Influencing residency choice and practice location through a longitudinal rural pipeline program.

PURPOSE: The University of Missouri School of Medicine developed the Rural Track Pipeline Program (MU-RTPP) to increase the supply and retention of rural physicians statewide. The MU-RTPP features a preadmissions program for rural students (Rural Scholars), a Summer Community Program for rising second-year students, a six-month Rural Track Clerkship (RTC) Program for third-year students, and a Rural Track Elective Program for fourth-year students. The purpose of this study is to report the specialty choices and first practice locations of Rural Scholars, RTC-only participants, and Rural Track Clerkship Plus (RTC+) participants (students who participated in the RTC Program plus an additional MU-RTPP component). METHOD: The authors compared the residency specialty choices of 48 Rural Scholars (tracked since 2002) with those of 506 nonparticipants and the residency specialty choices of 83 RTC participants and 75 RTC+ participants (tracked since 1997) with those of 840 nonparticipants. The authors calculated the relative risk (RR) for the likelihood of participants matching into primary care compared with nonparticipants and analyzed first practice location. RESULTS: Rural Scholars were more than twice as likely to match into family medicine (RR=2.6; 95% confidence interval 1.5-4.4). RTC and RTC+ participants entered primary care, especially family medicine, at rates significantly higher than nonparticipants. Over 57% of students who participated in the RTC program (and potentially other MU-RTPP offerings) chose a rural location for their first practice. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal MU-RTPP successfully recruits students for rural and primary care practice to address the health care needs of Missouri.

What criteria do faculty use when rating students as potential house officers?

Third-year medical students' grades are a combination of faculty observations, National Board of Medical Examiners examinations, and other departmental specific course requirements. Faculty evaluations include assessment of students' clinical skills, and a global rating for potential as house officer. We wished to better understand the 'potential as house officer' and to understand if these competencies were shared across the third year or unique to a given discipline. We then examined the relationship between house officer potential and performance on traditional measures of success. We analyzed the narrative comments from faculty evaluations of third-year students who faculty rated as 'Outstanding' in the house officer potential category. The low correlations found between house officer potential and traditional measures of academic success indicate that items beyond the stated learning objectives are influencing faculty evaluation of clinical students. Our data suggest that the awarding of 'potential for house officer' reflects the student's ability to work as part of a health care team. Although there appear to be common elements among the house officer comments, we also observed discipline specific differences. Given the importance placed on house officer potential, more conversation is needed to develop a common language across the third-year courses.

The case for undergraduate medical education in healthcare business and management.

Current undergraduate medical education does notprepare students to approach the intricacies of healthcare business. This absence within medical education creates significant challenges for physicians throughout their careers. The field of academic medicine has clearly documented the need for medical education to prepare students for practice management, yet there exist only a small number of attempts at exposing students to healthcare business and management. The authors argue that this curriculum must start at the level ofundergraduate medical education. Furthermore, this curriculum must possess the basic components of support, integration, practicality, application, and continuation. Fulfilling these requirements will allow for the successful adaptation of the healthcare business and management curriculum.

Evaluating the effectiveness of a Senior Mentor Program: the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine.

At the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, we developed a voluntary senior-mentor program, the Senior Teacher Educator Partnership (STEP), for first- and second-year medical students. Using qualitative research methods, we examined the impact of STEP on medical students' attitudes and then assessed the congruence of what is learned through STEP with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed to provide care to the elderly patient. STEP was found to be a successful strategy for teaching themes of recognizing the elderly within an ecological context, enhancing sympathy and empathy, emphasizing respect for elderly persons, and gaining an appreciation that aging is an individualized process. New areas identified for student learning experiences included understanding the complexity of the health care system and its impact on elderly patients, understanding the payment system, and developing skills in assessment and care coordination. A model is described for continuous enhancement of educational programs to be used to improve educational experience in geriatrics.

Problem-based learning outcomes: ten years of experience at the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine.

PURPOSE: To add to a previous publication from the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine (UMCSOM) on students' improvement in United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores after the implementation of a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum by studying the performance of ten PBL class cohorts at the UMCSOM. METHOD: Characteristics of graduating classes matriculating in both traditional and PBL curricula, 1993-2006, were compared for Medical College Admission Test component scores, undergraduate grade point averages, performance on the USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 exams, faculty contact hours, and residency directors' evaluations of UMCSOM graduates' performance in the first year of residency. RESULTS: Mean scores of six of the ten comparisons for USMLE Step 1 and six of nine comparisons for USMLE Step 2 are significantly higher (p < .01) for UMCSOM PBL students than for first-time examinees nationally. These differences cannot be accounted for by preselection of academically advantaged students, increased time on task, or reduced class size. Gains in performance continue into residency, as evidenced by program directors' perceptions of superior performance of UMCSOM PBL graduates. CONCLUSIONS: The PBL curricular changes implemented with the graduating class of 1997 resulted in higher performances on USMLEs and improved evaluations from residency program directors. These changes better prepare graduates with knowledge and skills needed to practice within a complex health care system. Outcomes reported here support the investment of financial and human resources in our PBL curriculum.