ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcomas represent the largest subtype of soft tissue sarcomas. Two subgroups can be distinguished, non-uterine (NULMS) and uterine leiomyosarcomas (ULMS). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate differences in clinical features and outcome between these two subgroups. METHODS: Outcome and clinical-pathological parameters between 50 patients with NULMS and 45 patients with ULMS were assessed, and compared between both groups. Univariate and multivariable survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: Patients with ULMS presented with larger tumors when compared to patients with NULMS (p < 0.001). More patients with ULMS initially presented with metastatic disease (67% vs. 36%, p = 0.007). Most common metastatic site was lung for both subtypes (28% and 38%). Five-year overall survival (OS) rates of 82.6% and 41.2% and median OS times of 92.6 (range: 79.7-105.4) and 50.4 (range: 34.8-66.0) months were observed in patients with NULMS and ULMS, respectively (p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, initial metastatic disease remained an independent prognostic factor in terms of OS (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: At time of diagnosis ULMS were larger and more often metastasized. Therefore patients with ULMS showed unfavorable outcome when compared to NULMS. Later diagnosis might be caused by differences in symptoms and clinical presentation or a more aggressive biological tumor behavior.
Subject(s)
Leiomyosarcoma/mortality , Leiomyosarcoma/pathology , Sarcoma/mortality , Sarcoma/pathology , Uterine Neoplasms/mortality , Uterine Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Leiomyosarcoma/diagnosis , Leiomyosarcoma/epidemiology , Leiomyosarcoma/therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Outcome Assessment , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma/diagnosis , Sarcoma/epidemiology , Sarcoma/therapy , Survival Analysis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tumor Burden , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
New evidence suggests that Prostaglandin E1 (PGE-1) stimulates myocardial angiogenesis in human chronic ischemic myocardium. We sought to investigate whether PGE-1 may participate in the process of neoangiogenesis within the myocardial infarct scar. Neovascularization was investigated in 14 explanted hearts from patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, who had been bridged to heart transplantation (HTX) with PGE-1 and compared with 14 hearts from patients who did not receive PGE-1 prior to HTX. In transmural sections obtained from the left ventricular wall and containing myocardial scar tissue, CD34 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were quantified immunohistochemically to estimate capillary density and amount of angiogenesis. Additionally, to assess the hypoxic state of myocardium of the infarct border zone, hypoxia inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1alpha) was determined by immunohistochemistry and quantified by means of planimetric analysis. PGE-1-treated patients had significantly more CD34-and VEGF-positive cells in infarct areas as compared to nonPGE-1 group, respectively (CD34: 116.7 +/- 5.9 vs. 45.1 +/- 5.2 capillary profiles/mm(2), P < 0.001, and VEGF: 48.3 +/- 4.9 vs. 22.9 +/- 4.7 capillary profiles/mm(2)). HIF-1alpha enrichment (in %) as well as staining intensity (in estimated units (eU)) was significantly decreased in PGE-1-treated as compared to non-treated controls (enrichment: 11.3 +/- 2.5% vs. 19.4 +/- 4.36%; staining intensity: 0.95 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.97 +/- 0.44 eU). Our data demonstrate that PGE-1 stimulates neoangiogenesis in infarct areas adjacent to viable myocardium, via upregulation of VEGF expression. The induction of therapeutic angiogenesis along with the improved hypoxic state of chronic ischemic myocardial tissue might explain the favorable clinical outcome in PGE-1 treated patients.
