Ramped versus sniffing position in the videolaryngoscopy-guided tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Ramped positioning is recommended for intubating obese patients undergoing direct laryngoscopy. However, whether the use of the ramped position can provide any benefit in videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation remains unclear. This study assessed intubation time using videolaryngoscopy in morbidly obese patients in the ramped versus sniffing positions. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized study in patients with morbid obesity (n = 82; body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg/m2). Patients were randomly allocated to either the ramped or the standard sniffing position groups. During the induction of general anesthesia, difficulty in mask ventilation was assessed using the Warters scale. Tracheal intubation was performed using a C-MAC® D-Blade videolaryngoscope, and intubation difficulty was assessed using the intubation difficulty scale (IDS). The primary endpoint was the total intubation time calculated as the sum of the laryngoscopy and tube insertion times. RESULTS: The percentage of difficult mask ventilation (Warters scale ≥ 4) was significantly lower in the ramped (n = 40) than in the sniffing group (n = 41) (2.5% vs. 34.1%, P < 0.001). The percentage of easy intubation (IDS = 0) was significantly higher in the ramped than in the sniffing group (70.0% vs. 7.3%, P < 0.001). The total intubation time was significantly shorter in the ramped than in the sniffing group (22.5 ± 6.2 vs. 40.9 ± 9.0, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the sniffing position, the ramped position reduced intubation time in morbidly obese patients and effectively facilitated both mask ventilation and tracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy.

Different intraoperative decisions for undiagnosed paraganglioma: Two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Paragangliomas may be preoperatively misdiagnosed as non-functioning retroperitoneal tumors and are sometimes suspected only at the time of intraoperative manipulation. Without preoperative alpha blockade preparation, a hypertensive crisis during tumor manipulation and hypotension after tumor removal may result in critical consequences. Therefore, primary consideration should be given to the continuation or discontinuation of surgery on the basis of the possibility of gentle surgical manipulation and hemodynamic stabilization. We report two cases of paragangliomas detected intraoperatively. CASE SUMMARY: A 65-year-woman underwent laparoscopic small-bowel wedge resection. A hypertensive crisis occurred during manipulation of the mass, and an unrecognized catecholamine-producing paraganglioma was suspected. The surgeon and anesthesiologists believed that tumor excision could be performed with minimal manipulation of the tumor because the tumor was in a favorable location. Serious hemodynamic instability did not occur with aggressive use of vasoactive drugs. A week later, a 54-year-man underwent open resection of a 3-cm-sized retroperitoneal mass and showed the same findings during mass manipulation. For this patient, continuous manipulation of the mass seemed inevitable due to adhesion between the right adrenal gland and the mass in a narrow surgical field. The surgeon and anesthesiologists decided to cancel the surgical procedure and planned to perform a reoperation after alpha blockade therapy. Two weeks later, the tumor was uneventfully removed with small doses of vasoactive drugs. CONCLUSION: When an undiagnosed paraganglioma is suspected intraoperatively, reoperation after adequate preparation should be considered as an option to avoid fatal outcomes.

Comparisons of surgical conditions of deep and moderate neuromuscular blockade through multiple assessments and the quality of postoperative recovery in upper abdominal laparoscopic surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on surgical field conditions through multiple assessments during pneumoperitoneum and evaluate the effect of the depth of intraoperative NMB on the quality of postoperative recovery over multiple time periods. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Operating room of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty non-morbidly obese patients (ASA physical status 1-2) who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gastrectomy in the reverse Trendelenburg position. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated to either the deep or moderate NMB group. The depth of NMB was maintained at a post-tetanic count of 1 for deep NMB with a continuous infusion of rocuronium and at a train-of-four count of 1 for moderate NMB with a small intermittent bolus of cisatracurium. MEASUREMENTS: Single-blinded scoring of the quality of the surgical field condition was performed by a surgeon using a five-point scale in a 15-min interval during pneumoperitoneum. The quality of postoperative recovery was assessed using the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PostopQRS) on the day before surgery (baseline) and 1 h, 1 day, and 6 days after surgery. MAIN RESULTS: Optimal surgical field condition was rated in 87.0% (449/516) and 72.3% (370/512) of all measurements during deep and moderate NMB, respectively (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients maintaining a good-to-optimal condition throughout pneumoperitoneum was higher in the deep NMB group than in the moderate NMB group. There were no significant differences in the percentage of recovered patients between the two groups for all domains and all timepoints. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple assessments of the surgical field condition demonstrated that deep NMB provided a more satisfactory surgical field condition than moderate NMB during laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, the quality of postoperative recovery, assessed using the PostopQRS, was not different between the two groups according to the depth of NMB.