AvaGen Genetic Testing versus Ocular Screening Assessments Including the Keratoconus Severity Score (KSS) and Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS) in Refractive Surgery Candidates.

Purpose: To determine whether the AvaGen (AG) Genetic Eye Test provided additional information for screening for the presence of keratoconus (KC) and assessing KC risk in refractive surgery candidates, as compared to the Keratoconus Severity Score (KSS) and Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients seeking refractive surgery at an eye clinic in the United States between January 2022 and July 2023. The inclusion criteria encompassed those with a family history of KC, positive KC indices, or both. Corneal evaluations and demographic information were recorded and analyzed. KSS and ERSS criteria were utilized to evaluate postoperative KC and ectasia risk, respectively. Patients were categorized on how the AG genetic test compared to KSS and ERSS criteria. Clinicians assessed topographic indices, criteria scoring, and AG testing to deliver a definitive surgical recommendation. Results: Among the 19 patients evaluated for ectasia risk, AG testing showed lower KC risk than ocular screening in three patients (15.8%), equal risk in three patients (15.8%), and higher risk in 13 patients (68.4%). The mean AG scores were 45.7 ± 7.0, 49.0 ± 3.46, and 61 ± 13.0 for these respective categories. The most frequently identified KC risk genes were ADAMTS18, COL2A1, and COL4A1. The AG test modified the physician's recommendation for refractive surgery in nine cases (47.4%). Conclusion: Despite the promising application of AG testing for assessing KC risk, further research and development are needed to enhance its applicability for screening refractive surgery candidates, in addition to standard ocular screening approaches.

Precision in IOL Calculation for Cataract Patients with Prior History of Combined RK and LASIK Histories.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 12 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae for eyes that have undergone both radial keratotomy (RK) and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery to determine the efficacy of various IOL calculations for this unique patient group. Currently, research on this surgical topic is limited. Methods: In this retrospective study, 11 eyes from 7 individuals with a history of RK and LASIK who underwent cataract surgery at Hoopes Vision were analyzed. Preoperative biometric and corneal topographic measurements were performed. Subjective refraction was obtained postoperatively. Twelve different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations were used: Barrett True K No History, Barrett True K (prior LASIK, Prior RK history), Barrett Universal 2, Camellin-Calossi-Camellin (3C), Double K-Modified Holladay, Haigis-L, Galilei, OCT, PEARL-DGS, Potvin-Hill, Panacea, and Shammas. Results: The rankings of mean arithmetic error (MAE), from least to greatest, were as follows: 3C (0.088), Haigis-L-L (-0.508), Shammas (-0.516), OCT Average (-0.538), Barrett True K (-0.557), OCT RK (-0.563), Galilei (-0.570), IOL Master (-0.571), OCT LASIK (-0.583), Barrett True K No History (-0.597), Pearl-DGS (-0.606), Potvin-Hill SF (-0.770), Potvin-Hill TNP (-0.778), Panacea (-0.876), and Barrett Universal 2 (-1.522). The 3C formula achieved the greatest percentage of eyes within ±0.25 D of target range (91%), while Haigis-L, Shammas, Galilei, Potvin Hill, Barrett True K, IOL Master, PEARL-DGS, and OCT formulae performed similarly, achieving 45% of eyes within ±0.75D of target refraction. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the accuracy of the lesser known 3C formula in IOL calculation, particularly for patients who have undergone both RK and LASIK. Well-known formulae, such as Haigis-L, Shammas, and Galilei, which are used by the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS), are viable options, although 3C formulae should be considered in this patient population. Furthermore, larger studies can confirm the best IOL power formulas for post-RK and LASIK cataract patients.

