Variables affecting the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of ICDAS for occlusal caries diagnosis in permanent molars.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess the validity and reproducibility of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) in detecting occlusal caries in permanent molars and to investigate variables that can affect the reproducibility of ICDAS. METHODS: Five experienced, trained, and calibrated investigators examined the occlusal surfaces of 142 extracted permanent molars, ranging from sound to cavitated dentine caries. All visual examinations were conducted under standard conditions. Examinations were repeated after a period of 1 and 3 months from the initial examination. After all examinations were completed, teeth were sectioned and histologic validation was undertaken. Maximum kappa statistics were used to assess bias among examiners and linear weighted kappa was used to assess inter- and intra-examiners' reproducibility. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were obtained at D3 threshold. RESULTS: Differences in the marginal homogeneity were observed for the general dentist. Kappa for intra-examiner reproducibility ranged between 0.66 and 0.81 and the inter-examiner reproducibility ranged between 0.42 and 0.75. ICDAS score of ≥3 presented the best Spearman's correlation coefficient (0.69) at Downer's histologic classification D3. Corresponding sensitivity and specificity values at that level were 0.73 and 0.95, respectively. While variables like the interval of time between teeth examinations did not affect the intra-examiner reproducibility, examiners' specialty influenced inter-examiner's reproducibility over time. CONCLUSIONS: ICDAS presented acceptable intra-examiners reproducibility in detecting occlusal caries over time. However, there was a clear effect for examiner's specialty and clinical experience on the inter-examiner's reproducibility of the ICDAS system at different time intervals.

Self-reported oral hygiene habits and oral health problems of Kuwaiti adults.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to examine self-reported oral hygiene habits and oral health problems of a sample of adult Kuwaitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self-administered, anonymous, structured questionnaire was distributed to 2,400 adult Kuwaiti nationals from all 6 governates of Kuwait assessing socio-demographic variables, oral hygiene habits, and oral health problems. RESULTS: Of the 2,400 questionnaires, 1,925 (80.25%) responded. Of these, 62% reported brushing their teeth at least twice daily, while daily use of dental floss was uncommon (11.8%). Adequate toothbrushing habits were significantly associated with female gender, educational level, non-smoking status, and history of recent preventive dental visits (p = 0.001). The majority of subjects reported multiple oral health problems (64.7% with 2 or more and 41.8% with 3 or more). Factors associated with multiple oral health complaints included younger age, smoking, not having a recent preventive dental visit, and brushing the teeth less than twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: Less than two-thirds of the sampled adult Kuwaitis followed the recommended toothbrushing frequency of twice daily or more, and the majority of subjects have not had a preventive dental visit in the previous 6 months. Furthermore, most subjects reported multiple oral health problems that are mostly preventable through adequate oral hygiene habits and regular preventive dental visits.

Dental patient awareness of smoking effects on oral health: Comparison of smokers and non-smokers.

OBJECTIVES: The negative effects of cigarette smoking on oral health are well established, yet few studies assessed patient awareness of such effects. The aim of this study was to examine differences in dental patient knowledge and awareness of the effects of smoking on oral health between smokers and non-smokers. METHODS: Adult patients from 12 dental centers in Kuwait were asked to complete a 14-point self-administered structured questionnaire on the effects of smoking on oral health in this cross-sectional survey. Significant associations between oral health knowledge, smoking status, and sociodemographic variables were examined with univariate analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1012 subjects participated (response rate = 84.3%). The prevalence of smoking was 29.3%. Fewer smokers than non-smokers thought that oral health and smoking are related (92.2% vs. 95.8%; P = 0.020), and that smoking affected oral cancer (52.4% vs. 66.8%; P < 0.001), periodontal health (72% vs. 78%; P = 0.040), or tooth staining (86.1% vs. 90.9%; P = 0.018). Logistic regression analysis showed smokers to be significantly less aware of the oral health effects of smoking than non-smoking patients (OR=1.51; 95% CI: 1.05-2.16; P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Smoking dental patients are significantly less aware of the oral health effects of smoking than non-smokers. Comparative studies in other populations may be warranted to ascertain the validity of these results.