Risk of Adverse Outcomes Associated With Cardiac Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Schemes.

BACKGROUND: Multiple cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) diagnostic schemes have been published. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the association of different CS diagnostic schemes with adverse outcomes. The diagnostic schemes evaluated were 1993, 2006, and 2017 Japanese criteria and the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society criteria. METHODS: Data were collected from the Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium, an international registry of CS patients. Outcome events were any of the following: all-cause mortality, left ventricular assist device placement, heart transplantation, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the association of outcomes with each CS diagnostic scheme. RESULTS: A total of 587 subjects met the following criteria: 1993 Japanese (n = 310, 52.8%), 2006 Japanese (n = 312, 53.2%), 2014 Heart Rhythm Society (n = 480, 81.8%), and 2017 Japanese (n = 112, 19.1%). Patients who met the 1993 criteria were more likely to experience an event than patients who did not (n = 109 of 310, 35.2% vs n = 59 of 277, 21.3%; OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.38-2.90; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients who met the 2006 criteria were more likely to have an event than patients who did not (n = 116 of 312, 37.2% vs n = 52 of 275, 18.9%; OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.74-3.71; P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant association between the occurrence of an event and whether a patient met the 2014 or the 2017 criteria (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.85-2.27; P = 0.18 or OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.97-2.33; P = 0.067, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CS patients who met the 1993 and the 2006 criteria had higher odds of adverse clinical outcomes. Future research is needed to prospectively evaluate existing diagnostic schemes and develop new risk models for this complex disease.

Unipolar voltage mapping in right ventricular cardiomyopathy: pitfalls, solutions and advantages.

AIMS: Endocardial unipolar and bipolar voltage mapping (UVM/BVM) of the right ventricle (RV) are used for transmural substrate delineation. However, far-field electrograms (EGMs) and EGM changes due to injury current may influence automatically generated UVM. Epicardial BVM is considered less accurate due to the impact of fat thickness (FT). Data on epicardial UVM are sparse. The aim of the study is two-fold: to assess the influence of the manually corrected window-of-interest on UVM and the potential role of epicardial UVM in RV cardiomyopathies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients who underwent endo-epicardial RV mapping with computed-tomography (CT) integration were included. Mapping points were superimposed on short-axis CT slices and correlated with local FT. All points were manually re-analysed and the window-of-interest was adjusted to correct for false high unipolar voltage (UV). For opposite endo-epicardial point-pairs, endo-epicardial bipolar voltage (BV) and UV were correlated for different FT categories. A total of 3791 point-pairs of 33 patients were analysed. In 69% of endocardial points and 63% of epicardial points, the window-of-interest needed to be adjusted due to the inclusion of far-field EGMs, injury current components, or RV-pacing artifacts. The Pearson correlation between corrected endo-epicardial BV and UV was lower for point-pairs with greater FT; however, this correlation was much stronger and less influenced by fat for UV. CONCLUSION: At the majority of mapping sites, the window-of-interest needs to be manually adjusted for correct UVM. Unadjusted UVM underestimates low UV regions. Unipolar voltage seems to be less influenced by epicardial fat, suggesting a promising role for UVM in epicardial substrate delineation.

Outcomes Associated With Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Importance: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with high mortality in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), and medical management of CS-associated VT is limited by high failure rates. The role of catheter ablation has been investigated in small, single-center studies. Objective: To investigate outcomes associated with VT ablation in patients with CS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study from the Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium registry (2003-2019) included 16 tertiary referral centers in the US, Europe, and Asia. A total of 158 consecutive patients with CS and VT were included (33% female; mean [SD] age, 52 [11] years; 53% with ejection fraction [EF] <50%). Exposures: Catheter ablation of CS-associated VT and, as appropriate, medical treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Immediate and short-term outcomes included procedural success, elimination of VT storm, and reduction in defibrillator shocks. The primary long-term outcome was the composite of VT recurrence, heart transplant (HT), or death. Results: Complete procedural success (no inducible VT postablation) was achieved in 85 patients (54%). Sixty-five patients (41%) had preablation VT storm that did not recur postablation in 53 (82%). Defibrillator shocks were significantly reduced from a median (IQR) of 2 (1-5) to 0 (0-0) in the 30 days before and after ablation (P < .001). During median (IQR) follow-up of 2.5 (1.1-4.9) years, 73 patients (46%) experienced VT recurrence and 81 (51%) experienced the composite primary outcome. One- and 2-year rates of survival free of VT recurrence, HT, or death were 60% and 52%, respectively. EF less than 50% and myocardial inflammation on preprocedural 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were significantly associated with adverse prognosis in multivariable analysis for the primary outcome (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.37-3.64; P = .001 and HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.31-6.55; P = .009, respectively). History of hypertension was associated with a favorable long-term outcome (adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.92; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this observational study of selected patients with CS and VT, catheter ablation was associated with reductions in defibrillator shocks and recurrent VT storm. Preablation LV dysfunction and myocardial inflammation were associated with adverse long-term prognosis. These data support the role of catheter ablation in conjunction with medical therapy in the management of CS-associated VT.

