Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 99(11): 1785-1795, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27283764

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test an intervention designed to motivate older adults in documenting their healthcare preferences in advance, and to guide proxies in making hypothetical decisions that match those of the older adult. METHODS: The trial involved 235 older adults, of which half were assisted in communicating their wishes to their proxy. Hypothetical vignettes were used at baseline and twice after the intervention to elicit older adults' preferences and assess their proxy's ability to predict them. RESULTS: By the end of the trial, 80% of older adults allocated to the experimental group had documented their wishes. Changes over time in mean accuracy scores did not differ between groups for any hypothetical situations, except when limiting the sample to dyads that were highly discordant at baseline. CONCLUSION: The intervention motivated a large proportion of older adults to express their preferences but had little effect on proxies' ability to predict them. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Educational tools developed for this study will assist healthcare providers in helping older adults to record their wishes in advance. Clients must be informed of the challenge of making substitute decisions and of the need to discuss the amount of leeway the proxy should have in interpreting expressed wishes.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , Advance Directives , Decision Making , Proxy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Preference , Residence Characteristics
3.
BMC Med Ethics ; 13: 1, 2012 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22221980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Family members are often required to act as substitute decision-makers when health care or research participation decisions must be made for an incapacitated relative. Yet most families are unable to accurately predict older adult preferences regarding future health care and willingness to engage in research studies. Discussion and documentation of preferences could improve proxies' abilities to decide for their loved ones. This trial assesses the efficacy of an advance planning intervention in improving the accuracy of substitute decision-making and increasing the frequency of documented preferences for health care and research. It also investigates the financial impact on the healthcare system of improving substitute decision-making. METHODS/DESIGN: Dyads (n = 240) comprising an older adult and his/her self-selected proxy are randomly allocated to the experimental or control group, after stratification for type of designated proxy and self-report of prior documentation of healthcare preferences. At baseline, clinical and research vignettes are used to elicit older adult preferences and assess the ability of their proxy to predict those preferences. Responses are elicited under four health states, ranging from the subject's current health state to severe dementia. For each state, we estimated the public costs of the healthcare services that would typically be provided to a patient under these scenarios. Experimental dyads are visited at home, twice, by a specially trained facilitator who communicates the dyad-specific results of the concordance assessment, helps older adults convey their wishes to their proxies, and offers assistance in completing a guide entitled My Preferences that we designed specifically for that purpose. In between these meetings, experimental dyads attend a group information session about My Preferences. Control dyads attend three monthly workshops aimed at promoting healthy behaviors. Concordance assessments are repeated at the end of the intervention and 6 months later to assess improvement in predictive accuracy and cost savings, if any. Copies of completed guides are made at the time of these assessments. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether the tested intervention guides proxies in making decisions that concur with those of older adults, motivates the latter to record their wishes in writing, and yields savings for the healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN89993391.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning , Biomedical Research , Decision Making , Family , Health Care Costs , Health Promotion , Proxy , Advance Care Planning/economics , Advance Directives , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Female , Health Behavior , Health Promotion/economics , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching
4.
Ann Pharmacother ; 45(9): e51, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21852591

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of probable domperidone-induced tardive dyskinesia and withdrawal psychosis in an elderly woman. CASE SUMMARY: A 75-year-old woman was first assessed for cognitive decline and personality changes. On clinical examination, diffuse choreoathetoid movements were noted. Chronic domperidone use seemed the most likely cause for the movement disorder and was abruptly discontinued. Within a few days, she developed a severe psychotic syndrome with Capgras delusions; the movement disorder continued unabated. Both the movement disorder and psychotic symptoms promptly remitted with risperidone treatment. DISCUSSION: Domperidone has, on rare occasions, been associated with acute extrapyramidal syndromes, especially in young children, but, to our knowledge, this is the first case of domperidone-induced tardive dyskinesia and withdrawal psychosis, adverse effects associated with chronic central nervous system dopaminergic blockade. Domperidone is a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist that does not usually cross the blood-brain barrier. However, blood-brain barrier alterations occur with aging and dementia, which may explain central nervous system penetration of domperidone in our patient, diagnosed with probable frontotemporal dementia. The association was rated as probable on the Naranjo probability scale. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic use of domperidone may, on rare occasions, induce neuropsychiatric syndromes similar to those seen with the use of antipsychotics. This may be more likely in situations in which the blood-brain barrier is damaged, as in vascular and degenerative dementias.


Subject(s)
Domperidone/adverse effects , Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced/etiology , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Aged , Blood-Brain Barrier/metabolism , Blood-Brain Barrier/pathology , Dementia/drug therapy , Domperidone/administration & dosage , Domperidone/therapeutic use , Dopamine Antagonists/administration & dosage , Dopamine Antagonists/adverse effects , Dopamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists , Female , Humans , Risperidone/therapeutic use , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...