Aortic calcification: A postmortem CT validation study in a middle-aged population.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT)-detected aortic calcification is strongly associated with aortic stiffness and is an accurate predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and cognitive decline. Some previous pathologic studies have shown calcium accumulation in the medial layer of the vessel wall, while others have suggested localisation in the atherosclerotic intimal layer. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to histologically validate CT findings of aortic calcification for detectability and location in the aortic wall. METHODS: We acquired postmortem CT images and collected 170 aortic tissue samples from five different locations in the thoracic and abdominal aorta of 40 individuals who underwent autopsy. Microscopic slides were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and elastic van Gieson stain. Calcified lesions were characterised and calcifications were manually annotated in the intima and media. The presence and morphology of calcifications were scored on CT images. RESULTS: The mean age of the autopsied individuals was 63 years, and 28 % died of cardiovascular disease. Calcifications were present in 74/170 (44 %) samples. Calcification was more common in the abdominal aorta than in the thoracic aorta. In all samples with calcifications, 99 % were located in the intimal layer. Only 16/170 samples had a small amount of medial arterial calcification. The histological results showed an 85 % concordance for the presence or absence of CT calcifications. There was complete inter-method agreement for annularity of calcifications in 68 % of the samples (linear weighted kappa 0.68 (95 %CI 0.60-0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic calcifications visible on CT are located in the intimal layer of the abdominal aorta wall, at least in aortas that are not aneurysmatic or dissected. The presence and annularity of these calcifications can be reliably determined by CT.

Left ventricular remodeling following aortic root and ascending aneurysm repair.

Objective: Adverse left ventricular remodeling due to a mismatch between stiffness of native aortic tissue and current polyester grafts may be under-recognized. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of proximal aortic replacement on adverse remodeling of the left ventricle. Materials and methods: All aortic root and ascending aortic aneurysm patients were identified (n = 2,001, 2006-2019). The study cohort consisted of a subset of patients (n = 98) with two or more electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated CT angiograms, but without concomitant aortic valve disease or bicuspid aortic valve, connective tissue disease, acute aortic syndrome or prior history of aortic repair or mitral valve surgery. LV myocardial mass was measured from CT data and indexed to body surface area (LVMI). The study cohort was divided into a surgery group (n = 47) and a control group; optimal medical therapy group (OMT, n = 51). Results: The mean age was 60 ± 11 years (80% male). Beta-blocker use was significantly more frequent in the surgery group (89 vs. 57%, p < 0.001), whereas, all other antihypertensive drugs were more frequent in the OMT group. The average follow-up was 9.1 ± 4.0 months for the surgery group and 13.7 ± 6.3 months for the OMT group. Average LVMI at baseline was similar in both groups (p = 0.934). LVMI increased significantly in the surgery group compared to the OMT group (3.7 ± 4.1 vs. 0.6 ± 4.4 g/m2, p = 0.001). Surgery, baseline LVMI, age, and sex were found to be independent predictors of LVMI increased on multivariable analysis. Conclusion: Proximal aortic repair with stiff polyester grafts was associated with increased LV mass in the first-year post-operative and may promote long-term adverse cardiac remodeling. Further studies should be considered to evaluate the competing effects of aortic aneurysm related mortality against risks of long-term graft induced aortic stiffening and the potential implications on current size thresholds for intervention.

Vascular Deformation Mapping for CT Surveillance of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Growth.

Background Aortic diameter measurements in patients with a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) show wide variation. There is no technique to quantify aortic growth in a three-dimensional (3D) manner. Purpose To validate a CT-based technique for quantification of 3D growth based on deformable registration in patients with TAA. Materials and Methods Patients with ascending and descending TAA with two or more CT angiography studies between 2006 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. The 3D aortic growth was quantified using vascular deformation mapping (VDM), a technique that uses deformable registration to warp a mesh constructed from baseline aortic anatomy. Growth assessments between VDM and clinical CT diameter measurements were compared. Aortic growth was quantified as the ratio of change in surface area at each mesh element (area ratio). Manual segmentations were performed by independent raters to assess interrater reproducibility. Registration error was assessed using manually placed landmarks. Agreement between VDM and clinical diameter measurements was assessed using Pearson correlation and Cohen κ coefficients. Results A total of 38 patients (68 surveillance intervals) were evaluated (mean age, 69 years ± 9 [standard deviation]; 21 women), with TAA involving the ascending aorta (n = 26), descending aorta (n = 10), or both (n = 2). VDM was technically successful in 35 of 38 (92%) patients and 58 of 68 intervals (85%). Median registration error was 0.77 mm (interquartile range, 0.54-1.10 mm). Interrater agreement was high for aortic segmentation (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.97 ± 0.02) and VDM-derived area ratio (bias = 0.0, limits of agreement: -0.03 to 0.03). There was strong agreement (r = 0.85, P < .001) between peak area ratio values and diameter change. VDM detected growth in 14 of 58 (24%) intervals. VDM revealed growth outside the maximally dilated segment in six of 14 (36%) growth intervals, none of which were detected with diameter measurements. Conclusion Vascular deformation mapping provided reliable and comprehensive quantitative assessment of three-dimensional aortic growth and growth patterns in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms undergoing CT surveillance. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Wieben in this issue.

