Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Respir Med Case Rep ; 43: 101851, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37124058

ABSTRACT

A 68-year-old man exhibited fever and cough three weeks prior to hospital admission after three months of ultrasonic humidifier usage. Chest computed tomography showed bilateral ground-glass opacities, lymphocyte levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were elevated (60.8%), and the histological examination of a transbronchial lung biopsy showed lymphocytic alveolitis. He gradually improved without medication after he stopped using the humidifier. Accordingly, humidifier lung was the diagnosis. Humidifier water and vapor collected from the patient's humidifier were investigated. Humidifier vapor was obtained by collecting the condensed moisture. Laboratory examinations exhibited gram-negative rods and a high concentration of endotoxin and (1 â†’ 3)-ß-D-glucan in both vapor and water. The serum-precipitating antibodies showed a stronger reaction against humidifier vapor than against humidifier water. 16S rRNA metagenomic analysis revealed a high percentage of sequences of Spirosoma lacussanchae and Sphingomonas spp. in both the humidifier vapor and water. The percentages of sequence reads were lower in humidifier vapor than in water; conversely, sequences of Pseudomonas spp. and Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium were more concentrated in the humidifier vapor than in humidifier water. Although the reason for the different bacterial ratios between humidifier vapor and water is uncertain, the bacteria that were more concentrated in humidifier vapor than in humidifier water might have been the causative antigen underlying the humidifier lung diagnosis. This is the first report to indicate the presence of causative antigens in humidifier vapor.

2.
Microbiol Resour Announc ; 12(2): e0121422, 2023 Feb 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36651784

ABSTRACT

Here, we present the complete genome sequences of 14 nontuberculous mycobacteria type strains. The addition of type strain data may provide a concrete basis for further research.

3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 103(3): 115714, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35596983

ABSTRACT

The effects of tedizolid (TZD) against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were investigated. This is possibly the first study to evaluate the MIC of TZD against Japanese Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. As TZD had a significantly lower MIC than LZD (P < 0.01), it was suggested to be a better, non-toxic alternative to LZD.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Genomics , Humans , Linezolid/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Oxazolidinones , Tetrazoles , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology
4.
Tuberculosis (Edinb) ; 134: 102199, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35367868

ABSTRACT

We aimed to validate the performance of a newly developed real-time PCR assay using cobas® MTB-RIF/INH reagent on the cobas® 6800 system for detecting isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) resistance, using Japanese Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) isolates. In total, 119 mock sputum specimens spiked with resistant MTB were tested using the cobas® MTB-RIF/INH reagent. The whole genomes of all MTB isolates were sequenced by MiSeq and analysed for mutations/indels causing drug resistance. All isolates were tested for phenotypic drug susceptibility, then MTB negative sputa were collected and pooled to prepare mock sputum specimens for the study. The sensitivity and specificity for INH resistance at a concentration equal to 3 × the limit of detection were 77.8% and 90.0%, respectively; those for RIF resistance were 91.8% and 93.5%, respectively. The sensitivities for INH and RIF were statistically different (P = 0.014), but not the specificities (P = 0.624). Twenty-two false-susceptible and two false-resistant results were obtained in INH; meanwhile, six false-susceptible and three false-resistant results were obtained in RIF. False-resistance for INH and RIF was mainly due to disputed mutations. The cobas® MTB-RIF/INH reagent showed better performance than other rapid molecular tests.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Humans , Indicators and Reagents , Isoniazid/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Rifampin/pharmacology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...