Merging PRK and Collagen Crosslinking: An Analysis of Literature and a Guide to Prevalent Protocols.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review was to summarize the different surgical approaches combining photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal crosslinking (CXL), present each protocol template in a simple format, and provide an overview of the primary outcomes and adverse events. METHODS: A literature review was conducted as outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Eight different databases were searched. Papers were included if PRK was immediately followed by CXL. RESULTS: Thirty-seven papers met the inclusion criteria of a total yield of 823. The latest research into simultaneous PRK and CXL has been shown to not only stabilize the cornea and prevent keratoconus progression but also improve the visual acuity of the patient. Improvements in uncorrected distance visual acuity and (spectacle) corrected distance visual acuity were found to be significant when considering all protocols. There were also significant reductions in K1, K2, mean K, Kmax, sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent. Random-effects analysis confirmed these trends. Corrected distance visual acuity was found to improve by an average of 0.18 ± 1.49 logMAR (Cohen's D [CD] 0.12; P <0.02). There was also a significant reduction of 2.57 ± 0.45 D (CD 5.74; P <0.001) in Kmax. Cylinder and spherical equivalent were also reduced by 1.36 ± 0.26 D (CD 5.25; P <0.001) and 2.61 ± 0.38 D (CD 6.73; P <0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combining the 2 procedures appears to be of net benefit, showing stabilization and improvement of ectatic disease, while also providing modest gains in visual acuity. Since customized PRK and CXL approaches appear superior, a combination of these would likely be best for patients.

Implication of Corneal Refractive Surgery in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked disorder due to a dystrophin mutation and is the leading cause of muscular dystrophy. DMD presents with characteristic systemic effects, including severe muscular atrophy, cardiomyopathy, and ocular manifestations. Performing corneal refractive surgeries in patients with DMD raises concerns regarding patient positioning, risk of cataracts, and other comorbid conditions. Published reports of photorefractive keratectomy, laser-assisted in situ keratomileuses, and small incision lenticule extraction are lacking in this population. Here, we discuss a patient being evaluated for a corneal refractive surgery. This article also discusses the current understanding of DMD, known ocular manifestations, and factors to consider when evaluating a patient for potential corrective vision laser surgery.

Predictability of Existing IOL Formulas After Cataract Surgery in Patients with a Previous History of Radial Keratotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of 12 different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for post-radial keratotomy (RK) eyes. The investigation utilizes recent advances in topography/tomography devices and artificial intelligence (AI)-based calculators, comparing the results to those reported in current literature to assess the efficacy and predictability of IOL calculations for this patient group. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 37 eyes from 24 individuals with a history of RK who underwent cataract surgery at Hoopes Vision Center were analyzed. Biometry and corneal topography measurements were taken preoperatively. Subjective refraction was obtained 6 months postoperatively. Twelve different IOL power calculations were used, including the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) post-RK online formula, and the Barrett True K, Double K modified-Holladay 1, Haigis-L, Panacea, Camellin-Calossi, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) 2.0, Kane, and Prediction Enhanced by Artificial Intelligence and output Linearization-Debellemanière, Gatinel, and Saad (PEARL-DGS) formulas. Outcome measures included median absolute error (MedAE), mean absolute error (MAE), arithmetic mean error (AME), and percentage of eyes achieving refractive prediction errors (RPE) within ± 0.50 D, ± 0.75 D, and ± 1 D for each formula. A search of the literature was also performed by two independent reviewers based on relevant formulas. RESULTS: Overall, the best performing IOL power calculations were the Camellin-Calossi (MedAE = 0.515 D), the ASCRS average (MedAE = 0.535 D), and the EVO (MedAE = 0.545 D) and Kane (MedAE = 0.555 D) AI-based formulas. The EVO and Kane formulas along with the ASCRS calculation performed similarly, with 48.65% of eyes scoring within ± 0.50 D of the target range, while the Equivalent Keratometry Reading (EKR) 65 Holladay formula achieved the greatest percentage of eyes scoring within ± 0.25 D of the target range (35.14%). Additionally, the EVO 2.0 formula achieved 64.86% of eyes scoring within the ± 0.75 D RPE category, while the Kane formula achieved 75.68% of eyes scoring within the ± 1 D RPE category. There was no significant difference in MAE between the established and newer generation formulas (P > 0.05). The Panacea formula consistently underperformed when compared to the ASCRS average and other high-performing formulas (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the potential of AI-based IOL calculation formulas, such as EVO 2.0 and Kane, for improving the accuracy of IOL power calculation in post-RK eyes undergoing cataract surgery. Established calculations, such as the ASCRS and Barrett True K formula, remain effective options, while under-utilized formulas, like the EKR65 and Camellin-Calossi formulas, show promise, emphasizing the need for further research and larger studies to validate and enhance IOL power calculation for this patient group.

