Novel cysteine substitution p.(Cys1084Tyr) causes variable expressivity of qualitative and quantitative VWF defects.

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is an extremely cysteine-rich multimeric protein that is essential for maintaining normal hemostasis. The cysteine residues of VWF monomers form intra- and intermolecular disulfide bonds that regulate its structural conformation, multimer distribution, and ultimately its hemostatic activity. In this study, we investigated and characterized the molecular and pathogenic mechanisms through which a novel cysteine variant p.(Cys1084Tyr) causes an unusual, mixed phenotype form of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Phenotypic data including bleeding scores, laboratory values, VWF multimer distribution, and desmopressin response kinetics were investigated in 5 members (2 parents and 3 daughters) of a consanguineous family. VWF synthesis and secretion were also assessed in a heterologous expression system and in a transient transgenic mouse model. Heterozygosity for p.(Cys1084Tyr) was associated with variable expressivity of qualitative VWF defects. Heterozygous individuals had reduced VWF:GPIbM (<0.40 IU/mL) and VWF:CB (<0.35 IU/mL), as well as relative reductions in high-molecular-weight multimers, consistent with type 2A VWD. In addition to these qualitative defects, homozygous individuals also displayed reduced factor VIII (FVIII):C/VWF:Ag, leading to very low FVIII levels (0.03-0.1 IU/mL) and reduced VWF:Ag (<0.40 IU/mL) and VWF:GPIbM (<0.30 IU/mL). Accelerated VWF clearance and impaired VWF secretion contributed to the fully expressed homozygous phenotype with impaired secretion arising because of disordered disulfide connectivity.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of two extended half-life FVIII concentrates (Eloctate and Adynovate) in adolescents with hemophilia A: Is there a difference?

Essentials The PK parameters of Eloctate vs Adynovate were compared using one-stage and chromogenic assays in 25 boys (12-18 years). The FVIII levels were taken at 3, 24, 48, and 72 hours following a dose of either FVIII; levels analyzed by WAPPS PK program. The PK profiles (half-life, clearance, and time to 5%, 3%, and 1%) were not statistically different for the two EHL FVIIIs. The significant interpatient variability in PK is mainly related to VWF levels (and blood group). BACKGROUND: A head-to-head comparison of the pharmokinetcs (PK) of extended half-life (EHL) factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in the same subjects has not been reported. Recently, boys (ages 12-18 years) with hemophilia A in Canada were required to switch from Eloctate to Adynovate. OBJECTIVES: Compare the PK profiles of Eloctate vs Adynovate in the same boys. METHODS: Boys switching from Eloctate to Adynovate prophylaxis had FVIII levels sampled at 3, 24, 48, and 72 hours following a regular prophylactic infusion of Eloctate and then 1-3 months later, of Adynovate. Testing was done by one-stage assay (OSA) and chromogenic assay (CA). The PK parameters were determined with the Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service (WAPPS)-Hemo PK tool. RESULTS: Twenty-five boys (mean age 15.3 years; range: 12.1-18.4; 9 O blood group) underwent switching. Mean (range) terminal half-lives with the OSA were 16.1 hours (10.4 to 23.4; Eloctate) and 16.7 hours (11.0 to 23.6; Adynovate) (NS). With the CA, these were 18.0 hours (12.0 to 25.5; Eloctate) and 16.0 hours (10.3 to 22.9; Adynovate) (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two EHL-FVIIIs in clearance, area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC), Vss, or time for FVIII levels to drop to 5%, 3%, and 1%. At the 72-h time point, mean observed FVIII levels following a mean dose of 39.3 IU/kg of Eloctate were 4.4% (OSA) and 4.4% (CA). For Adynovate, these were 5.1% (OSA) and 5.3% (CA) following similar doses. There was considerable interpatient variation in PK, mainly explained by differences in blood group/von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels. CONCLUSIONS: Eloctate and Adynovate have almost identical PK parameters. When switching from one to another no prophylaxis regimen change is needed.

Enhanced cell volume regulation: a key mechanism in local and remote ischemic preconditioning.

