Birth at 22 gestational weeks: case report of cognitive resilience.

OBJECTIVE: Children delivered at the edge of viability are at greatest risk of medical and neuropsychological disability, their adverse outcomes overshadowing extremely preterm survivors with more optimal outcomes. We aimed to describe an exceptionally early-born extremely preterm (EEEP) preschooler whose neurobiological, familial, and socioeconomic factors likely influenced her unexpected cognitive resilience. METHOD: Baby G was a 3-years 10-months-old, English-speaking, Caucasian, singleton girl born weighing 435 g at 225/7 weeks' gestation to well-educated married parents. Neonatal complications of extremely premature birth included sepsis, severe respiratory distress syndrome, patent ductus arteriosus requiring ligation, necrotizing enterocolitis not requiring surgical intervention, and retinopathy of prematurity. Intellectual and neuropsychological testing was administered. RESULTS: Baby G performed age-appropriately in nearly all domains and did not exhibit intellectual deficits. Her general conceptual ability was above average for both her chronological and adjusted ages. She had below average performance on tests of motor function, working memory, and delayed recall of spatial locations. Standardized parental behavioral questionnaires indicated no concern in emotional or attentional functioning except in relation to mental shifting capacity and signs of anxiety. CONCLUSION: Report of persistent adverse neurodevelopmental/neuropsychological disabilities following EEEP birth is a counterpoint to the more optimal outcomes in some vulnerable EEEP survivors. This case emphasizes that decisions about aggressive resuscitation and prognostication for infants born EEEP may be enhanced by consideration of individual variability, and of pertinent medical, socioeconomic, and sociodemographic variables that may be more predictive of neuropsychological outcomes than birth weight and gestational age.

Test of visuospatial construction: Validity evidence in extremely low birth weight and late preterm children at early school age.

The Test of Visuospatial Construction (TVSC), a measure of visuoconstruction that does not rely on upper extremity motor response or written production, was administered to extremely low birth weight (ELBW), late preterm (LPT), and term participants at preschool (n = 355) and kindergarten (n = 265) ages. TVSC showed statistically significant weak-to-moderate positive correlations (age 3: r = .118-.303; age 6: r = .138-.348) with Developmental VMI, Differential Ability Scales-II Copying, Matrices, and Pattern Construction subtests, Baron-Hopkins Board Test, and the Purdue Pegboard. One-way ANOVA indicated ELBW performed worse than Term (p = .044) on visuospatial construction at age 3 with a small-to-medium effect size (d = -0.43). No other statistically significant differences were found at age 3 on the TVSC (ELBW/LPT: p = .608, d = -0.17; LPT/Term: p = .116, d = -0.31). At age 6, ELBW participants performed worse than LPT participants (p = .027) and Term participants (p = .012); LPT participants did not differ from Term participants. Small effect sizes at age 3 (ELBW < LPT, d = -0.17; ELBW < Term, d = -0.43) were notably larger at age 6 (ELBW < LPT, d = -0.42; ELBW < Term, d = -0.53). Important practical differences showing LPT participants performed below Term participants (d = -0.31) at age 3 were no longer evident at age 6 (d = -0.097). These findings provide preliminary evidence of TVSC validity supporting its use to detect neuropsychological impairment and to recommend appropriate interventions in young preterm children.