ABSTRACT
The inherited peripheral neuropathies (IPNs) are characterized by marked clinical and genetic heterogeneity and include relatively frequent presentations such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and hereditary motor neuropathy, as well as more rare conditions where peripheral neuropathy is associated with additional features. There are over 250 genes known to cause IPN-related disorders but it is estimated that in approximately 50% of affected individuals a molecular diagnosis is not achieved. In this study, we examine the diagnostic utility of whole-exome sequencing (WES) in a cohort of 50 families with 1 or more affected individuals with a molecularly undiagnosed IPN with or without additional features. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes known to cause IPN were identified in 24% (12/50) of the families. A further 22% (11/50) of families carried sequence variants in IPN genes in which the significance remains unclear. An additional 12% (6/50) of families had variants in novel IPN candidate genes, 3 of which have been published thus far as novel discoveries (KIF1A, TBCK, and MCM3AP). This study highlights the use of WES in the molecular diagnostic approach of highly heterogeneous disorders, such as IPNs, places it in context of other published neuropathy cohorts, while further highlighting associated benefits for discovery.
Subject(s)
Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease/genetics , Exome Sequencing , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/genetics , Acetyltransferases/genetics , Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease/diagnosis , Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease/pathology , Exome/genetics , Female , Humans , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Kinesins/genetics , Male , Mutation , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/pathology , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent clinical whole exome sequencing (WES) cohorts have identified unanticipated multiple genetic diagnoses in single patients. However, the frequency of multiple genetic diagnoses in families is largely unknown. AIMS: We set out to identify the rate of multiple genetic diagnoses in probands and their families referred for analysis in two national research programs in Canada. MATERIALS & METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed WES results for 802 undiagnosed probands referred over the past 5 years in either the FORGE or Care4Rare Canada WES initiatives. RESULTS: Of the 802 probands, 226 (28.2%) were diagnosed based on mutations in known disease genes. Eight (3.5%) had two or more genetic diagnoses explaining their clinical phenotype, a rate in keeping with the large published studies (average 4.3%; 1.4 - 7.2%). Seven of the 8 probands had family members with one or more of the molecularly diagnosed diseases. Consanguinity and multisystem disease appeared to increase the likelihood of multiple genetic diagnoses in a family. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of comprehensive clinical phenotyping of family members to ultimately provide accurate genetic counseling.
