Age-Stratified Outcome in Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A NOBLE Trial Substudy.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease, patients' age may affect the clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study stratified the clinical outcome according to the age of patients treated for LMCA stenosis with PCI or CABG in the Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularization (NOBLE) study. METHODS: Patients with LMCA disease were enrolled in 36 centers in northern Europe and randomized 1:1 to treatment by PCI or CABG. Eligible patients had stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris, or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), a composite of all-cause mortality, nonprocedural myocardial infarction, any repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke. Age-stratified analysis was performed for the groups younger and older than 67 years and for patients older than 80 years. RESULTS: For patients ≥67 years, the 5-year MACCEs were 35.7 versus 22.3% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.72 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-2.33], p = 0.0004) for PCI versus CABG. The difference in MACCEs was driven by more myocardial infarctions (10.8 vs. 3.8% HR 3.01 [95% CI 1.52-5.96], p = 0.0009) and more repeat revascularizations (19.5 vs. 10.0% HR 2.01 [95% CI 1.29-3.12], p = 0.002). In patients younger than 67 years, MACCE was 20.5 versus 15.3% (HR 1.38 [95% CI 0.93-2.06], p = 0.11 for PCI versus CABG. All-cause mortality was similar after PCI and CABG in both age-groups. On multivariate analysis, age was a predictor of MACCE, along with PCI, diabetes, and SYNTAX score. CONCLUSIONS: As the overall NOBLE results show revascularization of LMCA disease, age of 67 years or older was associated with lower 5-year MACCE after CABG compared to PCI. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different in the subgroup younger than 67 years, although no significant interaction was present between age and treatment. Mortality was similar for all subgroups (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01496651).

Chronic post-operative opioid use after open cardiac surgery: A Danish population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of chronic opioid use after cardiac surgery is sparse. We therefore aimed to describe the proportion of new chronic post-operative opioid use after open cardiac surgery. METHODS: We used prospectively registered data from a national prescription registry and a clinical registry of 29 815 first-time cardiac surgeries from three Danish university hospitals. Data collection spanned from 2003 to 2016. The main outcome was chronic post-operative opioid use, defined as at least one opioid dispensing in the fourth post-operative quarter. Data were assessed for patient-level predictors of chronic post-operative opioid use, including pre-operative opioid use, opioid use at discharge, comorbidities, and procedural related variables. RESULTS: The overall proportion of post-operative opioid use was 10.6% (95% CI: 10.2-10.9). The proportion of new chronic post-operative opioid use was 5.7% (95% CI: 5.5-6.0) among pre-operative opioid naïve patients. The corresponding proportions among patients, who pre-operatively used low or high dose opioid (1-500 mg or > 500 mg cumulative morphine equivalent opioid), were 68.3% (95% CI: 66.1-70.4) and 76.3% (95% CI: 74.0-78.5) respectively. Risk factors associated with new chronic post-operative opioid use included: female gender, underweight and obesity, pre-operative comorbidities, acute surgery, ICU-time > 1 day, and post-operative complications. Strongest predictor of chronic post-operative opioid use was post-discharge use of opioid within one month after surgery (odds ratio 3.3, 95% CI: 2.8-4.0). CONCLUSION: New chronic post-operative opioid use after open cardiac surgery is common. Focus on post-discharge opioid use may help clinicians to reduce rates of new chronic opioid users.

Computed tomography fistulography of the sternum. A case report on interprofessional collaboration between radiologist and surgeon.

INTRODUCTION: Trans sternal fistula can occur after sternotomy/heart surgery. Diagnosing this can be difficult. PRESENTATION OF CASE: In this report, we present a unique case of a patient with infection of an ascending aortic prosthetic graft. This patient was oozing from the wound despite several revisions. Many fistulographies were performed before fistulography with surgeon and radiologist revealed a trans sternal fistula. DISCUSSION: Infection with Propionibacterium acnes is often difficult to diagnose. This is in line with the present case, where a surgeon guided fistulography had to be performed followed by appropriate redo surgery with succesful subsequent sternal wound healing. CONCLUSION: Our case demonstrates the importance of performing a fistulography with the presence of a surgeon, to obtain the best possible result.