Isoflurane Preconditioning Alleviates Hypoxia/Reoxygenation-Induced Cardiomyocyte Injury by Inhibiting miR-195-3p Expression.

To investigate the role of microRNA-195-3p (miR-195-3p) in hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R)-induced cardiomyocyte injury. AC16 human cardiomyocyte cells were cultured and pretreated with different concentrations of isoflurane (ISO) (1%, 2%, and 3%), followed by 6 h each of hypoxia and reoxygenation to construct H/R cell models. The optimum ISO concentration was assessed based on the cell viability. miR-195-3p expression was regulated by in vitro cell transfection. Cell viability was determined by MTT assay, and apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometry. The levels of myocardial injury and inflammation were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Compared with the control group, the cell viability of the H/R group had significantly decreased and that of ISO pretreatment had increased in a dose-dependent manner. Therefore, we selected a 2% ISO concentration for pretreatment. MiR-195-3p expression had significantly increased in the H/R group and decreased after 2% ISO pretreatment. Additionally, the number of apoptotic cells and the levels of lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase-myoglobin binding, cardiac troponin I, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α had increased significantly. ISO preconditioning inhibited H/R-induced AC16 cell damage, whereas miR-195-3p overexpression reversed the protective effects of ISO on cardiomyocytes. The expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) was reduced in the H/R-induced AC16 cells, and PTEN is a downstream target gene of miR-195-3p. Preconditioning with 2% ISO plays a protective role in H/R-induced AC16 cell damage by inhibiting miR-195-3p expression.

Effect of Breathing Meditation Training on Nursing Work Quality, Occurrence Risk of Adverse Events, and Attention Level of Operating Room Nurses.

Objective: To explore the effect of breathing meditation training on nursing work quality, occurrence risk of adverse events, and attention level of operating room nurses. Methods: Taking the starting time of breathing meditation training of operating room nurses in our hospital in July 2020 as the dividing line, operating room nurses who implemented routine management from April 2020 to June 2020 were selected as the control group (n=30), and operating room nurses who carried out breathing meditation training from July 2020 to September 2020 were included in the intervention group (n=30). The emotional state [Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) score, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score], Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) score, electrocardiogram indicators (blood pressure, pulse, and respiration), electroencephalogram indicators (SMR wave, ß wave, and θ wave EEG frequency), attention level (attention quotient, visual attention, and auditory attention), nursing work quality (health education, theoretical knowledge, nursing operation, and operating room management) and the number of reported adverse events were compared between the two groups before and after training. Results: After breathing meditation training, the intervention group's Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores were significantly reduced (P < .05), while the Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) score was significantly increased (P < .05). ). In addition, blood pressure and respiratory rate were reduced in the intervention group (P < .05), with significant differences compared with the control group (P < .05). The SMR waves and beta waves in the intervention group increased (P < .05), while theta waves decreased (P < .05). Attention quotient, visual attention and auditory attention scores were improved in the intervention group compared with the control group (P < .05). The scores of health education, theoretical knowledge, nursing operations and operating room management of the intervention group after training were higher than those of the control group (P < .05). The intervention group reported a lower number of adverse events than the control group (74.42% vs. 25.58%). The application of breathing meditation training in special training for operating room nurses can effectively relieve negative emotions, enhance mindfulness scores, reduce blood pressure and respiratory rate, regulate brain wave frequency, improve attention status and quality of nursing work, and reduce the risk of adverse events. These outcomes may have a positive impact on improving the quality of nursing practice and patient care in the operating room. For operating room nurses, the negative emotional stress caused by sustained high levels of mental concentration may affect work efficiency and the entire surgical process. Breathing meditation training can enhance nurses' emotional resilience, thereby improving the efficiency and safety of operating room care. Conclusion: The application of breathing meditation training in the special training of operating room nurses can effectively alleviate negative emotions, enhance the mindfulness score, reduce blood pressure and respiratory rate, regulate brain wave frequency, improve the attention state and nursing work quality, and reduce the occurrence risk of adverse events. Future research should conduct longitudinal studies to evaluate the long-term effects of breathing meditation training on the quality of nursing work and the prevention of adverse events. Additionally, research could explore advanced neuroimaging techniques to gain structural insights, integrate meditation into existing training programs, tailor interventions for different healthcare settings, assess patient outcomes, explore technology-assisted meditation, and investigate interprofessional collaboration. Through these pathways, a more complete understanding of the impact and best integration of breath meditation in healthcare settings can be achieved, providing valuable insights into improving the well-being of healthcare professionals and potentially overall patient care and satisfaction.

Corrigendum: The effect of gut microbiota dysbiosis on patients with preeclampsia.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1022857.].

The effect of gut microbiota dysbiosis on patients with preeclampsia.

Purpose: To compare the difference of gut microbiota between preeclampsia (PE) and healthy normal pregnant women, providing new therapeutic strategy for preeclampsia. Methods: Forty-one PE patients and 45 age- and pre-pregnancy body mass index- matched healthy controls were enrolled from Nov 2021 to May 2022 in this retrospective case-control study. Fecal microbiota was detected by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, followed by bioinformatics analysis including microbial α diversity, microbial ß diversity, and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis. Serum inflammatory factors were also detected and compared between the two groups. Results: There were significant differences in Bacteroidetes (2.68% in PE patients vs 11.04% in healthy controls, P < 0.001), Proteobacteria (4.04% in PE patients vs 1.22% in healthy controls, P = 0.041), and Fusobacteria (1.07% in PE patients vs 0.01% in healthy controls, P = 0.042) between the two groups at the phylum level. Microbial α diversity was lower in PE patients than that in healthy controls. In addition, there was significant difference in microbial ß diversity between the two groups. LEfSe analysis showed that there are 24 different taxa between the two groups. The levels of proinflammatory factors including serum tumor necrosis factor-α and Interleukin-6 were statistically significant higher in PE patients than those in healthy controls (both P < 0.001), while there were no significant differences in the levels of serum anti-inflammatory factors including Interleukin-4 and Interleukin-10 between the two groups (P = 0.234 and P = 0.096, respectively). Conclusion: PE patients demonstrated gut microbiota disturbances and increasing serum proinflammatory factors, leading to a better understanding of the relationship between the gut microbiota dysbiosis and PE.