Transmucosal, oral controlled-release, and transdermal drug administration in human subjects: a crossover study with melatonin.

The effect of oral controlled-release (CR), oral transmucosal (buccal; TMD) and transdermal (TDD) drug delivery systems on plasma concentrations of melatonin (MT) and its principal metabolite in human subjects using a crossover, single dose design was evaluated. Twelve adult male volunteers participated in the study and received all three dosage forms on three separate occasions. All patch dosage forms were removed after 10 h of wear. Plasma concentrations of the parent drug and its metabolite, 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (MT6s) were measured by radioimmunoassay. Between-subject plasma concentrations of MT were very variable following both oral CR and TDD. Use of the oral CR system gave plasma MT profiles in some subjects that were initially similar to physiological levels, but then differed substantially from physiological in the rate of MT offset; in a few subjects, plasma MT levels remained consistently much below normal nocturnal physiological levels. Also, the ratio of metabolite to parent drug by the oral CR route was many times greater than physiological. TDD resulted in a significant delay in systemic drug levels and a gradual decline in drug delivery after patch removal, possibly due to deposition of melatonin in the skin. TDD failed to simulate the physiological plasma profile of MT (rapid achievement of steady-state blood levels and rapid decline after removal of the patch; i.e., so-called "square-wave" profile). TMD provided prompt systemic drug levels with less variability than oral CR or TDD delivery. Also, plasma MT levels fell promptly and rapidly after removal of the patch. No indication of mucosal deposition was observed. TMD was able to mimic the physiological plasma profiles of both MT and its principal metabolite.

The quinolone, flumequine, has no effect on theophylline pharmacokinetics.

The kinetics of a single i.v. dose of theophylline given either alone or with flumequine was studied in eight healthy volunteers. No statistically significant differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline (volume of distribution, elimination half-life, AUC, plasma clearance) following the two treatments. Pretreatment for 5 days with oral flumequine (400 mg, three times daily) had no significant effect on the disposition of a single i.v. dose of theophylline in healthy volunteers.