Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 76(6): 1370-1376, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29294354

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the daily food intake rate and the rate of screw loosening between 2 groups of rabbits with mandibular continuity defects: custom implant (CI) group and 5-hole mini-plate group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two types of cylindrical implants were printed, and their physical strength was compared. In this study using rabbits, 1 group (n = 5) received a CI for the reconstruction of a mandibular continuity defect (CI group) and the other group (n = 5) received a 5-hole mini-plate without a bone graft (reconstruction plate [RP] group). After reconstruction, the daily food intake rate and the rate of screw loosening were examined postoperatively. Histologic examination in the CI group was performed 3 months after the operation. RESULTS: The design that mimicked the mandible showed greater physical strength. The amount of time required to achieve 50% recovery was shorter in the CI group than in the RP group (P = .011). The total number of loosened screws in the CI group was lower than that in the RP group at 3 months postoperatively (P = .008). New bone formation in the porous CI was evident in the CI group. CONCLUSIONS: Rabbits with mandibular continuity defects treated with CIs for reconstruction showed faster recovery of the daily food intake rate and fewer loosened screws than those treated with a 5-hole mini-plate without bone graft.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Mandibular Reconstruction , Prosthesis Design , Animals , Rabbits , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Eating , Mandibular Reconstruction/instrumentation , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Prosthesis Failure , Random Allocation , Surgical Mesh
2.
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg ; 39(1): 33, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29159171

ABSTRACT

Dental implants are a common treatment for the loss of teeth. This paper summarizes current knowledge on implant surfaces, immediate loading versus conventional loading, short implants, sinus lifting, and custom implants using three-dimensional printing. Most of the implant surface modifications showed good osseointegration results. Regarding biomolecular coatings, which have been recently developed and studied, good results were observed in animal experiments. Immediate loading had similar clinical outcomes compared to conventional loading and can be used as a successful treatment because it has the advantage of reducing treatment times and providing early function and aesthetics. Short implants showed similar clinical outcomes compared to standard implants. A variety of sinus augmentation techniques, grafting materials, and alternative techniques, such as tilted implants, zygomatic implants, and short implants, can be used. With the development of new technologies in three-dimension and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) customized implants can be used as an alternative to conventional implant designs. However, there are limitations due to the lack of long-term studies or clinical studies. A long-term clinical trial and a more predictive study are needed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...