Comparative Analysis of Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations after Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis, Photorefractive Keratectomy, and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction with Correlations to Change in Myopic Q-Value and Spherical Equivalent with and without Astigmatism.

Background: This retrospective chart review compared the higher-order aberrations (HOAs) among photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) alongside changes in spherical equivalent (SEQ) and corneal shape (Q-value). Methods: Analyzing 371 myopic eyes, including 154 LASIK, 173 PRK, and 44 SMILE cases, Pentacam imaging was utilized pre-operatively and at one-year post-operative visits. Results: All procedures resulted in 100% of patients achieving an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/40 or better, with 87% of LASIK and PRK, and 91% of SMILE patients having 20/20 or better. Significant increases in HOAs were observed across all procedures (p < 0.05), correlating positively with SEQ and Q-value changes (LASIK (0.686, p < 0.05), followed by PRK (0.4503, p < 0.05), and SMILE (0.386, p < 0.05)). Vertical coma and spherical aberration (SA) were the primary factors for heightened aberration magnitude among the procedures (p < 0.05), with the largest contribution in SMILE, which is likely attributed to the centration at the corneal apex. Notably, PRK showed insignificant changes in vertical coma (-0.197 µm ± 0.0168 to -0.192 µm ± 0.0198, p = 0.78), with an increase in oblique trefoil (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These findings underscore differences in HOAs among PRK, LASIK, and SMILE, helping to guide clinicians.

Changes in Posterior Cornea and Posterior-To-Anterior Curvature Radii Ratio 1 year After LASIK, PRK, and SMILE Treatment of Myopia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare changes in the posterior curvature and the posterior-anterior radii ratio of the cornea, 1 year postoperatively in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at a single surgical center. 199 eyes were included in the study from 119 patients with manifest refraction spherical equivalents from -7.61 to -2.54 D. 67 eyes underwent LASIK, 89 underwent PRK, and 43 underwent SMILE. Both preoperative and 1-year postoperative front and back sagittal keratometry were measured at 4- to 6-mm zones around the corneal vertex. Corneal asphericity (Q-value) was measured at an 8-mm zone around the corneal vertex. RESULTS: The average change in the posterior-anterior radii ratio after LASIK, PRK, and SMILE did not differ between surgery groups at 4 mm (LASIK: -0.075, PRK: -0.073, SMILE: -0.072, P = 0.720), 5 mm (LASIK: -0.072, PRK: -0.068, SMILE: -0.068, P = 0.531), or 6 mm (LASIK: -0.075, PRK: -0.071, SMILE: -0.072, P = 0.456) zones. Anterior Q-value significantly positively increased after all 3 surgeries (P < 0.001). The posterior Q-value also significantly positively increased after LASIK (P < 0.001) and SMILE (P < 0.001), but not after PRK (P = 0.227). Both anterior and posterior keratometric power decreased significantly after LASIK, PRK, and SMILE for all diameters. CONCLUSIONS: The change in the posterior-anterior radii ratio was not influenced by the type of refractive surgery performed, as indicated by statistically identical preoperative, postoperative, and delta values. In addition, the posterior cornea exhibited paracentral flattening after LASIK, SMILE, and PRK and increased oblateness after LASIK and SMILE.

Correlational Analysis of the Effective Optical Zone with Myopia, Myopic Astigmatism, and Spherical Equivalent in LASIK, PRK, and SMILE.

