ABSTRACT
It is not clear whether improvement in environmental decontamination is more efficiently achieved through changes in cleaning products, cleaning procedures, or performance of cleaning personnel. To assess the impact of cleaning performance on environmental contamination with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), we conducted a sequential trial in which a multifaceted environmental cleaning improvement intervention was introduced in a medical intensive care unit and respiratory step-down unit. The intervention included educational lectures for housekeepers and an observational programme of their activities without changes in cleaning products or written procedures. Following these interventions, the proportion of environmental sites cleaned improved from 49% to 85% (P<0.001); contamination of environmental sites declined from 21% to 8% (P<0.0001) before cleaning and from 13% to 8% (P<0.0001) after cleaning. The improved cleaning and contamination rates persisted in a washout period. In a multivariate model, cleaning thoroughness strongly influenced the degree of environmental contamination, with a 6% decline in VRE prevalence with every 10% increase in percentage of sites cleaned. These findings suggest that surface contamination with VRE is due to a failure to clean rather than to a faulty cleaning procedure or product.
Subject(s)
Decontamination/methods , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Fomites/microbiology , Housekeeping, Hospital/methods , Infection Control/methods , Vancomycin Resistance , Decontamination/standards , Disinfectants , Enterococcus/drug effects , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Housekeeping, Hospital/standards , Humans , Intensive Care UnitsABSTRACT
Rising rates of fluoroquinolone resistance in bacteria have been associated with increased fluoroquinolone use. In vitro data show differences in potency among fluoroquinolone antibiotics against gram-negative bacteria and have led to the hypothesis that rates of selection of resistant microorganisms may be affected by the choice of the specific fluoroquinolone. Because clinical data to prove this hypothesis are lacking, the aim of the present study was to determine rates of acquisition of quinolone-resistant gram-negative bacilli (QRGNB) in the fecal flora of medical intensive care unit patients before and after a formulary change from ciprofloxacin to levofloxacin. Unadjusted rate ratios for acquisition of QRGNB were 1.09 (95%CI, 1.02-1.16) for each day of ciprofloxacin use and 1.01 (95%CI, 0.87-1.17) for each day of levofloxacin use. Following adjustment for other antibiotic use, enteral feeding, APACHE II score, and nursing home admission, neither ciprofloxacin nor levofloxacin use was associated with acquisition of QRGNB. In conclusion, a formulary change from ciprofloxacin to levofloxacin was not significantly associated with an increased risk of acquisition of QRGNB.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Formularies, Hospital as Topic , Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria/drug effects , Carrier State , Feces/microbiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Gloving reduces acquisition of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species (VRE) on the hands, and it should be considered for routine inpatient care, even for contact with the intact skin of patients who may be colonized with VRE. However, gloving does not completely prevent contamination of the hands, and hand washing is necessary after glove removal.
