ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Frailty is associated with worse outcomes and higher healthcare costs. The long waiting time for surgery is a potential 'teachable' moment. We examined the feasibility and safety of a pilot prehabilitation programme on high-risk frail patients undergoing major elective surgery. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective pilot study (Dec 2020-Nov 2021) on a one-stop prehabilitation programme (structured exercise training, nutritional counselling/therapy, and psychological support) in collaboration with geriatricians and allied health professionals. At least 4 weeks before surgery, patients at high risk of frailty or malnutrition, or undergoing major hepatectomy, esophagectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or radical cystectomy, were referred for prehabilitation (2-3 sessions/week). The primary outcomes were the feasibility and safety of prehabilitation. The secondary outcomes were changes in functional, emotional, and nutritional status and days alive and at home within 30 days after surgery (DAH30) associated with prehabilitation. RESULTS: Over a 12-month period, 72 out of 111 patients (64.9%) from the Perioperative Medicine Clinic were eligible for prehabilitation, of which 54 (75%) were recruited. The mean (standard deviation) age was 71.9 (6.9) years. The adherence rate to 3 weeks of prehabilitation was high in 52 (96.3%) participants. Prehabilitation improved exercise capacity (P = 0.08), enhanced some functional mobility measures (P = 0.02), and increased nutritional energy (P = 0.04) and protein intakes (P < 0.01). However, prehabilitation-related changes in muscle strength, cognitive function, and emotional resilience were minimal. The median (interquatile range) DAH30 was 19 (14-23) days. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This outpatient-based, one-stop multidisciplinary prehabilitation programme was feasible, safe, and improved several measures of patient's physiological reserve and functional capacity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05668221.
ABSTRACT
Background: Many barriers exist to the wider and sustainable implementation of basic life support (BLS) training in secondary schools. Whether trained teacher instructors are not worse than healthcare instructors by 20% (noninferiority margin) of simulated BLS skills for secondary school students is unclear. Methods: We conducted a two-armed, parallel, noninferiority, blinded, randomized controlled trial at four secondary schools in Hong Kong after teachers had undergone BLS training. Students were randomized to either the trained teacher or healthcare instructor group for the 2-hour compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator (CO-CPRAED) course. The assessors for the students' BLS skill performance six months after the CO-CPRAED course were blinded. Results: Of the 33 trained teachers, 13 (39.4%) volunteered to be instructors for the CO-CPRAED course. Three hundred and eleven students (median age: 15 years, 67% males) were randomized to either the teacher (n = 161) or healthcare (n = 150) instructor group. The BLS skill performance passing rate (%) at six months was high in both instructor groups (teacher: 88% versus healthcare: 91%; mean difference: -3%, 95% CI: -11% to 5%; P = 0.22). The students' knowledge levels remained high (>90%) and were similar between instructor groups at six months (P = 0.91). The teachers' willingness to teach BLS to students was mildly positive. However, the students were extremely positive towards learning and performing BLS. Conclusions: A brief 2-hour CO-CPRAED intervention by trained teachers was noninferior to healthcare instructors and it was associated with students' very positive attitudes towards CPR, and retention of knowledge and BLS skills.
ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of the present study was to explore the experiences and perceptions young adults had of family members who are caring for a relative with dementia. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study with semi-structured interviews was carried out and data were collected from 24 young adults recruited through purposive sampling. The participants had to have a close relative who was caring for an elderly family member with dementia. A content analysis approach was used for the verbatim transcription. RESULTS: The findings showed that caring for a relative with dementia was perceived as a time-consuming, exhausting and long-term task. The participants experienced stress and strain, although they were not the primary caregivers. Despite their negative perceptions of the task, they were willing to take on the responsibility of becoming a primary caregiver in the future. However, they intended to seek assistance in meeting their caregiving roles and responsibilities. Seeing how their close relative cared for a dependent older adult led them to reflect on what they would become in the future. Interestingly, although the participants expected their future offspring to take care of them when they became old, they did not want to be a burden to their children. CONCLUSION: Young adults are the caregivers of tomorrow. Knowing their perspective on caregiving is important if health professionals are to help them evolve into a caregiving role. It has implications for realizing the goal of aging in place. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16: 873-879.