Purpose: We assess the relationship between preoperative myopic sphere, astigmatism, and spherical equivalent and effective optical zone (EOZ) size, shape, and decentration within individual populations of post-LASIK, PRK, and SMILE patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted with 118 LASIK, 144 PRK, and 41 SMILE eyes from 179 total patients that underwent compound myopic ablation. One-year postoperative Pentacam tangential difference maps were used for EOZ data measurements. Correlational analysis between compound myopic measures [sphere, cylinder, manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE)] and EOZ parameters was performed, and differences between groups of myopic sphere and cylinder within each surgery type were assessed. Results: An increase in absolute myopic sphere (and subsequent MRSE) is associated with a smaller EOZ area in SMILE (r=0.454, p=0.003) and a more circular EOZ shape in LASIK (r=0.396, p<0.001) and PRK (r=0.563, p<0.001). An increase in absolute myopic cylinder is associated with an increased EOZ area in all three surgery types [LASIK (r=-0.459, p<0.001), PRK (r=-0.716, p<0.001), SMILE (r=-0.429, p=0.005)] and a more elliptical EOZ in LASIK (r=-0.491, p<0.001) and PRK (r=-0.538, p<0.001). Conclusion: While astigmatism may be correlated to EOZ size within all three refractive surgery types, myopic sphere alone is insufficient to estimate EOZ size differences for procedures with a large blend zone of ablation like LASIK or PRK. Shape is just as important a factor as size to consider when examining corneal EOZ differences; reported correlative findings likely result from inherent differences in surgical technique and abruptness of planned surgical ablation borders.

Comparing Effective Optical Zones After Myopic Ablation Between LASIK, PRK, and SMILE With Correlation to Higher Order Aberrations.

PURPOSE: To explore size, decentration, and eccentricity of effective optical zones (EOZs) in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and correlate them to higher order aberrations (HOAs). METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 188 eyes that underwent refractive surgery for compound myopia (61 LASIK, 84 PRK, 43 SMILE). EOZ measurements were determined using 1-year postoperative Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) tangential difference maps. HOA data were measured using Pentacam wavefront aberration Zernike polynomials. Correlations between EOZs and HOAs were analyzed. RESULTS: The EOZs of LASIK and PRK are smaller than SMILE at 19.54 ± 1.44, 19.39 ± 1.66, and 22.18 ± 2.61 mm2, respectively (P < .001). No difference existed in absolute decentration from corneal vertex (P = .078) or pupil center (P = .131), but horizontal and vertical components differed significantly (P < .001). Smaller EOZ areas were correlated with greater spherical aberration induction (rLASIK = -0.378, rPRK = -0.555, rSMILE = -0.501) and total HOA induction in all groups. Absolute decentration from corneal vertex positively correlated with total HOA (rLASIK = 0.396, rPRK = 0.463, rSMILE = 0.399) and directional vertical coma induction negatively correlated with vertical decentration from the corneal vertex (rLASIK = -0.776, rPRK = -0.665, rSMILE = -0.576) in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE results in a larger EOZ than LASIK and PRK, and absolute decentration remains comparable regardless of surgical reference center, despite horizontal/vertical differences. Surgical planning to ensure adequate EOZ size and centration may reduce induction of HOAs, including spherical aberrations and vertical coma. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):741-750.].

Exploring Nomograms for Implantable Collamer Lens Size Selection in Myopia: A Literature-based Compilation.

