Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 31(4): 779-783, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33211234

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The utilization of aspirin for VTE prophylaxis following TJA has increased due to updated clinical practice guidelines. Aspirin is the only approved VTE prophylaxis medication that does not require a prescription, but adherence and tolerance remain unknown. We hypothesized decreased patient compliance utilizing full-strength 325 mg aspirin twice daily following TJA when compared to low-dose 81 mg twice daily. We also investigated the reasons why patients may elect to stop the medication earlier than 28 days. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty utilizing 325 or 81 mg of EC aspirin twice daily for 4 weeks were surveyed to determine compliance with use and any adverse events related to the medication. Fisher's exact test was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: 404 patients were enrolled with 199 patients prescribed the 325 mg regimen. Fifty-two patients who were prescribed 325 mg missed a dose versus 51 patients who were prescribed 81 mg (p = 0.082). No significant difference in the frequency of missed doses (missing < 5 doses, 5-10 doses, > 10 doses) between the treatment regimens (p = 0.78, 0.39 and 0.83, respectively). Most commonly cited reason for stopping aspirin in both treatment groups was gastrointestinal issues (10.5% and 7%, respectively). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: By surveying patients on their use of aspirin we find no difference in adherence between full-strength and low-dose treatment regimens. Additionally, we have a better understanding of the reasons for noncompliance as GI upset was a relatively common complaint with both doses.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Venous Thromboembolism , Anticoagulants , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Aspirin/adverse effects , Humans , Patient Compliance , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control
2.
JAMA Surg ; 154(1): 65-72, 2019 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30347089

ABSTRACT

Importance: There has been significant debate in the surgical and medical communities regarding the appropriateness of using aspirin alone for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Objective: To determine the acceptability of aspirin alone vs anticoagulant prophylaxis for reducing the risk of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing TKA. Design, Setting, and Participants: Noninferiority study of a retrospective cohort of TKA cases submitted to the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative at 29 member hospitals, ranging from small community hospitals to large academic and nonacademic medical centers in Michigan. The study included 41 537 patients who underwent primary TKA between April 1, 2013, and October 31, 2015. Clinical events were monitored for 90 days after surgery. Data were analyzed between September and October 2016. Exposures: The method of pharmacologic prophylaxis: neither aspirin nor anticoagulants for 668 patients (1.6%), aspirin only for 12 831 patients (30.9%), anticoagulant only (eg, low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, and Xa inhibitors) for 22 620 patients (54.5%), and both aspirin/anticoagulant for 5418 patients (13.0%). Most patients were also using intermittent pneumatic compression stockings. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary composite outcome was the first occurrence of VTE or death. The noninferiority margin was specified as 0.3. The secondary outcome was bleeding events. Results: Of the 41 537 patients, 14 966 were men (36%), and the mean age was 65.8 years. A VTE event occurred in 573 of 41 537 patients (1.38%); 32 of 668 (4.79%) who received no pharmacologic prophylaxis, 149 of 12 831 (1.16%) treated with aspirin alone, 321 of 22 620 (1.42%) with anticoagulation alone, and 71 of 5418 (1.31%) prescribed both aspirin and anticoagulation. Aspirin only was noninferior for the composite VTE outcome compared with those receiving other chemoprophylaxis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.68-1.07, P for inferiority = .007). Bleeding occurred in 457 of 41 537 patients (1.10%), 10 of 668 (1.50%) without prophylaxis, 116 of 12 831 (0.90%) in the aspirin group, 258 of 22 620 (1.14%) with anticoagulation, and 73 of 5418 (1.35%) of those receiving both. Aspirin alone was also noninferior for bleeding complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-1.00, P for inferiority <.001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of patients undergoing TKA, aspirin was not inferior to other anticoagulants in the postoperative rate of VTE or death. Aspirin alone may provide similar protection from postoperative VTE compared with other anticoagulation treatments.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Registries , Retrospective Studies
3.
Orthopedics ; 40(4): e628-e635, 2017 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28437546

