ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Curative gastrectomy is a promising approach for the treatment of gastric cancer; however, the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for advanced cancer remains controversial. The aim of this multi-institutional study was to evaluate the feasibility of D3 gastrectomy (para-aortic lymph node dissection) for advanced gastric cancer. The surgical results of D2 and D3 gastrectomy (para-aortic lymph node dissection) were retrospectively compared. METHODS: A series of 580 advanced gastric cancer patients were registered between 1992 and 2000. Of these, 430 underwent D2 gastrectomy and 150 underwent D3 gastrectomy. Survival time, prognostic factors, postoperative morbidity/mortality, and pattern of recurrence were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in survival time between D2 and D3 patients. However, the survival times of D3 patients with tumor diameters measuring 50 to 100 mm or with pN1 disease were significantly longer than those of the corresponding D2 patients. Analysis of the survival of patients with tumor diameters measuring 50 to 100 mm revealed that D3 gastrectomy conferred a survival advantage only to patients with pN2 disease. The incidence of lymphatic recurrence was lower in D3 patients with 50- to 100-mm tumors than in the corresponding D2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: D3 gastrectomy might be beneficial in patients with advanced pN2 gastric cancer within the group with tumors measuring 50 to 100 mm. A randomized controlled trial of patients with 50- to 100-mm tumors should be performed to test the validity of this preliminary result.
Subject(s)
Gastrectomy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Regression Analysis , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic outcomes for most patients with early gastric cancer are favorable. However, mortality among these patients remains a concern. Improvements in therapeutic outcomes are being sought by studying the timing and causes of death. Here, the results of surgery were evaluated to assess the appropriate treatment and follow-up schedule for early gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 1169 patients with early gastric cancer underwent curative gastrectomy between 1992 and 1999. Survival time, prognostic factors, cause of death, and time of death were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of disease-specific survival identified lymph node metastasis as an independent prognostic factor. The anatomical extent of lymph node metastasis and the number of metastatic lymph nodes influenced the rate of recurrence. Multivariate analysis of overall survival identified age as a prognostic factor. A total of 91 patients (7.8%) from the study group died: 56 from comorbid diseases, 21 from gastric cancer, and 14 from other second primary cancers. Death from gastric cancer was frequently observed within 5 years of surgical resection, whereas death from other diseases usually occurred after 5 years. Patients who died as a result of diseases other than gastric cancer tended to be older. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate lymph node dissection is necessary for patients with early gastric cancer, particularly those with risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis. Meticulous follow-up protocols that can detect second primary cancers, together with the development of treatments for comorbid diseases, are required to improve survival.
Subject(s)
Lymphatic Metastasis , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Cause of Death , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
We performed hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for 4 patients with advanced gastric cancer who had undergone curative resection except for liver metastasis. The main antineoplastic drugs were 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mitomycin C (MMC) and cisplatin (CDDP). A catheter was inserted into the hepatic artery by interventional radiological techniques in 3 patients and operatively in 1 patient. The response rate for 4 patients was 75% (CR2, PR1, PD1). The adverse events were Grade 3/4 nausea and/or vomiting in 2 cases. The HAI chemotherapy was effective and useful for patients with advanced gastric cancer who had no unresectable lesions except for liver metastasis.
