Implementing guidelines on acute maxillary sinusitis in general practice--a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Management of acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS) is not optimal; antibiotics are often prescribed for viral sinusitis, which leads to many problems including those with antimicrobial resistance. Guidelines have been proposed as a means to change the professional practices. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study whether a nationwide guidelines implementation programme has an effect on the management of AMS in primary care. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized controlled trial was conducted in 30 health centres (HCs) covering a population of 819 777 people from 1998 to 2002. The participating HCs were randomized to implement guidelines either according to a problem-based learning (PBL) or an academic detailing (AD) method facilitated by local GPs. Data were gathered during 1 week in November in all study years and also from external control HCs in 2002. The main outcome measure was compliance with the key points of AMS management in national Current Care guidelines. RESULTS: Implementation of guidelines produced minor changes towards the recommended practices in the management of AMS. Use of the first-line drug amoxicillin increased slightly (from 39% to 48% in AD centres and from 33% to 45% in PBL centres, controls 40%). Proportion of courses of antibiotics with recommended duration increased in MIKSTRA study centres (from 34% to 40% in AD centres and from 32% to 47% in PBL centres, controls 43%). CONCLUSIONS: A nationwide guidelines implementation project produced modest changes in the management of AMS. There were no significant differences between AD and PBL education methods. Less than half the HCs were able to realize the project as intended, which decreases the internal validity of the study. The guidelines implementation might have benefited of more focussed targets and approaches that took into account the problems and practices of each HC.

Prescription rates and diagnostic patterns are stable: a comparison of high-, medium- and low-prescribing primary care physicians treating community-acquired respiratory tract infections.

The objective was to study prescription practices of primary care physicians in prescribing antibiotics for community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Design was time series analysis and cross-sectional survey. The setting was 30 community primary health care centres. A case report form was completed for 3478 patient consultations treated by 198 office-based primary care physicians. Main outcome measures were: classification of diagnoses of respiratory tract infections made by each physician; number of antibiotic prescriptions related to these diagnoses; each physician's mean weekly number of antibiotic prescriptions during 6 months before and after the survey. Patients' risk (odds ratio: OR) to receive an antibiotic prescription from the high and medium prescribers was 5.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.85-6.96) and 2.41 (95% CI 2.04-2.86), compared to low prescribers. High and medium prescribers made more diagnoses of otitis media (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.70-2.53 and 1.85, 95% CI 1.51-2.26, respectively) and fewer diagnoses of unspecified upper respiratory tract infection (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.26-0.38 and 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.68, respectively) than low prescribers. The rank of the prescription rate of high, medium and low prescriber groups remained the same for all diagnoses except pneumonia. In addition, the annual rank between high, medium and low prescriber groups remained stable; high group prescribed more antibiotics during the year than medium group, which prescribed more than low prescriber group.

Management of acute maxillary sinusitis in Finnish primary care. Results from the nationwide MIKSTRA study.

OBJECTIVES: To study the management of acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS) in Finnish primary care and to compare it both to recommendations in national guidelines and to the management of other upper respiratory tract infections (URTI). DESIGN: A cross-sectional multi-centre epidemiological survey. SETTING: Thirty primary care health centres in Finland. SUBJECTS: 7284 patients with symptoms of possible acute rhinosinusitis during one week in both November 1998 and November 1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Symptoms and their duration, use of diagnostic tools, choice of antibiotics, patient outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1601 patients were diagnosed as having AMS (12% of all patients with infectious disease). In 45% of cases the differentiation between AMS and URTI was based on clinical examination alone. Sinus ultrasound was the most common diagnostic tool used (38%). Sinus radiography or blood tests (CRP or leukocytes) were both studied in 8% of cases. AMS was diagnosed and treated with antibiotics also in the early stages of URTI when viruses are the most likely explanation. In total, 83% of patients with AMS received a prescription for antibiotics; the most common choice was amoxycillin (37%), doxycycline was used in 29% of cases, and macrolides in 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics are prescribed for AMS 2 to 5 times more often than true disease incidence would suggest in Finland. The choice of antibiotics follows the guideline recommendations; however, use of macrolides is higher than recommended. Physicians feel strong pressure from patients to prescribe antibiotics for AMS. Primary care physicians need better support in the accurate diagnosis of AMS.