ABSTRACT

The quality of care delivered by orthopedic surgeons continues to grow in importance. Multiple orthopedic programs, organizations, and committees have been created to measure the quality of surgical care and reduce the incidence of medical adverse events. Structured root cause analysis and actions (RCA2) has become an area of interest. If performed thoroughly, RCA2 has been shown to reduce surgical errors across many subspecialties. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has a new mandate for programs to involve residents in quality improvement processes. Resident engagement in the RCA2 process has the dual benefit of educating trainees in patient safety and producing meaningful changes to patient care that may not occur with traditional quality improvement initiatives. The RCA2 process described in this article can provide a model for the development of quality improvement programs. In this article, the authors discuss the history and methods of the RCA2 process, provide a stepwise approach, and give a case example. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e628-e635.].


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Orthopedics/standards , Quality Improvement , Accreditation , Humans , Internship and Residency , Orthopedics/education , Patient Safety , Physicians , Root Cause Analysis
4.
J Hand Surg Am ; 42(6): 479.e1-479.e4, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28259566

ABSTRACT

The use of low-dose epinephrine in hand surgery has made it possible to perform a wide range of surgical procedures in the office setting. Low-dose epinephrine use is safe, and its vasoconstrictive effects are reversible with phentolamine. In this report, we present late-onset finger ischemia beginning 3 hours after an ipsilateral carpal tunnel and A1 pulley release of the middle finger anesthetized with local anesthetic and low-dose epinephrine (1:100,000). Finger ischemia lasted 14 hours until rescued with phentolamine injection.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Epinephrine/adverse effects , Fingers/blood supply , Ischemia/etiology , Phentolamine/therapeutic use , Vasoconstrictor Agents/adverse effects , Aged , Anesthetics, Local , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/surgery , Female , Humans , Ischemia/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/etiology
5.
Orthopedics ; 40(2): 102-106, 2017 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27841930

ABSTRACT

Accurate sagittal alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty is crucial for prosthesis longevity, improved function, and patient satisfaction. However, there is variation in the techniques used to attain optimal sagittal femoral component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Femoral component flexion in imageless navigation is based on the mechanical axis rather than the distal femoral anatomy, and there is significant variability in the anatomy of the distal femur. The purpose of this study was to accurately determine the mean distal femoral flexion angle of a representative population and whether variability of the distal femoral flexion angle correlates with race, femur length, or radius of curvature. The mean degree of distal femoral flexion was determined by assessing distal femoral anatomy on computed tomography scans of paired femurs of 1235 patients without evidence of previous fracture, deformity, or surgical implants. The mean±SD distal femoral flexion angle was 2.90°±1.52°, with 80.2% of knees within 3°±2°. Therefore, placing the component in 3° of flexion from the mechanical axis would attain a satisfactory position in most cases. However, further analysis of the patient data revealed 11.4% of Asians, 7.3% of African Americans, and 8.3% of whites had a distal femoral flexion angle greater than 5°. Additionally, the data revealed a moderately strong negative correlation between the distal femoral flexion and the overall radius of curvature of the femur. This preliminary study highlights the need for improved methods for selecting femoral component position in the sagittal plane when using navigation for total knee arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):102-106.].


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Femur/anatomy & histology , Knee Joint/anatomy & histology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Ethnicity , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/surgery , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Knee Prosthesis , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , White People
6.
Patient Saf Surg ; 10: 20, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27688807

ABSTRACT

Providing quality patient care is a basic tenant of medical and surgical practice. Multiple orthopaedic programs, including The Patient Safety Committee of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), have been implemented to measure quality of surgical care, as well as reduce the incidence of medical errors. Structured Root Cause Analysis (RCA) has become a recent area of interest and, if performed thoroughly, has been shown to reduce surgical errors across many subspecialties. There is a paucity of literature on how the process of a RCA can be effectively implemented. The current review was designed to provide a structured approach on how to conduct a formal root cause analysis. Utilization of this methodology may be effective in the prevention of medical errors.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...