ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin would be more effective than aspirin alone for secondary cardiovascular prevention. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The study was stopped for superiority of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group after a mean follow-up of 23 months. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group than in the aspirin-alone group (379 patients [4.1%] vs. 496 patients [5.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86; P<0.001; z=-4.126), but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group (288 patients [3.1%] vs. 170 patients [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.40 to 2.05; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in intracranial or fatal bleeding between these two groups. There were 313 deaths (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group as compared with 378 (4.1%) in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96; P=0.01; threshold P value for significance, 0.0025). The primary outcome did not occur in significantly fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group than in the aspirin-alone group, but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group...
Subject(s)
Aspirin , Cardiovascular Diseases , RivaroxabanABSTRACT
Steady-state pharmacokinetics of valproic acid (VPA) with or without other antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment were studied in 37 children. Children (N = 16) receiving multiple AED therapy had a higher clearance (23.5 vs 13.0 ml/hr/kg, P less than 0.001), larger volume of distribution (0.30 vs 0.22 L/kg, P less than 0.01), and shorter half-life (9.4 vs 12.3 hours, P less than 0.01) than did those (n = 21) receiving VPA only. Inverse correlations of age with clearance (R = -0.559, P less than 0.01) and apparent volume of distribution of VPA (r = -0.490, P less than 0.05) were observed in children receiving monotherapy. In determining the dose and dosing interval of VPA, consider a possible alteration in the pharmacokinetics relating to age and other concurrent AED therapy.