Topical safety and vasoconstrictive assay-based bioequivalence of a new reformulated mometasone cream.

OBJECTIVES: A new improved mometasone furoate (Elocon™) cream with an emulsification system that produces a stable emulsion has been developed. In order to register the product in various markets, it was essential to ensure the cream was topically well tolerated and that it was bioequivalent to the reference product. METHODS: Phase I clinical studies were performed to assess the local safety and tolerability upon multiple dosing of this new cream as well as to assess the single-dose bioequivalence relative to the marketed product. Bioequivalence was assessed using a vasoconstrictive assay (VCA) after a dose-duration pilot study was completed with the marketed Elocon cream. KEY FINDINGS: The new mometasone cream and its vehicle were nonirritating in healthy subjects during 21-day patch application (MCII <0.025). The positive control was moderately irritating in the same study. The pivotal VCA study enrolled 162 subjects with 105 detectors included in the analysis of bioequivalence. In the 105 detectors, the ratio (×100%) of AUEC values at ED50 for test vs. standard (90% CI) was 112.91% (105.55, 120.87), within the bioequivalence criteria of (80, 125). CONCLUSIONS: These studies supported the registration of reformulated mometasone cream in various markets.

Clinical improvement in psoriasis with specific targeting of interleukin-23.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that affects approximately 2-3% of the population worldwide and has severe effects on patients' physical and psychological well-being. The discovery that psoriasis is an immune-mediated disease has led to more targeted, effective therapies; recent advances have focused on the interleukin (IL)-12/23p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23. Evidence suggests that specific inhibition of IL-23 would result in improvement in psoriasis. Here we evaluate tildrakizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the IL-23p19 subunit, in a three-part, randomized, placebo-controlled, sequential, rising multiple-dose phase I study in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis to provide clinical proof that specific targeting of IL-23p19 results in symptomatic improvement of disease severity in human subjects. A 75% reduction in the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score (PASI75) was achieved by all subjects in parts 1 and 3 (pooled) in the 3 and 10 mg kg(-1) groups by day 196. In part 2, 10 out of 15 subjects in the 3 mg kg(-1) group and 13 out of 14 subjects in the 10 mg kg(-1) group achieved a PASI75 by day 112. Tildrakizumab demonstrated important clinical improvement in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients as demonstrated by improvements in PASI scores and histological samples.

Tildrakizumab, a novel anti-IL-23 monoclonal antibody, is unaffected by ethnic variability in Caucasian, Chinese, and Japanese subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of ethnicity on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of tildrakizumab, a novel anti-IL-23 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of psoriasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, 2-part study in healthy adult subjects. In part 1, Japanese subjects and matched Caucasian and Chinese subjects (to Japanese) were assigned to 1 of 3 cohorts and administered tildrakizumab 50, 200, or 400 mg subcutaneously (SC). In part 2, Japanese subjects received tildrakizumab 10 mg/kg IV. Pre- and post-treatment antidrug antibodies were assessed. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: 59 subjects were enrolled; 53 in part 1 and 6 in part 2. Overall geometric mean AUC∞ was 6.15, 6.05, and 6.32 day×µg/mL/mg in Japanese, Caucasian, and Chinese subjects, respectively, after administration of a single SC dose. Bioavailability was ~92%. Six out of 58 evaluable subjects were positive for post-treatment ADA; 2 of these positive subjects had reduced tildrakizumab exposure. Most AEs were mild in intensity and the most frequent treatment-related AEs were injection site hematoma (15%), injection site pain (10%), and injection site erythema (8%). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of tildrakizumab were similar in Japanese, Caucasian, and Chinese subjects. Tildrakizumab exposure increased proportionally with dose in the range of 50-400 mg. A single SC dose of 50, 200, and 400 mg or a single IV dose of 10 mg/kg was generally well tolerated.

Safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol (via Aerolizer) and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol and salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this two-way crossover, double-blind, double-dummy study, 17 adults with mild-to-moderate COPD were randomized to receive either formoterol 24 microg (2 x 12 microg via Aerolizer), or salbutamol 600 microg (6 x 100 microg via metered-dose inhaler), and the appropriate double-dummy q.i.d. at 4-h intervals for 3 consecutive days (total daily dose: 96 and 2400 microg, respectively). After a 4-7-day washout period, patients were switched to the other treatment. Treatment with high-dose formoterol and salbutamol was equally well tolerated, with no reports of serious adverse events. Both agents were associated with decreased plasma potassium (mean minimum values: 3.4 and 3.3 mmol/l for formoterol and salbutamol, respectively; P=0.914), increased serum glucose (mean maximum values: 9.0 and 8.7 mmol/l, respectively; P=0.373), and small increases in mean QTc interval (mean maximum 439 ms with both treatments; P=0.813). No clinically relevant between-treatment differences in adverse events or laboratory values occurred. Both drugs improved lung function (mean maximum forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV(1)] 2.6 l with both treatments; P=0.624), with the improvement being significantly greater with formoterol than with salbutamol on all 3 days of treatment (mean area under the curve [AUC](0-24 h) of FEV(1) formoterol vs. salbutamol on days 1-3, all P<0.05). High-dose formoterol via Aerolizer (up to 96 microg/day) has a comparable tolerability profile to that of salbutamol in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD.

Safety and tolerability of high-dose formoterol (Aerolizer) and salbutamol (pMDI) in patients with mild/moderate, persistent asthma.

This double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study evaluated the tolerability of high-dose formoterol and salbutamol. Sixteen adults with mild/moderate persistent asthma (FEV1 > or = 70% predicted) were randomized to receive either formoterol 36 microg three times daily (TID) at 5-h intervals via Aerolizer (total daily dose 108 microg), or salbutamol 600 microg TID via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (total daily dose 1800 microg) for 3 consecutive days. After a 3-7-day washout period patients received the other treatment. FEV1 was measured 15 min pre-dose and 2 h post-dose. Both formoterol and salbutamol were associated with decreased plasma potassium (mean of minimum values: 3.4 and 3.6 mmol/L, respectively; P<0.001), increased serum glucose (mean of maximum values: 8.3 and 7.9 mmol/L, respectively; P=0.021), and small increases in mean QTc interval (mean of maximum values: 428.8 and 417.4 ms, respectively; P<0.001). However, none of these effects was clinically significant. Both treatments increased FEV1 to a mean maximum of 4.6 L (P=0.613), but the mean FEV1 AUC(0-72)h for formoterol was significantly greater than for salbutamol (302.2 L h, vs. 277.4 L h; P<0.001). No patients discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events. High-dose formoterol via Aerolizer did not produce any clinically significant systemic effects in patients with mild/moderate asthma.

Tegaserod pharmacokinetics are similar in patients with severe renal insufficiency and in healthy subjects.

Tegaserod (HTF 919), a selective 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist with promotile activity throughout the gastrointestinal tract, is in development for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. In an open-label, parallel-group study, the pharmacokinetics of a single 12-mg oral dose of tegaserod in patients with severe renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis were compared with data obtained from healthy subjects matched for age, weight, height, and gender (n = 10, both). The pharmacokinetics of tegaserod were similar in both groups (AUC(0h-tz), ng.h/ml: 14.6 +/- 8.5 vs. 14.3 +/- 7.1; Cmax, ng/ml: 4.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 5.1 +/- 2.2; tmax, h: 1.0, for both). Tegaserod had similar tolerability in renally impaired patients and healthy volunteers, with adverse events largely related to the gastrointestinal pharmacological actions of the drug. Therefore, no dose adjustment of tegaserod is necessary for patients with renal insufficiency.