule and in the daily schedule were determined in 6-week-old non-tumor-bearing CDF1 male mice. In antitumor experiments, CDF1 mice were inoculated subcutaneously with Colon26 cells (1x10(6) per mouse). Antitumor efficacy was evaluated in terms of the ratio of tumor size in treated to control mice (T/C ratio). RESULTS: The MTD of 5-FU in the 5-days-a-week schedule was 42 mg/kg, and in the daily schedule was 29 mg/kg. In the 5-days-a-week schedule dose escalation nearly 1.4 times that in the daily schedule was possible, although the total dose over 7 days was similar between the two schedules (203 mg/kg and 210 mg/kg, respectively). When the doses of 5-FU were compared under the condition of no body weight loss, the 5-days-a-week schedule produced a comparative dose escalation of 2.1 times per day (from 20 to 42 mg/kg), and 1.5 times per total weekly amount (from 140 to 210 mg/kg) compared to the daily schedule. With regard to the antitumor effect as indicated by the T/C ratio, the 5-days-a-week schedule produced over 70% tumor suppression, whereas the daily schedule produced only 50% suppression at the MTD. Therapeutic efficacy was calculated in terms of the ratio of body weight change to antitumor effect (T/C ratio), and revealed that the MTD of 42 mg/kg 5-FU in the 5-days-a-week schedule produced a therapeutic efficacy almost three times that of the MTD of 29 mg/kg 5-FU in the daily schedule (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using oral administration of 5-FU, we confirmed that the 5-days-a-week schedule allowed dose intensity escalation and was superior to the daily schedule in both enhancement of antitumor effect and protection against adverse effects.

p53 as an indicator of lymph node metastases in invasive early colorectal cancer.

We examined whether overexpression of p53 can be used as a new genetic marker to predict the presence of lymph node metastases of early invasive colorectal cancer. Forty-nine patients with primary colorectal adenocarcinomas invading to the submucosa (sm-CRC) were analyzed and 7 patients were found to have lymph node metastases. Immunostaining was used to detect the p53 overexpression; 43% of sm-CRC stained positive for p53 and all the cancer cells metastasized to lymph nodes were p53 positive. Both lymph node involvement and tumor budding were significantly more frequent in p53 positive than p53 negative tumors (p < 0.05, respectively), and multivariate analysis showed that p53 overexpression constituted a higher relative lisk for lymph node metastases of sm-CRC than either histologic type, level of sm invasion, macroscopic type, tumor budding or vascular invasion, although the difference was not significant (p = 0.086). We concluded that p53 overexpression is a useful biological marker of lymph node metastases of sm-CRC, and that p53 negative status may be an indicator for limited surgery, such as local excision of sm-CRC.