Longitudinal Study of Visual Function in Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration at 12 Months.

PURPOSE: To report the 1-year progression of visual impairment on psychophysical tests of visual function in patients with early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with early and intermediate AMD were enrolled from the existing population at the Duke Eye Center, and healthy age-matched control participants were recruited from family members or friends of the AMD patients and from the Duke Optometry and Comprehensive Eye Clinics. METHODS: Patients and control participants recruited during the baseline study were assessed at both 6 and 12 months after the initial study visit. Measurements of visual function included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA), low-luminance deficit (LLD), microperimetry percent-reduced threshold (PRT), microperimetry average threshold (AT), and cone contrast tests (CCTs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in BCVA, LLVA, LLD, microperimetry PRT, microperimetry AT, and CCT results from baseline to 6 months and to 12 months were assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients completed the 12-month examination (19 control participants, 27 early AMD patients, and 39 intermediate AMD patients). Longitudinal analysis detected significant changes from baseline within each group in microperimetry PRT and AT and in the intermediate AMD group only for BCVA and CCT results (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Microperimetry and CCT are able to detect functional changes resulting from progression of dry AMD within a period as short as 12 months. These functional markers may be useful end points in future clinical trials that assess the effect of potential treatments for AMD.

Visual Function Metrics in Early and Intermediate Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration for Use as Clinical Trial Endpoints.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and quantify visual function metrics to be used as endpoints of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) stages and visual acuity (VA) loss in patients with early and intermediate AMD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a prospective study. METHODS: One hundred and one patients were enrolled at Duke Eye Center: 80 patients with early AMD (Age-Related Eye Disease Study [AREDS] stage 2 [n = 33] and intermediate stage 3 [n = 47]) and 21 age-matched, normal controls. A dilated retinal examination, macular pigment optical density measurements, and several functional assessments (best-corrected visual acuity, macular integrity assessment mesopic microperimety, dark adaptometry, low-luminance visual acuity [LLVA] [standard using a log 2.0 neutral density filter and computerized method], and cone contrast test [CCT]) were performed. Low-luminance deficit (LLD) was defined as the difference in numbers of letters read at standard vs low luminance. Group comparisons were performed to evaluate differences between the control and the early and intermediate AMD groups using 2-sided significance tests. RESULTS: Functional measures that significantly distinguished between normal and intermediate AMD were standard and computerized (0.5 cd/m2) LLVA, percent reduced threshold and average threshold on microperimetry, CCTs, and rod intercept on dark adaptation (P < .05). The intermediate group demonstrated deficits in microperimetry reduced threshhold, computerized LLD2, and dark adaptation (P < .05) relative to early AMD. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that LLVA, microperimetry, CCT, and dark adaptation may serve as functional measures differentiating early-to-intermediate stages of dry AMD.

Association of Low Luminance Questionnaire With Objective Functional Measures in Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose: To determine whether Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) scores are associated with objective measures of visual function in early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: Cross-sectional study of subjects with early AMD Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) stage 2, N = 33), intermediate AMD (AREDS stage 3, N = 47), and age-matched healthy controls (N = 21). Subjects were interviewed with the LLQ. Psychophysical tests performed included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mesopic microperimetry, dark adaptometry (DA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), and cone contrast test (CCT). Low luminance deficit (LLD) was the difference in the number of letters read under photopic versus low luminance settings. The relationship between LLQ and visual function test scores was assessed with linear regression. Results: Subjects with intermediate AMD had significantly lower LLQ composite scores (mean = 75.8 ± 16.7; median = 76, range [29, 97]) compared with early AMD (mean = 85.3 ± 13.3; median = 88, range [50, 100], P = 0.007) or controls (mean = 91.4 ± 6.5; median = 94, range [79, 99], P < 0.001) in the overall cohort. LLQ composite scores were associated with computerized BCVA (ß = 0.516), computerized LLVA at two background luminance (1.3 cd/m2, ß = 0.660; 0.5 cd/m2, ß = 0.489) along with their respective computerized LLDs (ß = -0.531 and -0.467), rod intercept (ß = -0.312), and CCT green (ß = 0.183) (all P < 0.05). Only the computerized LLVAs and computerized LLDs remained statistically significant after adjusting for AMD versus control status (P < 0.05). Among AMD subjects, LLQ composite scores were significantly associated with the computerized LLVAs (ß = 0.622 and 0.441) and LLDs (ß = -0.795 and -0.477) at both the 1.3 and 0.5 cd/m2 luminance levels, respectively, and these associations remained significant after adjusting for AMD severity (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Among subjects with early and intermediate AMD, LLQ scores were significantly associated with computerized LLVA and LLD. LLQ is a useful patient-centered functional measure of visual impairment in early and intermediate AMD.

Teaching Clinical Ophthalmology: Medical Student Feedback on Team Case-Based Versus Lecture Format.

OBJECTIVE: Team-based learning with case presentations in small groups in the medical school education setting allows students to be actively engaged and interactive with their peers to work through real-world clinical scenarios. Our objective is to assess the effects of this curriculum on the medical student experience. DESIGN: This study was designed to gather feedback from medical students on an ophthalmology elective regarding their experience with our newly developed team-based learning curriculum. SETTINGS: Feedback evaluations were completed by medical students at the end of their elective and consisted of both a Likert scare rating and a free-response section. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 medical students. RESULTS: Students rated the case-based sessions significantly better than traditional lecture format with respect to the overall learning experience (p = 0.004), enjoyment of learning (p < 0.001), and increasing retention and ability to apply knowledge (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong preference by medical students for team-based learning within clinical ophthalmology.