Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 2024 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Colonoscopy is an essential tool for screening, used both as a primary approach and follow-up to an abnormal stool-based CRC screening result. Colonoscopy quality is often measured with four key indicators: bowel preparation, cecal intubation, mean withdrawal time, and adenoma detection. Colonoscopies are most often performed by gastroenterologists (GI), however, in rural and medically underserved areas non-GI providers often perform colonoscopies. This study aims to evaluate the quality and safety of screening colonoscopies performed by non-GI providers, comparing their outcomes to those of GI providers. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population. Results for quality indicators were stratified by provider type and compared. Statistical significance was determined using p < 0.05 as the threshold for all comparisons; all p-values were two-sided. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found when comparing performance by provider type. Median performance for gastroenterologists, general surgeons, and family medicine providers ranged form 98-100% for cecal intubation; 97.4-100% for bowel preparation; 57.4-88.9% for male adenoma detection rate; 47.7-62.13% for female adenoma detection rate; and 0:12:10-0:20:16 for mean withdrawal time. All provider types met and exceeded the goal metric for each of the quality indicators (p < 0.001). In this analysis, non-GI providers can be expected to perform colonoscopies with similar quality to GI providers based on performance outcomes for the key quality metrics.

2.
J Fam Pract ; 65(6): 411-2, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27474824

ABSTRACT

Yes. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban are safe and effective compared with warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. These novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are noninferior in reducing the number of strokes and systemic emboli and in lowering all-cause mortality while not increasing major bleeding complications and hemorrhagic events.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Embolism/prevention & control , Stroke/prevention & control , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Safety , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Warfarin/adverse effects
3.
Wilderness Environ Med ; 23(1): 65-9, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22260868

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the epidemiology and mortality of animal-motorcycle collisions. METHODS: A retrospective study of all motorcycle collisions recorded in the North Dakota Department of Transportation Crash Reporting System from January 2007 to December 2009 was conducted. Mortality was designated as the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-six collisions involving 798 motorcycles were included in this study; 48 of these collisions were with animals (6.3% of all motorcycle collisions). Deer were the most common animal involved (81%). Most animal-motorcycle collisions took place during nighttime with clear weather and on straight rural roads. Drivers were older in animal collisions compared with nonanimal collisions (median of 44 vs 30 years old, respectively, P < .0001). Most drivers were males, whereas most passengers were females. Helmets were worn by only 32% of drivers and 12% of passengers. There were 4 (8%; 95% CI, 3%-20%) fatal animal collisions; 9% of the collisions with large animals were fatal compared with 3% of nonanimal collisions (P = .0411). CONCLUSIONS: Animal-motorcycle collisions are a small subgroup of all motorcycle collisions, but with a high mortality rate. Efforts should be made to increase helmet usage, mitigate these collisions, and increase awareness of this problem among motorcycle riders.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/mortality , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Deer , Motorcycles , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Adult , Age Distribution , Animals , Female , Head Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , North Dakota/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Rural Population , Sex Distribution
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...