Imaging surveillance after open aortic repair: a feasibility study of three-dimensional growth mapping.

OBJECTIVES: Confident growth assessment during imaging follow-up is often limited by substantial variability of diameter measurements and the fact that growth does not always occur at standard measurement locations. There is a need for imaging-based techniques to more accurately assess growth. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of a three-dimensional aortic growth assessment technique to quantify aortic growth in patients following open aortic repair. METHODS: Three-dimensional aortic growth was measured using vascular deformation mapping (VDM), a technique which quantifies the localized rate of volumetric growth at the aortic wall, expressed in units of Jacobian (J) per year. We included 16 patients and analysed 6 aortic segments per patient (96 total segments). Growth was assessed by 3 metrics: clinically reported diameters, Jacobian determinant and targeted diameter re-measurements. RESULTS: VDM was able to clearly depict the presence or absence of localized aortic growth and allows for an assessment of the distribution of growth and its relation to anatomic landmarks (e.g. anastomoses, branch arteries). Targeted diameter change showed a stronger and significant correlation with J (r = 0.20, P = 0.047) compared to clinical diameter change (r = 0.15, P = 0.141). Among 20/96 (21%) segments with growth identified by VDM, growth was confirmed by clinical measurements in 7 and targeted re-measurements in 11. Agreement of growth assessments between VDM and diameter measurements was slightly higher for targeted re-measurements (kappa = 0.38) compared to clinical measurements (kappa = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic growth is often uncertain and underappreciated when assessed via standard diameter measurements. Three-dimensional growth assessment with VDM offers a more comprehensive assessment of growth, allows for targeted diameter measurements and could be an additional tool to determine which post-surgical patients at high and low risk for future complications.

Endovascular ascending aortic repair in type A dissection: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Up to 10% of acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) patients are deemed unfit for open surgical repair, exposing these patients to high mortality rates. In recent years, thoracic endovascular aortic repair has proven to be a promising alternative treatment modality in specific cases. This study presents a comprehensive overview of the current state of catheter-based interventions in the setting of primary TAAD. METHODS: A literature search was conducted, using MEDLINE and PubMed databases according to PRISMA guidelines, updated until January 2020. Articles were selected if they reported on the endovascular repair of DeBakey Type I and II aortic dissections. The exclusion criteria were retrograde type A dissection, hybrid procedures, and combined outcome reporting of mixed aortic pathologies (e.g., pseudoaneurysm and intramural hematoma). RESULTS: A total of 31 articles, out of which 19 were case reports and 12 case series, describing a total of 92 patients, were included. The median follow-up was 6 months for case reports and the average follow-up was 14 months for case series. Overall technical success was 95.6% and 30-day mortality of 9%. Stroke and early endoleak rates were 6% and 18%, respectively. Reintervention was required in 14 patients (15%). CONCLUSION: This review not only demonstrates that endovascular repair in the setting of isolated TAAD is feasible with acceptable outcomes at short-term follow-up, but also underlines a lack of mid-late outcomes and reporting consistency. Studies with longer follow-up and careful consideration of patient selection are required before endovascular interventions can be widely introduced.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in the Setting of Compromised Distal Landing Zones.

