Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neuroreport ; 20(3): 251-6, 2009 Feb 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19188861

ABSTRACT

We understand from experience that musical contexts are formed when chords are combined according to the rules of harmony. In this study, the N1 component of the auditory-evoked potential was measured using comparable three-chord sequences; these sequences were constructed as a consecutive task (cf. C-C-C vs. Cm-Cm-Cm; control) and a cadence task (cf. C-G-C vs. C-G-Cm). In the cadence task, compared with cadences ending with a major chord (anticipated chord), those ending with a minor chord (unanticipated chord) showed a significantly larger amplitude of N1 waves. These components of auditory-evoked potentials reflect the effect of chord progression in musical perception and suggest that the musical context is recognized at least 100 ms after a chord is played.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Music/psychology , Pitch Perception/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Brain Mapping , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Sound , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Young Adult
2.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 33(3): 265-9, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16431062

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In the perception of sound lateralization a sound source exists in the side that the sound reaches an ear earlier in time or louder in intensity than the other ear. It is an imaginary phenomenon where the direction of sound is lateralized by an interaural time difference (ITD) and an interaural intensity difference (IID) of sound by both ears. It is speculated from pathophysiological findings that ITD and IID are processed by different pathways, but it has been not yet proved which of them is predominant in sound lateralization. The time difference can be traded by the intensity difference (fixed time versus intensity trade), and vice versa (fixed intensity versus time trade). In order to investigate predominance in this trade, we measured possible differences in effects by ITD and IID using two opposite trade phenomena of time versus intensity trade and intensity versus time trade. METHODS: The fixed time versus intensity trade test for selected narrow-band noise was investigated in 30 subjects with normal hearing. Using headphones, the subjects were instructed to push the button when the sound bias generated by fixed ITD (4 dB, 6 dB, 8 dB, 10 dB, 12 dB, 14 dB, 16 dB, 18 dB, 20 dB) was traded by gradually increased IID. The plot figure with fixed ITD and required IID to trade was made. It was compared with similar fixed intensity versus time trade test in 12 subjects with normal hearing. The fixed ITD (200-600 micros) was traded by gradually increased IID and the plot figure was made. RESULTS: In fixed time versus intensity trade test, each fixed ITD could be traded with an average of 6 dB of IID. On the other hand, in fixed intensity versus time trade test, ITD required to trade fixed IID increased, in proportion to fixed IID increased. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that predominance exists. In fixed time versus intensity trade test, the uniform amount of IID is required to trade the different ITD. However, in the novel fixed intensity versus time trade test, the phenomenon was in completely different manner that ITD in proportion to the given IID is required to trade.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Loudness Perception/physiology , Sound Localization/physiology , Time Perception/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Time Factors
3.
Hear Res ; 202(1-2): 248-57, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15811716

ABSTRACT

In an effort to examine the rules by which information of bilaterally applied bone-conducted signals arising from interaural time differences (ITD) and interaural intensity differences (IID) is combined, data were measured for continuous 500 Hz narrow band noise at 65-70 dB HL in 11 patients with bilateral congenital aural atresia. Time-intensity trading functions were obtained by shifting the sound image towards one side using ITD, and shifting back to a centered sound image by varying the IID in the same ear (auditory midline task). ITD values were varied from -600 to +600 micros at 200 micros steps, where negative values indicate delays to the right ear. The results indicate that time-intensity trading is present in patients with bilateral aural atresia. The gross response properties of time-intensity trading in response to bone-conducted signals were comparable in patients with bilateral aural atresia and normal-hearing subjects, though there was a larger inter-subject variability and higher discrimination thresholds across IIDs in the atresia group. These results suggest that the mature auditory brainstem has a potential to employ binaural cues later in life, although to a restricted degree. A binaural fitting of a bone-conducted hearing aid might optimize binaural hearing and improve sound lateralization, and we recommend now systematically bilateral fitting in aural atresia patients.


Subject(s)
Ear/abnormalities , Ear/physiopathology , Sound Localization , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Auditory Threshold , Bone Conduction , Case-Control Studies , Discrimination, Psychological , Ear/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Noise , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Neurosci Lett ; 345(2): 109-12, 2003 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12821183

ABSTRACT

Visual event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during an oddball paradigm (OBP) and a simple reaction paradigm (SRP) to investigate the effect of stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) on ERPs under constant and random conditions in nine healthy individuals. NA was obtained by subtracting ERPs for SRP from those to the frequent nontarget of OBP. N2 was obtained by subtracting ERPs to the frequent nontarget from those to the rare target of OBP. N1, P2, and P3 latencies during OBP were shorter, and N1 amplitude of OBP, P1, and P2 amplitude of SRP, and NA amplitude were larger under constant conditions than under random conditions. We suggest that visual information processing is faster and more effective under constant conditions than under random conditions. NA potential related to the pattern recognition processing was significantly interfered with under random conditions, whereas N2 potential related to the stimulus classification was less influenced by the rhythm. The visual selective processing activity was influenced by the SOA with the positive shift of the waveform "20% rare target of OBP-100% target of SRP" under random conditions.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiology , Choice Behavior/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology , Adult , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation , Random Allocation , Visual Perception
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...