ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonic manometry has been used to assess colonic neuromuscular integrity in pediatric patients with severe constipation unresponsive to standard medical therapy and to tailor their treatment plans. There are presently no available standard protocols for conducting colonic manometry studies. The aim of the present study was to determine whether colonic manometry studies can be conducted on the same day the colonic motility catheters are placed and to compare the effects of inhaled sevoflurane versus intravenous propofol, used during catheter placement, on colonic motility. METHODS: Twenty patients, randomized to receive sevoflurane or propofol during catheter placement, underwent colonic manometry on the day of catheter placement as well as the day after. The total motility index (MI), change in MI in response to a meal and bisacodyl, and presence of high-amplitude propagating contractions were compared between the 2 studies for each patient. RESULTS: Ten patients were allocated to sevoflurane and 10 patients to propofol. A total of 8 (80%) patients in the sevoflurane group and 9 (90%) patients in the propofol group had no differences in their studies between days 1 and 2 when the tracings were interpreted manually for gross evidence of high-amplitude propagating contractions and gastrocolonic reflex. Similarly, there was no change in the total MI between studies done on days 1 and 2 in either sevoflurane (978 ± 232 vs 978 ± 184; P = 0.99) or propofol (968 ± 200 vs 1078 ± 227; P = 0.29) group. When comparing change in MI in response to a meal or bisacodyl between the 2 days, there was no statistical difference noted in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic manometry studies can be conducted as early as 4 hours following catheter placement with either propofol or sevoflurane used for anesthesia.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics/pharmacology , Catheterization , Colon/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Motility/drug effects , Manometry/methods , Methyl Ethers/pharmacology , Propofol/pharmacology , Adolescent , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Catheters , Child , Colon/physiology , Constipation , Female , Gastrointestinal Motility/physiology , Humans , Male , Meals , Muscle Contraction/drug effects , Reflex/drug effects , SevofluraneABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine predictors of histological response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy among children with significant esophageal eosinophilia (SEE), defined as >or=15 eosinophils per high powered field (eos/hpf) on esophageal mucosal biopsy (EMB). STUDY DESIGN: Response to PPI therapy among children with SEE treated with PPI who underwent repeat EMB was studied retrospectively. Response was defined as <5 eos/hpf on repeat EMB. Characteristics of responders and nonresponders were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 326 patients (ages 1 through 18 years) diagnosed with SEE over a 7-year period, 43 (mean age, 8.5 years; 67% males) met inclusion criteria. After PPI therapy, 17 patients (40%) were responders. There were no significant differences in demographics, presenting symptoms, endoscopic, or histological findings between responders and nonresponders. Among patients with 15 to 20 eos/hpf on EMB, 50% were responders; among patients with >20 eos/hpf on EMB, 29% were responders. Seven of 17 (41%) patients with abnormal pH monitoring and 5 of 11 (45%) patients with normal monitoring were responders. CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of patients with SEE demonstrated histological response to PPI therapy. None of the clinical characteristics evaluated predicted response, and response was not dependent on results of pH study. The role of PPI therapy in treating SEE warrants further prospective investigation.