BACKGROUND: The short-term and intermediate-term outcomes of two distinct approaches to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending aortic aneurysms in patients with compromised distal landing zones are reported. METHODS: Fifty-one patients (38 female, average age 72 ± 9 years) underwent 55 TEVARs (2008 to 2018) for aneurysmal disease. Inclusion criteria consisted of TEVAR in a compromised distal landing zone, defined as follows: diameter 3.5 cm or greater; cross-sectional thrombus 50% or greater; or 25% or greater circumferential mural calcification in the 2 cm supraceliac aorta; or tortuosity index of 1.1 or more over the 10 cm supraceliac aorta. Treatment cohorts were (1) TEVAR alone (n = 29), and (2) TEVAR with adjunct consisting of visceral snorkel graft with distal stent extension (n = 20) or EndoAnchors (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN [n = 6]). RESULTS: Perioperative complication rate was 20%. Thirty-day mortality was 5% including one access-site related intraoperative death and one postoperative death from embolic mesenteric ischemia. Median clinical follow-up was 2.2 years. Intermediate-term outcomes include type 1B endoleaks, 35%; 0.5 cm or more per year maximal aortic diameter growth, 9%; reintervention, 15%; and all-cause mortality, 25%. The distal landing zone diameter increased by 0.3 cm per year in the TEVAR alone cohort; however, it decreased by 0.1 cm per year in the adjunct cohort ( P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is a viable alternative for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with compromised distal landing zones, although these patients may benefit significantly from the development of branched thoracoabdominal devices. In the interim, the use of TEVAR adjuncts may limit progressive degeneration of the distal landing zone in this patient population.

Important issues regarding planning and sizing for emergent TEVAR.

In the past decades, treatment of acute thoracic aortic syndrome underwent drastic changes with a central role for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). One of the essential factors in the success of TEVAR is accurate sizing of the endograft, as both under- and oversizing can lead to suboptimal results and disastrous complications. The aim of this review was to give an overview of issues regarding endograft sizing in emergent TEVAR. Sizing of the endograft can be complicated by specific factors related to the underlying disease. For instance, different types of the acute thoracic aortic syndrome, i.e. blunt thoracic injury, thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection with concomitant rupture are associated with hemorrhagic shock and the need for resuscitation, which leads to profound changes in diameter of the thoracic aorta. These diameter changes should be taken into account during endograft sizing. Measuring the thoracic aorta based on the admission CTA can lead to inaccurate sizing, even if proper centerline-based measurements are performed. The use of real-time imaging, in particular intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), has been shown to provide more accurate endograft sizing in acute thoracic aortic syndromes, especially if associated with hypovolemia. Future research should provide additional data on the exact role of different intra-operative imaging modalities (e.g. IVUS, transesophageal echocardiography [TEE], three dimensional CTA) on endograft sizing and long-term outcomes to ultimately improve patient outcome.

Critical appraisal of multidimensional CT measurements following acute open repair of type A aortic dissection.

INTRODUCTION: To identify patients with aneurysmal degeneration of the native aorta following type A aortic dissection (TAAD), reproducible serial measurements of aortic dimensions are critical. We used a systematic workflow for measuring aortic geometry following TAAD, using computed tomography angiography data, and test its reproducibility. METHODS: The workflow for aortic measurements included centerline generation, luminal diameter, and area measurement at six anatomically defined locations along the aorta and luminal volumetric measurements in the descending aorta. Two independent observers measured the aortic geometry in 20 surgically repaired TAAD patients, preoperatively and at 3 months follow-up. To test reproducibility, intraobserver and interobserver agreement scores were analyzed using a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). RESULTS: The interobserver agreement scores of the diameter, area, and volumetric measurements in the descending aorta were acceptable. The agreement scores of the area measurements were highest, with CCCs ranging from 0.909 to 0.984. Luminal diameter measurements scored lower than luminal area measurements and were least reproducible at the mid aortic arch (CCC < 0.886). Overall, intraobserver agreement scores were better than interobserver agreement scores (SD of mean difference was 1.89 vs 1.94 for intraobserver vs interobserver diameter measurements, and 0.61 vs 0.66 for area measurements). CONCLUSION: Although overall reproducibility was acceptable in descending aortic measurements, our results show that it remains challenging to reliably measure luminal diameters, compared with areas. To aid identification of early adverse remodeling following acute TAAD, novel two- and three-dimensional measurement techniques are needed that capture locoregional changes in the false lumen and true lumen morphology more accurately.

