Inpatient Outcomes of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia in Those With Aortic Stenosis: A Retrospective Study of 85,000 Hospitalizations.

GOALS: To investigate the outcomes of hospitalized patients with gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in the setting of aortic stenosis (AS). BACKGROUND: Although AS is associated with gastrointestinal arteriovenous malformations, its association with GAVE, a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, remains unknown. STUDY: The National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2016 to 2019 was searched for patients admitted with a diagnosis of GAVE, with and without a history of AS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk of mortality and in-hospital complications in the GAVE/AS group compared with the GAVE-only group. RESULTS: Patients with AS had a 2-fold increase in the risk of GAVE [odds ratio (OR): 2.08, P < 0.001], with no statistically significant difference in inpatient mortality between the study groups (OR: 1.36, P = 0.268). Patients with GAVE-AS had a higher risk of hypovolemic shock (OR: 2.00, P = 0.001) and acute coronary syndromes (OR: 2.25, P < 0.001) with no difference in risk of cardiogenic shock (P = 0.695), acute kidney injury (P = 0.550), blood transfusion (P = 0.270), sepsis (P = 0.598), respiratory failure (P = 0.200), or in-hospital cardiac arrest (P = 0.638). The cost of care in patients with GAVE-AS was increased by a mean of $4729 (P = 0.022), with no increase in length of stay (P = 0.320) when compared with patients with GAVE-only. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AS have a 2-fold increase in the risk of development of GAVE. Patients with AS admitted for GAVE-related bleeding are at higher rates of hypovolemic shock, acute coronary syndrome, and higher resource utilization when compared with admitted patients with GAVE without AS.

Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Among Survivors in a Safety Net Hospital in South Bronx: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Comparison of post-intensive care syndrome between critically ill survivors with or without coronavirus disease 2019 (CovP and CovN, respectively) showed that fewer CovP were able to return to work full time at >1 year and none at <1 year after discharge and that the majority of CovP survivors were able to work part time during both evaluation periods compared to CovN.

Vanishing Lung Syndrome, or Idiopathic Giant Bullous Emphysema, with Pneumothorax, and Subcutaneous Emphysema in a 58-Year-Old Female Smoker with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

BACKGROUND Vanishing lung syndrome (VLS), also known as idiopathic giant bullous emphysema, is a rare manifestation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and usually occurs in middle-aged smokers. This report presents a 58-year-old female smoker with COPD and VLS who presented with spontaneous pneumothorax. The pneumothorax was managed with a chest tube and was later complicated by massive subcutaneous emphysema. CASE REPORT A 58-year-old woman with a past medical history of long-term smoking and COPD presented with worsening shortness of breath. Upon initial evaluation, she had tachypnea and hypoxia (SpO2 93%). Chest radiography revealed a new right-sided pneumothorax on top of extensive bullous disease, which the patient already had. The drainage of the pneumothorax was successful with a pigtail catheter. However, during the following night, after insertion of the pigtail catheter, the patient developed massive subcutaneous emphysema, which was confirmed with imaging. The patient remained hemodynamically stable, and diffuse subcutaneous crepitus was present on examination. The pigtail catheter was repositioned, resulting in complete resolution of the subcutaneous emphysema in the following 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the importance of a timely diagnosis and management of the possible presentations and complications of VLS. Complications such as pneumothorax are life-threatening and require urgent management, taking precedence over the curative treatment for VLS, surgical bullectomy.

The Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Mortality and Other Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis: An Observational Study of the United States National Inpatient Sample.

Background Recent studies have shown an increased risk of diabetes mellitus in patients with Inflammatory bowel disease. However, the impact of IBD on outcomes of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis remains unknown. Methods This is an observational analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database. The authors identified patients with a diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis and inflammatory bowel diseases. Outcomes studied were differences in risk of mortality, in-hospital outcomes and healthcare resources utilization. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed and results were adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics and comorbidities. Results No significant difference in mortality was observed in the DKA-IBD group when compared to the DKA-only group (aOR 0.55, p = 0.560). Similarly, inflammatory bowel disease had no impact on risk of sepsis (aOR 1.06, p = 0.742), acute kidney injury (aOR 1.08, p = 0.389), acute coronary syndrome (aOR 0.70, p = 0.397), ischemic stroke (aOR 1.53, p = 0.094), acute respiratory failure (aOR 1.00, p = 0.987), invasive mechanical ventilation (aOR 0.54, p = 0.225), deep vein thrombosis (aOR 1.68, p = 0.275), pulmonary embolism (aOR 2.16, p = 0.279) or cardiac arrest (aOR 1.35, p = 0.672) in diabetic ketoacidosis patients. The study group had a significant increase in length of stay (adjusted mean difference 0.63, p = 0.002) and charge of care (adjusted mean difference 3,950$, p = 0.026). Conclusion Inflammatory bowel disease is not associated with risk difference in mortality or morbidity in admitted patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, however, it does contribute to increased healthcare resources utilization.

Effect of Hospital Teaching Status on Mortality and Procedural Complications of Percutaneous Paracentesis in the United States: A Four-Year Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

Objectives Numerous previous studies investigated the impact of medical training settings on outcomes of hospitalized patients. However, the impact of teaching hospital status on outcomes of percutaneous paracentesis, to the best of our knowledge, has never been studied before. Methods Hospitalized patients who underwent percutaneous paracentesis were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019 across the United States (US) teaching and non-teaching hospitals. Outcomes studied were differences in risk of mortality, postprocedural outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed using STATA software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, US) and results were adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics and comorbidities. Results Inpatient mortality rates were significantly higher in patients undergoing paracentesis at US teaching hospitals (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.29, 95%CI 1.23-1.35, p<0.001) compared to non-teaching hospitals. Similarly, higher risk of procedural complications including hemoperitoneum (aOR 1.90, 95%CI 1.65-2.20, p<0.001), hollow viscus perforation (aOR 1.97, 95%CI 1.54-2.51, p<0.001), and vessel injury/laceration (aOR 15.3, 95%CI 2.12-110.2, p=0.007) were noticed in the study group when compared to controls. Furthermore, hospital teaching status was associated with prolonged mean length of stay (9.33 days vs 7.42 days, adjusted mean difference (aMD) 1.81, 95%CI 1.68-1.94, p<0.001) and increased charge of care ($106,014 vs $80,493, aMD $24,926, 95%CI $21,617-$28,235, p <0.001) Conclusion Hospitalized patients undergoing paracentesis in US teaching hospitals have an increased risk of mortality, postprocedural complications, prolonged length of stay, and increased charge of care when compared to non-teaching hospitals.