Purpose: To provide a comprehensive guide of all implantable collamer lens (ICL) sizing nomograms and the respective preoperative diagnostic devices that are required. This guide would help clinicians in choosing the appropriate ICL size for myopic patients to optimize postoperative vault height. Methods: A literature search of peer-reviewed journals describing methods and postoperative outcomes of ICL sizing was conducted. Research articles containing ICL nomograms or formulas were identified from this search. Preoperative variables necessary for these nomograms and the required diagnostic devices to measure these parameters such as topography, biometry, or ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) were noted. An additional search was conducted to identify artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning (ML)-derived nomograms. Results: Eighteen ICL sizing nomograms were identified through literature search. Five of these nomograms are available for use and require topography or biometry devices. Of these, four include the manufacturer's, optimized white-to-white (WTW), Kang, Kim, and Rocamora Nomograms. Eight of the 18 nomograms available for use require UBM. Eight of these include the Kojima, Nakamura, KS, ZZ, Dougherty, Parkhurst, Russo, and Reinstein Nomograms. Four of the 18 nomograms are ML-derived including Shen, Rocamora, Russo, and Kang Nomograms. Conclusion: ICL nomograms are a vital tool in helping clinicians select the right ICL size for myopic patients to optimize postoperative vault reducing risk of postoperative complications. Based on available diagnostic devices such as topography, biometry, or UBM clinicians can integrate specific nomograms into practice.

Comparing the Accuracy of the Kane, Barrett Universal II, Hill-Radial Basis Function, Emmetropia Verifying Optical, and Ladas Super Formula Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas.

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of five new-generation intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas: Barrett Universal II (BUII), Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) Formula, Hill-Radial Basis Function (Hill-RBF), Kane Formula, and Ladas Super Formula (LSF). Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective single-surgeon study from a refractive clinic and clinical research center in Draper, UT, USA. The primary outcome measures were mean absolute error (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE). Secondary outcome measures were the standard deviation (SD) of each formula's refractive prediction errors (RPE) and the percentage of eyes within ±0.50D. Refractive predictions were compared to the postoperative spherical equivalent to determine the RPE for each formula. RPEs were optimized, and MAE, MedAE, SD of the AME, and percent of eyes achieving RPEs within the specified ranges of ±0.125 D, ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D, ±1.0 D were calculated. Subgroup analysis between different axial lengths was attempted but yielded insufficient statistical power to draw meaningful conclusions. Results: A total of 103 eyes of 103 patients were included in our study after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to 606 eyes from 2019 to 2021. Formulas ranked in ascending order by MAE were Kane, EVO, BUII, Hill-RBF, and LSF. The ascending rankings of MedAE were Kane, BUII, Hill-RBF, EVO, Ladas. Kane had a significantly lower MAE than Hill-RBF (p<0.001). EVO had the lowest SD of AMEs and the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D. According to heteroscedastic testing, EVO also had a statistically significant lower SD than Hill-RBF. Conclusion: Kane was the most accurate formula in terms of MAE and MedAE. EVO and BUII achieved marginally higher MAEs than Kane, suggesting these three formulas are comparable in performance. With the exception EVO and Hill-RBF, the heteroscedastic test yielded no significant differences in SD between the formulas. Although there were multiple statistically significant differences between the formulas in terms of MAE, MedAE, and SD, these differences may not be appreciable clinically. Lastly, there were no statistically significant differences in the percent of eyes with RPEs within ±0.50 D, suggesting similar clinical performance between formulas.

Influence of Preoperative Parameters on the Ratio of Keratometric Change per Diopter of Attempted Spherical Equivalent (∆K/∆SEQ) for Myopic Correction Within LASIK, PRK, and SMILE.

