Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Nutrients ; 16(8)2024 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674912

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are prevalent among older people, often leading to reduced mobility, muscle loss, and bone density decline. Malnutrition exacerbates the prognosis post surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a 12-week regimen of a high-calorie, high-protein oral supplement with ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate (HC-HP-HMB-ONS) on nutritional status, daily activities, and compliance in malnourished or at-risk older patients with hip fractures receiving standard care. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 270 subjects ≥75 years of age, residing at home or in nursing homes, malnourished or at risk of malnutrition, and post hip fracture surgery, received HC-HP-HMB-ONS for 12 weeks. Various scales and questionnaires assessed outcomes. RESULTS: During the 12 weeks of follow-up, 82.8% consumed ≥75% of HC-HP-HMB-ONS. By week 12, 62.4% gained or maintained weight (+0.3 kg), 29.2% achieved normal nutritional status (mean MNA score +2.8), and 46.8% improved nutritional status. Biochemical parameters improved significantly. Subjects reported good tolerability (mean score 8.5/10), with 87.1% of healthcare providers concurring. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of HC-HP-HMB-ONS markedly enhanced nutritional status and biochemical parameters in older hip-fracture patients, with high compliance and tolerability. Both patients and healthcare professionals expressed satisfaction with HC-HP-HMB-ONS.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Hip Fractures , Malnutrition , Nutritional Status , Valerates , Humans , Aged , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Malnutrition/etiology , Valerates/administration & dosage , Diet, High-Protein , Administration, Oral , Energy Intake , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
2.
Rev. esp. geriatr. gerontol. (Ed. impr.) ; 58(1): 27-30, ene.-feb. 2023. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-216617

ABSTRACT

Introducción: En junio de 2020, tras la primera ola de la pandemia de COVID-19, se crearon unidades de geriatría de enlace hospitalaria y unidades de atención a residencia de atención primaria en la Comunidad de Madrid, para mejorar la atención sanitaria a los residentes de forma coordinada. Objetivo: Analizar la situación y la actividad realizada por las unidades de geriatría de enlace hospitalaria. Material y métodos: Estudio transversal realizado mediante una encuesta electrónica que se envió a los geriatras de enlace en marzo de 2022, incluyendo los siguientes apartados: recursos disponibles, áreas de atención sanitaria, motivos de consulta, intervenciones asistenciales, actividad investigadora y/o docente, perfiles de residentes atendidos y coordinación con otros profesionales hospitalarios en dicho momento. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de los datos. Resultados: Respondieron 100% de las unidades de geriatría de enlace existentes, describiendo importantes diferencias en cuanto a los recursos humanos, el horario de atención y el volumen de pacientes atendidos. Respecto a la actividad asistencial de estas unidades, destacaron la consulta telemática, la valoración presencial durante la hospitalización y en el servicio de urgencias. Los principales motivos de valoración fueron la toma de decisiones, patología aguda y síndromes geriátricos y, entre las intervenciones, la gestión de fármacos de uso hospitalario y de material ortoprotésico. (AU)


Introduction: In June 2020, after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, Hospital-Based Liaison Geriatrics units and Primary Care nursing care units were created in the Community of Madrid to improve health care for residents in a coordinated manner. Objective: To analyze the situation and the activity of the Hospital-Based Liaison Geriatrics units. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an electronic survey prepared and sent to the liaison geriatricians in March 2022, including the following sections: available resources, areas of health care, reasons for consultation, care interventions, research and teaching activity, profiles of residents attended and coordination with other health professionals at that time. A descriptive analysis of the data was performed. Results: 100% of the existing Liaison Geriatrics units responded, describing essential differences in human resources, hours of care and volume of patients attended. Regarding the care activity of these units, they highlighted the telematic consultation, and the face-to-face assessment during hospitalization and in the emergency department. The main reasons for assessment were decision-making, acute pathology and geriatric syndromes; and the in-hospital drug management or orthoprosthetic aids among the interventions. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Nursing Homes , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Homes for the Aged , Telemedicine
3.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol ; 58(1): 27-30, 2023.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36446658

