ABSTRACT
Introduction: The operator protection factor (OPF) of four biological safety cabinets (BSCs) has been measured under standard and suboptimal conditions. Methods: The OPF for one BSC1, two BSC2, and an acid-fast bacilli staining station (AFBSS) was measured using the potassium iodide method for in situ testing of BSCs (CEN12469) over a range of inflow velocities under standard conditions and with common interfering factors (fans, opening doors, and walk pasts). Results: The BSC1 and the AFBSS gave a high level of protection under standard test conditions at all airflows (down to 0.3 and 0.38 m/s, respectively). During interfering processes, the BSC1 and AFBSS gave a high level of protection (OPF >105) at the specified inward airflow. At lower airflows, there was a predictable deterioration in performance. There was a significant difference in performance between the two BSC2s tested, with one model passing all tests under all interfering conditions at all airflows. The second BSC2 failed the standard test at the lowest airflow and provided poor levels of protection (OPF <105) in all tests carried out with interfering processes. Conclusion: Although BSC2s are capable of giving a high level of performance, this is design dependent and the BSC1 and AFBSS give a more predictable level of performance due to their simpler design. In environments where BSC certification is not possible, they may provide more robust and sustainable primary containment.
ABSTRACT
Background: Modern microbiology laboratories are designed to protect workers and the environment from microbial aerosols produced during microbiological procedures and accidents. However, there is only limited data available on the aerosols generated from common microbiology procedures. Methods: A series of common microbiological procedures were undertaken with high concentration spore suspensions while air samplers were operated to sample the aerosols generated. Surface contamination from droplets was visualized using sodium fluorescein within the suspension. A total of 36 procedures were studied using different sample volumes (0.1-10 mL) and two spore suspension titers (107 and 109 colony forming units [cfu]/mL). Results: The aerosol concentrations generated varied from 0 to 13,000 cfu/m3. There was evidence to suggest that titer, volume, and poor use of equipment were significant factors in increased aerosol generation from some of the procedures. A risk assessment undertaken using the data showed that any aerosol generated from these processes would be contained within a correctly operating biological safety cabinet. Therefore, with these procedures, the operator and the environment would not require any additional protective measures such as respiratory protective equipment or a negative pressure laboratory to prevent aerosol exposure or release. Conclusions: Aerosol generation from common laboratory processes can be minimized by reducing sample volumes and concentrations if possible. Training laboratory staff in good microbiological techniques would further mitigate aerosols generated from common laboratory processes.