Purpose: To compare 3 of the most common corneal refractive procedures; PRK, LASIK, and SMILE assessing ΔK/ΔSEQ ratio and its correlation with preoperative demographics including age, keratometry, pachymetry, cylinder value, and attempted myopic correction. The goal was to analyze the relative strength of each preoperative parameter in accounting for changes in ∆K/∆SEQ. Patients and Methods: A total of 370 eyes from 102 male and 97 female patients (173 eyes PRK, 153 LASIK, and 44 SMILE) with ages ranging from 20 to 51 underwent refractive surgery for myopia between -0.25 and -7.71 D manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE). All surgeries were performed at a single surgery center in Draper, Utah. The Pentacam was used for all optical measurements and data were gathered pre-operatively and then again 1-year post-operatively. Only patients who achieved emmetropia at a visual acuity of 20/25 or better were included. Results: The mean ΔK/ΔSEQ ratio for LASIK (0.839 ± 0.020) was significantly greater than that of PRK (0.775 ± 0.022) and SMILE (0.709 ± 0.046). Age was found to negatively correlate with ΔK/ΔSEQ for both LASIK (r = -0.177) and SMILE (r = -0.451) procedures. Pre-op keratometry was found to negatively correlate with ΔK/ΔSEQ for LASIK (r = -0.202) but not for PRK or SMILE. Pre-op pachymetry was not correlated with ΔK/ΔSEQ for any of the procedures. Attempted myopic spherical equivalent (SEQ) correction was positively correlated with ΔK/ΔSEQ for LASIK (r = 0.236), PRK (r = 0.459), and SMILE (r = 0.304). Lastly, pre-op cylinder value was found to be correlated to ΔK/ΔSEQ in SMILE (r = -0.367), but not in LASIK or PRK. Conclusion: The ΔK/ΔSEQ ratio not only differs depending on the procedure being done but also by pre-operative factors such as age, keratometry, attempted correction, and cylinder value. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the attempted correction had the greatest effect on ∆K/∆SEQ out of all parameters in LASIK and PRK. For SMILE, age had the greatest predictive value of the change in ∆K/∆SEQ. While the exact effect of these parameters will vary by surgeon, all of these should be factored into a refractive surgeon's nomograms in order to achieve optimal visual outcomes for their patients.

Incidence and Management of Epithelial-Related Complications After SMILE.

Purpose: To investigate the incidence and management of only epithelial-related complications following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Patients and Methods: A retrospective, single-site study analyzed patients who underwent SMILE at Hoopes Vision Clinic in Draper, Utah, from June 2017 to February 2023. Demographic data and preoperative parameters were reviewed. Postoperatively, patients were assessed for visual acuity and complications at different time points. Statistical analyses were conducted between the control and complication groups. Results: Four hundred and thirty-two eyes of 220 patients received SMILE. Postoperative epithelial-related complications were indicated in 68 (15.7%) eyes, including anterior basement membrane (ABM) changes (five [1.2%]) eyes), epithelial ingrowth (nine [2.1%] eyes), erosion (two [0.5%] eyes), rough epithelium (18 [4.2%] eyes), epithelial defect (12 [2.8%] eyes), diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) secondary to epitheliopathy (two [0.5%] eyes), microstriae secondary to epitheliopathy (four [0.9%] eyes), interface debris (21 [4.9%] eyes), and incisional fibrosis (one [0.2%] eye). There was a statistically significant difference in age, with older patients more likely to develop epitheliopathy postoperatively (P = 0.001). Additionally, patients with epithelial-related complications were more likely to receive photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancement after SMILE than the control (P = 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) better than 20/20 and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) between the complications group and the control at the last postoperative visit (P = 0.974 and 0.310, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in the safety and efficacy indices between the complications and control group (P = 0.281 and 0.617, respectively). Conclusion: In our study, epithelial-related complications were more prevalent in older patients and predisposed patients to require PRK enhancements after recovery from SMILE. Despite the incidence of epithelial-related complications, visual prognoses were favorable and achieved through various management strategies.

Assessment of Pupil Size and Angle Kappa in Refractive Surgery: A Population-Based Epidemiological Study in Predominantly American Caucasians.