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In June 2020, after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, Hospital-Based Liaison Geriatrics units and Primary Care nursing care units were created in the Community of Madrid to improve health care for residents in a coordinated manner. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the situation and the activity of the Hospital-Based Liaison Geriatrics units. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an electronic survey prepared and sent to the liaison geriatricians in March 2022, including the following sections: available resources, areas of health care, reasons for consultation, care interventions, research and teaching activity, profiles of residents attended and coordination with other health professionals at that time. A descriptive analysis of the data was performed. RESULTS: 100% of the existing Liaison Geriatrics units responded, describing essential differences in human resources, hours of care and volume of patients attended. Regarding the care activity of these units, they highlighted the telematic consultation, and the face-to-face assessment during hospitalization and in the emergency department. The main reasons for assessment were decision-making, acute pathology and geriatric syndromes; and the in-hospital drug management or orthoprosthetic aids among the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the heterogeneity in the resources of the different Liaison Geriatric units, there is a similarity in their care activity and the use of telemedicine. It is common to request an assessment for decision-making, acute pathology or geriatric syndromes and interventions for managing in-hospital drugs and tests, orthoprosthetic aids and coordination with other specialists. Liaison Geriatrics units must continue leading quality health care coordinated with nursing homes, as well as continuity of care for residents.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Geriatrics , Humans , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Syndrome , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Nursing Homes
4.
Rev. esp. geriatr. gerontol. (Ed. impr.) ; 55(2): 84-97, mar.-abr. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-199852

ABSTRACT

Cada vez es mayor el número de pacientes de edad avanzada que está siendo tratado por especialidades diferentes a la geriatría, las cuales, por las características de sus tratamientos, necesitan conocer el pronóstico que tiene su indicación en los pacientes ancianos frágiles y optimizar la situación de estos pacientes para mejorar dicho pronóstico. Las más frecuentes, actualmente, son oncología y hematología, cardiología, cirugía general y otros servicios quirúrgicos. Se entiende por geriatría transversal la ampliación del área de conocimiento y atención de la geriatría en sentido horizontal, fuera de sus unidades habituales, aplicando los principios de la medicina geriátrica con un enfoque multidisciplinar al terreno de otros servicios que atienden a pacientes muy mayores y frágiles con enfermedades graves, con el objetivo de ofrecer una atención centrada en la persona y mejorar su manejo integral. La valoración geriátrica y la detección de la fragilidad en estos casos aportan información pronóstica y ayudan en la toma de decisiones y en la selección de un tratamiento individualizado. En algunos casos es posible mejorar la evolución de los pacientes y la eficiencia del sistema sanitario. En este artículo se revisan estos conceptos, se describen algunos modelos existentes, se mencionan los instrumentos más empleados para esta función y se resumen algunas actividades de esta nueva área de la asistencia geriátrica. Es previsible que cada vez en más hospitales se solicite a los servicios de geriatría la implementación de este tipo de valoraciones e intervenciones. Existe información básica para su puesta en marcha, pero no la suficiente como para considerar que están respondidas todas las preguntas que se plantean. Será, pues, en los próximos años un nuevo reto para esta especialidad


Increasing numbers of older persons are being treated by specialties other than Geriatric Medicine. Specialists turn to Geriatric Teams when they need to accurately stratify their patients' risk and prognosis, predict the potential impact of their, often, invasive interventions, optimise their clinical status, and contribute to discharge planning. Oncology and Haematology, Cardiology, General Surgery, and other surgical departments are examples where such collaborative working is already established, to a varying extent. The use of the term "Cross-speciality Geriatrics" is suggested when geriatric care is provided in clinical areas traditionally outside the reach of Geriatric Teams. The core principles of Geriatric Medicine (comprehensive geriatric assessment, patient-centred multidisciplinary targeted interventions, and input at point-of-care) are adapted to the specifics of each specialty and applied to frail older patients in order to deliver a holistic assessment/treatment, better patient/carer experience, and improved clinical outcomes. Using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment methodology and Frailty scoring in such patients provides invaluable prognostic information, helps in decision making, and enables personalised treatment strategies. There is evidence that such an approach improves the efficiency of health care systems and patient outcomes. This article includes a review of these concepts, describes existing models of care, presents the most commonly used clinical tools, and offers examples of excellence in this new era of geriatric care. In an ever ageing population it is likely that teams will be asked to provide Cross-specialty Geriatrics across different Health Care systems. The fundamentals for its implementation are in place, but further evidence is required to guide future development and consolidation, making it one of the most important challenges for Geriatrics in the coming years


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Health Services for the Aged/trends , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Frail Elderly , 17140 , Aging
5.
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol ; 55(2): 84-97, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31870507