Mapping pre-dissection aortic wall abnormalities: a multiparametric assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Maximal aortic diameter is commonly used to assess aortic risk but poorly predicts the timing and location of dissection events in patients with connective tissue disease who undergo regular imaging surveillance. Hence, we aimed to use available surveillance computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans to investigate the correlation between 3-dimensional (3D) growth and cyclic transmural wall stress with the location of intimal tear formation. METHODS: Three type B aortic dissection patients with 2 available electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated pre-dissection CTA scans and without surgical repair during the pre-dissection interval were retrospectively identified at our institution. Vascular deformation mapping was used to measure 3D aortic growth between 2 pre-dissection clinical CTA studies. In addition, we performed a computational analysis to estimate cyclic transmural wall stress in patient-specific baseline CTA geometries. RESULTS: In all 3 connective tissue disease patients, the site of type B aortic intimal tear co-localized with areas of peak 3D aortic wall growth. Aortic growth was detected by clinical radiological assessment in only 1 case. Co-localization of peak transmural stress and the site of intimal tear formation were found in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Focal areas of growth and transmural wall stress co-localized with the site of intimal tear formation. These hypothesis-generating results suggest a possible new analytic pathway for a more sophisticated assessment of the factors leading to the initiation of dissection in patients with connective tissue disease. These methods could improve on current risk-stratification techniques.

False lumen ejection fraction predicts growth in type B aortic dissection: preliminary results.

OBJECTIVES: Current risk assessment strategies in type B aortic dissection are focused on anatomic parameters, although haemodynamic abnormalities that result in false lumen (FL) pressurization are thought to play a significant role in aortic growth. The objective of this study was to evaluate blood flow of the FL using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and identify haemodynamic and anatomic factors that independently predict the rate of aortic growth. METHODS: Patients with dissection of the descending thoraco-abdominal aorta (n = 18) were enrolled in a prospective observational study and underwent 4D flow MRI for haemodynamic assessment of the entry tear and FL. Anatomic parameters were obtained by magnetic resonance angiography and baseline computed tomography. False lumen ejection fraction (FL EF) was defined the ratio of retrograde flow rate at the dominant entry tear during diastole over the antegrade systolic flow rate. RESULTS: The median aortic growth rate was 3.5 mm/year (interquartile range 0.5-8.1 mm/year). Entry tear peak velocity was lower in patients with enlarging aortic dimensions (95.5 ± 24.1 vs 128.1 ± 37.4 cm/s, P = 0.039). After adjusting for co-variates FL EF (ß = 0.15, P = 0.004), baseline maximal aortic diameter (ß = 0.37, P = 0.001) and the entry tear distance from the left subclavian artery (ß = 0.07, P = 0.016) were significant predictors of aortic growth rate. CONCLUSIONS: Beyond standard anatomic risk factors, FL EF is an independent predictor of aortic growth rate and may represent an intuitive, non-invasive method to estimate FL pressurization and improve patient-specific risk assessment in patients with type B aortic dissection.

Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Managing More Than Just the Entry-Tear.

As emergency repair for acute type A aortic dissection is improving, the reintervention rate increases. Over 10% of cases require an aortic reintervention, which should ideally be performed in an early stage to allow for positive aortic remodeling and to prevent limitations by the stiffened aortic flap. These reinterventions remain a surgical challenge and may come with complications. We provide a comprehensive overview of different management strategies and their success in treating aortic adverse remodelling, based on current evidence of the literature. Two meta-analyses and an additional literature search yielded comparable mortality rates between limited repair and extensive repair. Cardiopulmonary bypass time, cross clamping time and cardiac arrest time were significantly shorter in limited repairs. Reintervention rate was generally lower in extensive repair, although not always significant. In conclusion, the early aggressive approach may be useful to lower reintervention rates. However, it has not yet been proven to be more beneficial. It will be imperative to develop a patient-specific early stage prediction model for residual aortic reintervention.

Identifying and addressing the limitations of EVAR technology.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has improved over the last two decades. Approximately 80% of the patients presenting with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is nowadays primarily treated with EVAR. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the differences between endovascular and open repair, the clinical characteristics needed for EVAR, the role of clinical imaging and the developments in EVAR technology will be discussed. Early mortality is lower in EVAR as compared to open repair, whereas this benefit is lost after 3 years postoperatively. EVAR comes with a high reintervention rate, with endoleak being the most important predictive factor for reintervention. Expanding technical possibilities have allowed surgeons to choose from a palate of endovascular approaches in aneurysm patients with challenging anatomies. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Although EVAR has taken a giant leap forward in development, the new developments have seemed to surpass the long-term limitations with older devices. It is important to start focusing on the current limitations of EVAR, in particular the durability of devices in the human variable anatomic and dynamic environment.