ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Medical education requires competent faculty members with the ability to create change in medical education. The focus on teacher competency are emerged as the results of medical education movements toward learner competency. The purpose of this study was to identify medical faculties competencies in their main roles and to provide a competency framework. METHOD: The integrative review approach was utilized for identifying competencies and expert opinions was conducted to assigned competencies to roles and academic ranks. The search strategies were conducted in online databases including PubMed, Scopus, WOS and Eric to detect studies published from May 2003 to May 2023. RESULTS: The identified competencies were classified to four themes including (1) essential personal competencies, (2) technical/functional competencies, (3) enabling competencies, and (4) meta-competencies. CONCLUSION: According to the results, a competency framework was proposed which is a valuable tool for various important decisions related to faculty, such as promotions and tenurship.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Emergency medical technicians (EMTs) play a pivotal role in the management and treatment chain of emergency patients and their health outcomes. Knowing the clinical reasoning pattern in prehospital procedures is of particular importance that can help to develop a correct clinical decision-making process in this group. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the clinical reasoning in EMTs and evaluate its compliance with the "illness script" theory. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2021 at Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (HUMS) by involving EMTs in two groups of experts and novices. To collect and analyze participants' mental script-based information, the "think aloud" method was used. In the content analysis of extracted protocols, two main steps were considered: 1) preparing a suitable map to compare the protocol with the base pattern and 2) quantifying the relationship between the protocol and the base pattern. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)-21 software, the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the independent t-test were used for analyzing quantitative data. RESULTS: After exploring the concordance of the clinical reasoning of EMTs with the base pattern, results showed that the components of Enabling condition and Management were consistent with the illness script strategy. Pathophysiology and Diagnosis components did not conform to the base pattern. Regarding Signs and Symptoms, these were significantly different from the classic pattern of illness script. A new component called Contextual insight was suggested for this pattern. Generally, on comparing the clinical script content of experts and novices, only two components of Pathophysiology and Diagnosis did not show any significant difference (P > 0.05) between these two groups. CONCLUSION: Results of evaluating the clinical reasoning of the under-study groups showed that in some components of the pattern, they practiced as in other medical groups, but in relation to some components, this was not the case. It is due to the different nature of the prehospital conditions. Also, there is a need to add new components to the base model, which should be considered in distinguishing between expert and novice EMTs.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Clinical reasoning is a vital aspect of physician competence. It has been the subject of academic research for decades, and various models of clinical reasoning have been proposed. The aim of the present study was to develop a theoretical model of clinical reasoning. METHODS: To conduct our study, we applied the process of theory synthesis in accordance with the Walker and Avant's approach. First, we considered clinical reasoning as a focal concept of our study. Second, a search was carried out for the period 1984-2018, using the PubMed, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, ERIC, ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases to review the literature to identify factors related to the clinical reasoning and the nature of their relationships. Third, we organized clinical reasoning into an integrated and efficient representation of the clinical reasoning. RESULTS: According to this study clinical reasoning is the iterative process of intermediation between the recalled clinical knowledge and the patient's represented problem in the clinicians' active memory. We analogize the process of clinical reasoning to the process of closure of a cognitive zipper. The recalled knowledge in clinician's memory resembles to one side of zippers teeth and the evolving representation of the patient's problem resembles the other side of zippers teeth. So, the results of this study are presented in three models: [1] multi-layer knowledge structure model, [2] problem representation model and [3] cognitive zipper model of diagnostic reasoning. CONCLUSION: We propose a developmental model of clinical reasoning. Several studies have tried to present models and theories to clarify clinical reasoning, but it seems that these theories and models could only explain part of this complex process and not the whole process. Cognitive zipper model, due to its developmental structure, can illustrate the clinical reasoning process in more details than other models do.
ABSTRACT
Clinical reasoning is a complex cognitive process that is essential to evaluate and manage a patient's medical problem. The aim of this paper was to provide a critical review of the research literature on clinical reasoning theories and models. To conduct our study, we applied the process of conducting a literature review in four stages in accordance with the approach of Carnwell and Daly. First, we defined the scope of the review as being limited to clinical reasoning theories and models in medical education. In the second stage, we conducted a search based on related words in PubMed, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, ERIC, ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases. In the third stage, we classified the results of the review into three categories, and in the fourth stage, we concluded and informed further studies. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 articles were eligible to be reviewed. Three theories and two models were recognized and classified into three categories. Several theories and models have been proposed in relation to clinical reasoning, but it seems that these theories and models could only explain part of this complex process and not the whole process. Therefore, to fulfill this gap, it may be helpful to build a Meta-model or Meta-theory, which unified all the models, and theories of clinical reasoning.