Purpose This retrospective study aims to establish normative values for pupil size, angle kappa, higher-order aberration, and astigmatism type in a largely Caucasian population in Utah, United States, utilizing the NIDEK OPD-Scan III system (Gamagori, Japan). Methods This study included 716 patients (1432 eyes) grouped based on spherical equivalence and age. Measurements were conducted under mesopic and photopic conditions. Statistical analysis involved Pearson's correlation and linear regression using the generalized estimating equation. NIDEK OPD-Scan III measured mesopic and photopic pupil size and angle kappa. The subjects were then grouped based on their spherical equivalence in diopters (D) and age in decades. The spherical equivalence groups were defined: >-6 D, -5.99 to -3 D, -2.99 to -0.25 D, -0.24 to 0.24 D, and >0.25 D (range 0.25-5.75 D). The higher-order aberration groups were based on the reason for the visit: laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, and small incision lenticule extraction as one group; cataract evaluation; and keratoconus. Astigmatism measurements were grouped into with-the-rule (WRT), against-the-rule (ATR), and oblique astigmatism, with further subgrouping into a young cohort (20-40 years) and an old cohort (>65 years).  Results Among 716 participants, 49.2% were men; the mean age was 42.1±15.5 (range 7-88 years). The average spherical equivalence for myopia eyes was -3.28±2.34 D, and 1.51±1.46 D for hyperopia eyes. The mean mesopic pupil size was 5.68 ± 1.09 mm; the photopic pupil size was 4.65±1.09 mm. Pearson's correlation coefficient for mesopic pupil size versus age was -0.551, and -0.42 for photopic pupil (p < 0.001); sphere vs mesopic pupil size was -0.200, and -0.173 for photopic pupil (p < 0.001). The regression analysis for mesopic pupil size versus age revealed a 0.39 mm decrease in average pupil size per decade increase in age, and 0.25 mm decrease per decade for photopic pupil. The regression analysis for mesopic pupil size versus sphere revealed a 0.22 mm decrease in average pupil size per 3D increase in sphere, and a 0.16 mm decrease 3 D increase in sphere for the photopic pupil. The mean mesopic angle kappa was 0.33 ± 0.15 mm; photopic angle kappa was 0.31±0.15 mm. Pearson's correlation coefficient for mesopic angle kappa vs spherical equivalence was 0.32, and 0.296 for photopic angle kappa (p <0.001 for both). Regression analysis for mesopic angle kappa vs spherical equivalence demonstrated a 0.051 mm increase in angle kappa per 3 D increase in spherical equivalence, and a 0.048 mm increase for photopic angle kappa (p < 0.001 for both). Among the higher-order aberration groups, the keratoconus group exhibited the highest levels. In terms of astigmatism type, WRT astigmatism was the most common in the young cohort, while ATR astigmatism was most prevalent in the older cohort. Conclusions The results of this study reveal significant associations between pupil size and increasing age, as well as between pupil size and increasingly positive refractive errors. These findings hold particular clinical relevance to older patients and individuals with hyperopia, as they undergo photoablative corneal refractive surgery or multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Understanding the established normative values for pupil size, angle kappa, higher-order aberration, and astigmatism type can aid clinicians in making more informed decisions and improving patient outcomes.

A Literature Review of the Incidence, Management, and Prognosis of Corneal Epithelial-Related Complications After Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK), Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

Our purpose is to provide a comprehensive investigation into the incidence, treatment modalities, and visual prognosis of epithelial-related complications in corneal refractive surgeries, including laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). A systematic search of multiple databases was conducted by two independent examiners using various search terms related to epithelial-related complications and corneal refractive surgeries. A total of 91 research articles were included, encompassing a sample size of 66,751 eyes across the three types of surgeries. The average incidence of epithelial-related complications varied across the different types of corneal refractive surgeries. LASIK had an average incidence of 4.9% for epithelial defects, while PRK and SMILE had lower rates of 3.3% and 3.9%, respectively. Our findings indicate that SMILE has a lower incidence of epithelial defects compared to LASIK, potentially due to the less invasive nature of lenticule incision in SMILE. Visual prognosis after epithelial complications (EC) is generally favorable, with various supportive care and surgical interventions leading to significant improvements in postoperative visual acuity and full recovery. Understanding the incidence rates and management approaches for epithelial-related complications can guide clinicians in enhancing patient safety, refining surgical techniques, and optimizing postoperative outcomes in corneal refractive surgeries.