We have previously shown that ischemic preconditioning (IPC) protection against necrosis in whole hearts and in both fresh and cultured cardiomyocytes, as well as the improved regulatory volume decrease to hypoosmotic swelling in cardiomyocytes, is abrogated through Cl(-) channel blockade, pointing to a role for enhanced cell volume regulation in IPC. To further define this cardioprotective mechanism, cultured rabbit ventricular cardiomyocytes were preconditioned either by 10-min simulated ischemia (SI) followed by 10-min simulated reperfusion (SR), by 10-min exposure/10-min washout of remote IPC (rIPC) plasma dialysate (from rabbits subjected to repetitive limb ischemia), or by adenoviral transfection with the constitutively active PKC-ε gene. These interventions were done before cardiomyocytes were subjected to either 60- or 75-min SI/60-min SR to assess cell necrosis (by trypan blue staining), 30-min SI to assess ischemic cell swelling, or 30-min hypoosmotic (200 mosM) stress to assess cell volume regulation. Necrosis after SI/SR and both SI- and hypoosmotic stress-induced swelling was reduced in preconditioned cardiomyocytes compared with control cardiomyocytes (neither preconditioned nor transfected). These effects on necrosis and cell swelling were blocked by either Cl(-) channel blockade or dominant negative knockdown of inwardly rectifying K(+) channels with adenoviruses, suggesting that Cl(-) and K(+) movements across the sarcolemma are critical for cell volume regulation and, thereby, cell survival under hypoxic/ischemic conditions. Our results define enhanced cell volume regulation as a key common mechanism of cardioprotection by preconditioning in cardiomyocytes.

Interaction of δ and κ opioid receptors with adenosine A1 receptors mediates cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning.

Multiple initiatives are underway to harness the clinical benefits of remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) based on applying non-invasive, brief, intermittent limb ischemia/reperfusion using an external occluder. However, little is known about how rIPC induces protection in cardiomyocytes, particularly through G-protein coupled receptors. In these studies, we determined the role of opioid and adenosine receptors and their functional interactions in rIPC cardioprotection. In freshly isolated cardiomyocytes subjected to 45-min simulated ischemia followed by 60-min simulated reperfusion, we examined the ability of plasma dialysate (derived from blood obtained from rabbits remotely preconditioned by application of brief cycles of hind limb ischemia/reperfusion, rIPC dialysate) to protect cells against necrosis. rIPC dialysate and selective activation of either δ-opioid receptors or κ-opioid receptors significantly reduced the % of dead cells after simulated ischemia and simulated reperfusion. Inhibition of adenosine A1 receptors, but not adenosine A3 receptors, blocked the protection by rIPC dialysate, δ-opioid receptor and κ-opioid receptor activation. In HEK293 cells expressing either hemagglutinin A-tagged δ-opioid receptors or hemagglutinin A-tagged κ-opioid receptors, selective immunoprecipitation of adenosine A1 receptors pulled down both δ-opioid and κ-opioid receptors. This molecular association of adenosine A1 receptors with δ-opioid and κ-opioid receptors was confirmed by reverse pull-down assays. These findings strongly suggest that rIPC cardioprotection requires the activation of δ-opioid and κ-opioid receptors and relies on these receptors functionally interacting with adenosine A1 receptors.

Enhanced cell-volume regulation in cyclosporin A cardioprotection.

AIMS: Cyclosporin A (CsA) has been shown to protect against ischaemia/reperfusion injury presumably by its inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening through cyclophilin D inhibition. We examine if CsA cardioprotection involves a cell-volume regulatory mechanism. METHODS AND RESULTS: To address this issue, cultured rabbit cardiomyocytes were subjected to the following protocols: (i) cardiomyocytes were treated with 200 nM CsA either given for 10 min followed by 10 min of washout prior to 30 min hypo-osmotic stress (200 mOsm) or administered throughout 75 min simulated ischaemia/60 min simulated reperfusion. Cell necrosis and cell swelling were determined by trypan blue staining and cell-volume measurements, respectively; (ii) SPQ(6-methoxy-N-(3-sulfopropyl)quinolinium) dye loaded cardiomyocytes were treated with 200 nM CsA for 10 min followed by 10 min washout and intracellular Cl(-) concentration measured (Cl(-) efflux); (iii) 5,5',6,6'-tetrachloro-1,1',3,3'- tetraethylbenzimi-dazolylcarbocyanine iodide(JC-1) loaded cardiomyocytes were treated with 200 nM CsA to inhibit mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) dissipation (an index of mitochondria permeability transition pore opening) by either valinomycin (2 µM) or ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Cl(-) channels were blocked by indanyloxyacetic acid 94 (IAA-94, 50 µM). CsA not only significantly (P < 0.001) reduced the % of dead cells following simulated ischaemia/reperfusion but it also triggered an efflux of Cl(-), hence enhancing cardiomyocyte cell-volume regulatory response. CsA protection against cell necrosis and its effect on Cl(-) transport/volume regulation were all blocked by IAA-94. IAA-94 had no effect on ΔΨm. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that CsA protects against cell necrosis at least in part by enhancing cardiomyocyte volume regulation, and not simply by inhibiting MPTP opening.