High-resolution MR imaging for dental impressions: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging is an emerging technology in dental medicine. While low-resolution MRI has especially provided means to examine the temporomandibular joint due to its anatomic inaccessibility, it was the goal of this study to assess whether high-resolution MRI is capable of delivering a dataset sufficiently precise enough to serve as digital impression of human teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An informed and consenting patient in need of dental restoration with fixed partial dentures was chosen as subject. Two prepared teeth were measured using MRI and the dataset subjected to mathematical processing before Fourier transformation. After reconstruction, a 3D file was generated which was fed into an existing industry standard CAD/CAM process. RESULTS: A framework for a fixed dental prosthesis was digitally modeled and manufactured by laser-sintering. The fit in situ was found to be acceptable by current clinical standards, which allowed permanent placement of the fixed prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Using a clinical whole-body MR scanner with the addition of custom add-on hardware, contrast enhancement, and data post-processing, resolution and signal-to-noise ratio were sufficiently achieved to allow fabrication of a dental restoration in an acquisition time comparable to the setting time of common dental impression materials. Furthermore, the measurement was well tolerated. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The herein described method can be regarded as proof of principle that MRI is a promising option for digital impressions when fixed partial dentures are required.

High isotropic resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the mandibular canal at 1.5 T: a comparison of gradient and spin echo sequences.

OBJECTIVES: The precision of localizing the mandibular canal prior to surgical intervention depends on the achievable resolution, whereas identification of the nerve depends on the image contrast. In our study, we developed new protocols based on gradient and spin echo sequences. The results from both sequences were quantitatively compared for their agreement to identify the most suitable approach. METHODS: By limiting the field of view to one side of the mandible, three-dimensional acquisitions with T1 weighted gradient and spin echo sequences were performed with 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm3 resolution within 6.5 min covering the mandibular canal from the mandibular to the mental foramen. Aliasing artefacts were suppressed by different techniques. A manual segmentation of the mandibular canal from seven healthy volunteers was performed on this section by three different observers. The surface distance of the segmented volumes was computed between both sequences as well as between the different observers as a measure of equality. RESULTS: The quantitative comparison of the segmentation resulted in an average surface distance of 0.26 ± 0.05 mm between both sequences and an interobserver difference of 0.26 ± 0.08 mm for gradient and 0.29 ± 0.07 mm for spin echo data. By repeated evaluation, a difference of 0.15 ± 0.02 mm for gradient and 0.18 ± 0.03 mm for spin echo data was observed, indicating a slightly higher variability for spin echo images. CONCLUSIONS: Both sequences can be used to achieve high-resolution images with good contrast and can be used for precise localization of the mandibular canal. Despite a slightly increased difference for the spin echo data, the advantage of an easy and robust setup remains.