Management of Corneal Haze After Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is a safe and popular corneal surgery performed worldwide. Nevertheless, there is potential risk of corneal haze development after surgery. Proper management of post PRK haze is important for good visual outcome. We performed a comprehensive review of the literature on the various risk factors and treatments for PRK haze, searching the PubMed, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, and Embase databases using relevant search terms. All articles in English from August 1989 through April 2023 were reviewed for this study, among which 102 articles were chosen to be included in the study. Depending on the characteristics of and examination findings on post PRK haze, different management options may be preferred. In the proposed framework, management of PRK haze should include a full workup that includes patient's subjective complaints and loss of vision as well as visual acuity, biomicroscopy, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, epithelial mapping, and Scheimpflug densitometry. Topical steroid treatment for haze should be stratified based on early- or late-onset haze. Mechanical debridement or superficial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) may be used to treat superficial corneal haze. Deep PTK and/or PRK can be used to treat deep corneal haze. Mitomycin-C and topical steroids are prophylactic post-surgery agents to prevent recurrence of haze.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications in the Measurement of Interpupillary Distance.

Purpose To determine the accuracy of three smartphone applications in the measurement of interpupillary distance (IPD). Methods This study compared measurements from three smartphone applications to measurements obtained by a single trained examiner using a digital pupilometer in 44 subjects. The mean absolute error (MAE) of IPD prediction by each application was compared. Additionally, the frequency at which each application measured IPD within ± 0.05 mm, ± 0.10 mm, ± 0.25 mm, ± 0.50 mm, ± 0.75 mm, and ± 1.00 mm of the digital pupilometer measurement was determined. Results The Eye Measure (Dotty Digital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) and Warby Parker (Warby Parker, New York, New York) applications had significantly lower MAE of IPD measurements (0.511364 mm) compared to the PDCheck AR (EyeQue Corp., Newark, California) application (1.375 mm). The Warby Parker application most frequently obtained accurate IPD measurements within the following ranges: ± 0.05 mm, ± 0.10 mm, ± 0.25 mm, ± 0.50 mm, ± 0.75 mm, and ± 1.00 mm. Conclusion Of the three smartphone applications compared in this study, the Warby Parker application performed to the highest degree of accuracy and may serve as an adequate alternative when conventional IPD measurement methods are either unavailable or unable to be performed accurately.

Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: A Comparative Analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Human Expertise in Answering StatPearls Questions.

Importance Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) has shown promising performance in various fields, including medicine, business, and law, but its accuracy in specialty-specific medical questions, particularly in ophthalmology, is still uncertain. Purpose This study evaluates the performance of two ChatGPT models (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) and human professionals in answering ophthalmology questions from the StatPearls question bank, assessing their outcomes, and providing insights into the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in ophthalmology. Methods ChatGPT's performance was evaluated using 467 ophthalmology questions from the StatPearls question bank. These questions were stratified into 11 subcategories, four difficulty levels, and three generalized anatomical categories. The answer accuracy of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and human participants was assessed. Statistical analysis was conducted via the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the statistical significance of GPT-3 versus GPT-4 versus human performance, and repeated unpaired two-sample t-tests to compare the means of two groups. Results GPT-4 outperformed both GPT-3.5 and human professionals on ophthalmology StatPearls questions, except in the "Lens and Cataract" category. The performance differences were statistically significant overall, with GPT-4 achieving higher accuracy (73.2%) compared to GPT-3.5 (55.5%, p-value < 0.001) and humans (58.3%, p-value < 0.001). There were variations in performance across difficulty levels (rated one to four), but GPT-4 consistently performed better than both GPT-3.5 and humans on level-two, -three, and -four questions. On questions of level-four difficulty, human performance significantly exceeded that of GPT-3.5 (p = 0.008). Conclusion The study's findings demonstrate GPT-4's significant performance improvements over GPT-3.5 and human professionals on StatPearls ophthalmology questions. Our results highlight the potential of advanced conversational AI systems to be utilized as important tools in the education and practice of medicine.