ABSTRACT

Increasing numbers of older persons are being treated by specialties other than Geriatric Medicine. Specialists turn to Geriatric Teams when they need to accurately stratify their patients' risk and prognosis, predict the potential impact of their, often, invasive interventions, optimise their clinical status, and contribute to discharge planning. Oncology and Haematology, Cardiology, General Surgery, and other surgical departments are examples where such collaborative working is already established, to a varying extent. The use of the term "Cross-speciality Geriatrics" is suggested when geriatric care is provided in clinical areas traditionally outside the reach of Geriatric Teams. The core principles of Geriatric Medicine (comprehensive geriatric assessment, patient-centred multidisciplinary targeted interventions, and input at point-of-care) are adapted to the specifics of each specialty and applied to frail older patients in order to deliver a holistic assessment/treatment, better patient/carer experience, and improved clinical outcomes. Using Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment methodology and Frailty scoring in such patients provides invaluable prognostic information, helps in decision making, and enables personalised treatment strategies. There is evidence that such an approach improves the efficiency of health care systems and patient outcomes. This article includes a review of these concepts, describes existing models of care, presents the most commonly used clinical tools, and offers examples of excellence in this new era of geriatric care. In an ever ageing population it is likely that teams will be asked to provide Cross-specialty Geriatrics across different Health Care systems. The fundamentals for its implementation are in place, but further evidence is required to guide future development and consolidation, making it one of the most important challenges for Geriatrics in the coming years.


Subject(s)
Frailty/diagnosis , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Geriatrics/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiology , Clinical Decision-Making , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Frailty/complications , Frailty/epidemiology , General Surgery , Hematology , Humans , Medical Oncology , Patient-Centered Care , Prevalence , Treatment Outcome , Urology
10.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 137(8): 355-360, sept. 2011.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-91891

ABSTRACT

La tasa de mortalidad después de sufrir una fractura de cadera es muy elevada, duplica la de las personas de la misma edad sin fractura y el exceso de mortalidad se mantiene durante años. Existen una serie de factores conocidos, dependientes del paciente, que se asocian a una mayor mortalidad y que permiten identificar a los portadores de mayor riesgo de muerte, pero los mecanismos íntimos de la relación entre fractura y mortalidad no son bien conocidos. Las causas de defunción no difieren de las habituales en la edad avanzada. Los pacientes del sexo masculino están especialmente expuestos. Durante el postoperatorio temprano fallecen más los pacientes previamente más frágiles y con mayor comorbilidad, pero durante los meses y años posteriores la mortalidad también afecta a personas previamente saludables. Algunas estrategias que pueden reducir la mortalidad debida a la fractura de cadera son la reducción de su incidencia, el manejo multidisciplinar de todo el proceso asistencial y la instauración de tratamiento de fondo para la osteoporosis (AU)


The mortality rate after a hip fracture is very high. It doubles those of people of the same age without fracture and the excess of mortality remains for years. There are several patient-dependent factors known to be related to the higher mortality and they allow identifying the patients with a higher risk of death, but the intrinsic mechanisms of the association between fracture and mortality are not well known. The causes of death are the same as the usual in the elderly. Males have a higher risk. The more fragile patients and those with more comorbidities die more frequently during the early postoperative period, but in the following months and years the mortality affects to healthier people too. Some strategies that can reduce the mortality include the reduction of hip fracture incidence, the multidisciplinary management of the process and osteoporosis treatment (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Hip Fractures/mortality , Causality , Risk Factors , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/prevention & control
11.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 137(8): 355-60, 2011 Sep 24.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20889172

ABSTRACT

The mortality rate after a hip fracture is very high. It doubles those of people of the same age without fracture and the excess of mortality remains for years. There are several patient-dependent factors known to be related to the higher mortality and they allow identifying the patients with a higher risk of death, but the intrinsic mechanisms of the association between fracture and mortality are not well known. The causes of death are the same as the usual in the elderly. Males have a higher risk. The more fragile patients and those with more comorbidities die more frequently during the early postoperative period, but in the following months and years the mortality affects to healthier people too. Some strategies that can reduce the mortality include the reduction of hip fracture incidence, the multidisciplinary management of the process and osteoporosis treatment.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/mortality , Age Factors , Cause of Death , Female , Hip Fractures/complications , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...