The precordial R' wave: A novel discriminator between cardiac sarcoidosis and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with right ventricular (RV) involvement can mimic arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Histopathological differences may result in disease-specific RV activation patterns detectable on the 12-lead electrocardiogram. Dominant subepicardial scar in ARVC leads to delayed activation of areas with reduced voltages, translating into terminal activation delay and occasionally (epsilon) waves with a small amplitude. Conversely, patchy transmural RV scar in CS may lead to conduction block and therefore late activated areas with preserved voltages reflected as preserved R' waves. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distinct terminal activation patterns in precordial leads V1 through V3 as a discriminator between CS and ARVC. METHODS: Thirteen patients with CS affecting the RV and 23 patients with gene-positive ARVC referred for ventricular tachycardia ablation were retrospectively included in a multicenter approach. A non-ventricular-paced 12-lead surface electrocardiogram was analyzed for the presence and the surface area of the R' wave (any positive deflection from baseline after an S wave) in leads V1 through V3. RESULTS: An R' wave in leads V1 through V3 was present in all patients with CS compared to 11 (48%) patients with ARVC (P = .002). An algorithm including a PR interval of ≥220 ms, the presence of an R' wave, and the surface area of the maximum R' wave in leads V1 through V3 of ≥1.65 mm2 had 85% sensitivity and 96% specificity for diagnosing CS, validated in a second cohort (18 CS and 40 ARVC) with 83% sensitivity and 88% specificity. CONCLUSION: An easily applicable algorithm including PR prolongation and the surface area of the maximum R' wave in leads V1 through V3 of ≥1.65 mm2 distinguishes CS from ARVC. This QRS terminal activation in precordial leads V1 through V3 may reflect disease-specific scar patterns.

The harm of delayed diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiac sarcoidosis: a case series.

AIMS: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a known cause of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, an arrhythmogenic presentation may not prompt immediate comprehensive evaluation. We aimed to assess the diagnostic and disease course of patients with arrhythmogenic cardiac sarcoidosis (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Leiden VT-ablation-registry, consecutive patients with CS as underlying aetiology were retrospectively included. Data on clinical presentation, time-to-diagnosis, cardiac function, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients were divided in early (<6 months from first cardiac presentation) and late diagnosis. After exclusion of patients with known causes of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), 15 (12%) out of 129 patients with idiopathic NICM were ultimately diagnosed with CS and included. Five patients were diagnosed early; all had early presentation with VTs. Ten patients had a late diagnosis with a median delay of 24 (IQR 15-44) months, despite presentation with VT (n = 5) and atrioventricular block (n = 4). In 6 of 10 patients, reason for suspicion of ACS was the electroanatomical scar pattern. In patients with early diagnosis, immunosuppressive therapy was immediately initiated with stable cardiac function during follow-up. Adversely, in 7 of 10 patients with late diagnosis, cardiac function deteriorated before diagnosis, and in only one cardiac function recovered with immunosuppressive therapy. Six (40%) patients died (five of six with late diagnosis). CONCLUSION: Arrhythmogenic cardiac sarcoidosis is an important differential diagnosis in NICM patients referred for VT ablation. Importantly, the diagnosis is frequently delayed, which leads to a severe disease course, including irreversible cardiac dysfunction and death. Early recognition, which can be facilitated by electroanatomical mapping, is crucial.

Electroanatomical Voltage Mapping to Distinguish Right-Sided Cardiac Sarcoidosis From Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the value of electroanatomical voltage mapping (EAVM) to distinguish cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) from arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in patients with ventricular tachycardia from the right ventricle (RV). BACKGROUND: CS can mimic ARVC. Because scar in ARVC is predominantly subepicardial, this study hypothesized that the relative sizes of endocardial low bipolar voltage (BV) to low unipolar voltage (UV) areas may distinguish CS from ARVC. METHODS: Patients with CS affecting the RV (n = 14), patients with gene-positive ARVC (n = 13), and a reference group of patients without structural heart disease (n = 9) who underwent RV endocardial EAVM were included. RV region-specific BV and UV cutoffs were derived from control subjects. In CS and ARVC, segmental involvement was determined and low-voltage areas were measured, using <1.5 mV for BV and <3.9 mV, <4.4 mV, and <5.5 mV for UV. The ratio between low BV and low UV area was calculated generating 3 parameters: Ratio3.9, Ratio4.4 and Ratio5.5, respectively. RESULTS: In control subjects, BV and UV varied significantly among RV regions. The basal septum was involved in 71% of CS patients and in none of ARVC patients. Ratio5.5 discriminated CS from ARVC the best. An algorithm including Ratio5.5 ≥0.45 and basal septal involvement identified CS with 93% sensitivity and 85% specificity. This was validated in a separate population (CS [n = 6], ARVC [n = 10]) with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: EAVM provides detailed information about scar characteristics and scar distribution in the RV. An algorithm combining Ratio5.5 (area BV <1.5 mV/area UV <5.5 mV) and bipolar basal septal involvement allows accurate diagnosis of (isolated) CS in patients presenting with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia from the RV.

Advancement in cardiac imaging for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease.

Over the last decades, substrate-based approaches to ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation have evolved into an important therapeutic option for patients with various structural heart diseases (SHD) and unmappable VT. The well-recognized limitations of conventional electroanatomical mapping (EAM) to delineate the complex 3D architecture of scar, and the potential capability of advanced cardiac imaging technologies to provide adjunctive information, have stimulated electrophysiologists to evaluate the role of imaging to improve safety and efficacy of catheter ablation. In this review, we summarize the histological differences between SHD aetiologies related to monomorphic sustained VT and the currently available data on the histological validation of cardiac imaging modalities and EAM to delineate scar and the arrhythmogenic substrate. We review the current evidence of the value provided by cardiac imaging to facilitate VT ablation and to ultimately improve outcome.