Patient Preferences for Telemedicine Video Backgrounds.

This cross-sectional study assesses patient preferences for various visual backgrounds during telemedicine video visits.

Empathy Among Physicians and Nurses in Japan: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Empathy with patients improves clinical outcomes. Although previous studies have shown no significant differences in empathy levels between physicians and nurses, investigations have not considered differences in cultural backgrounds and related factors of healthcare providers at the individual level. OBJECTIVE: This study compares empathy between physicians and nurses in Japan and identifies relevant factors that contribute to these differences. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey design was used in the study. The online survey was conducted using the Nikkei Medical Online website. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5441 physicians and 965 nurses in Japan who were registered as members of Nikkei Medical Online were included. MAIN MEASURES: Empathy was measured by the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE). KEY RESULTS: Cronbach's α was 0.89. The mean JSE score for Japanese physicians was significantly lower at 100.05 (SD = 15.75) than the mean score of 110.63 (SD = 12.25) for nurses (p<0.001). In related factors, higher age (increasing by one year) (+0.29; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.32; p<0.001), self-identified female gender (+5.45; 95% CI 4.40 to 6.49; p<0.001), having children (+1.20; 95% CI 0.30 to 2.10; p=0.009), and working at a hospital with 20-99 beds (+1.73; 95% CI 0.03 to 3.43; p=0.046) were significantly associated with higher scores, whereas those whose mother is a physician (-6.65; 95% CI -8.82 to -4.47; p<0.001) and father is a nurse (-9.53; 95% CI -16.54 to -2.52; p=0.008) or co-medical professional (-3.85; 95% CI -5.49 to -2.21; p<0.001) were significantly associated with lower scores. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians had significantly lower scores on the JSE than nurses in Japan. Higher age, self-identified female gender, having children, working at a small hospital, having a mother who is a physician, and having a father who is a nurse or co-medical professional were factors associated with the level of empathy.

Association between mentorship and mental health among junior residents: A nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.

Background: Mentorship is a dynamic, reciprocal relationship in which an advanced careerist (mentor) encourages the growth of a novice (mentee). Mentorship may protect the mental health of residents at risk for depression and burnout, yet despite its frequent use and known benefits, limited reports exist regarding the prevalence and mental effects of mentorship on residents in Japan. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving postgraduate year 1 and 2 (PGY-1 and PGY-2) residents in Japan who took the General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE) at the end of the 2021 academic year. Data on mentorship were collected using surveys administered immediately following GM-ITE completion. The primary outcome was the Patient Health Questionaire-2 (PHQ-2), which consisted depressed mood and loss of interest. A positive response for either item indicated PHQ-2 positive. We examined associations between self-reported mentorship and PHQ-2 by multi-level analysis. Results: Of 4929 residents, 3266 (66.3%) residents reported having at least one mentor. Compared to residents without any mentor, those with a mentor were associated with a lower likelihood of a positive PHQ-2 response (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.65-0.86). Mentor characteristic significantly associated with negative PHQ-2 response was a formal mentor (aOR; 0.68; 95% CI 0.55-0.84). Conclusions: A mentor-based support system was positively associated with residents' mental health. Further research is needed to determine the quality of mentorship during clinical residency in Japan.

Differences in empathy levels among physicians based on specialty: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE OF STUDY: A physician's ability to empathize is crucial for patient health outcomes, and this differs according to speciality, personal characteristics, and environmental factors. This study aimed to examine the empathy levels among physicians based on their specialities and to identify the influencing factors. STUDY DESIGN: A nationwide, online, cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Nikkei Business Publication online physician member homepage. Participants were 5441 physicians in Japan registered as members of Nikkei Medical Online across 20 specialities. We used the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) to measure the physicians' empathy levels. Cronbach's alpha was 0.84. RESULTS: The mean JSE score was 100.05, SD = 15.75. Multivariate analyses showed that the highest JSE scores were for general medicine [+5.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.60-8.56], general surgery (+3.63, 95% CI 0.97-6.28), psychiatry (+3.47, 95% CI 1.76-5.17), and paediatrics (+1.92, 95% CI 0.11-3.73). Factors associated with higher JSE scores were being female (+5.86, 95% CI 4.68-7.04), managers (+1.11, 95% CI 0.16-2.07), working in a small hospital (+2.19, 95% CI 0.23-4.15), and with children (+3.32, 95% CI 2.29-4.36). CONCLUSIONS: A significant decrease in the empathy levels was found when the parent of the participant was also a medical provider. Being a general medicine physician or a female physician in a high position who has children was positively and significantly correlated with high empathy levels.

Empathy competence and future specialty among medical residents in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Empathy is essential for physicians to provide patient-centered care. Nevertheless, the degree to which empathy varies among medical residents based on their desired future specialty remains undetermined. This nationwide cross-sectional study compared empathy levels (Jefferson Scale of Empathy, JSE) of 824 year one and two postgraduate residents in Japan by intended medical specialty, individual characteristics, and training and working environment characteristics. Empathy levels were compared with applicants for general medicine, which emphasizes patient-centeredness. The highest mean JSE and the highest percentage of women residents were observed in general medicine (M = 109.74; SD = 14.04), followed by dermatology (M = 106.64; SD = 16.90), obstetrics and gynecology (M = 106.48; SD = 14.31), and pediatrics (106.02; SD 12.18). Residents interested in procedure-centered departments (e.g. ophthalmology, orthopedics) garnered lower JSE scores. Multivariate regression revealed that future general medicine candidates achieved the highest JSE scores ([Formula: see text] = 6.68, 95% CI 2.39-10.9, p = 0.002). Women achieved significantly higher JSE scores than men ([Formula: see text] = 2.42, 95% CI 0.11-4.73, p = 0.041). The results have implications for empathy training and postgraduate education strategy in different clinical specialties.

Enhancing Resident Education by Embedding Improvement Specialists Into a Quality and Safety Curriculum.

Background: Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) curricula are critical in graduate medical education, yet barriers limit the educational experience and project outcomes. Objective: To explore the impact of QIPS curricular enhancements and integration of continuous improvement specialists (CIS) by examining the A3 document, the primary project product and surrogate for project quality. Methods: Since 2009, University of Michigan internal medicine and medicine-pediatric residents participate in a QIPS curriculum, which includes a 4-week group project. In 2016, residency leaders collaborated with CIS staff, non-clinical experts in QIPS with backgrounds in engineering and business, to improve the curriculum. Informed by a needs assessment, the intervention was implemented in 2017 and consisted of a set of enhancements including integration of CIS staff into groups as co-facilitators. In this retrospective cohort study, a blinded reviewer evaluated all available A3 documents before and after the intervention using a quantitative analysis tool. Results: All residents participated in the curriculum during the pre-intervention (July 2009 to June 2016, n=351) and post-intervention (July 2017 to June 2020, n=148) periods. A total of 23 of 84 (27%) pre-intervention and 31 of 34 (91%) post-intervention A3 documents were available for review. Scores improved significantly for 17 of 23 (74%) A3 items and for 7 of 8 (88%) sections. Mean A3 total scores increased from 29.0 to 47.0 (95% CI 12.6-23.4; P<.001) out of a possible 69.0. Conclusions: Embedding CIS experts into residency QIPS curricula is associated with improved A3 document quality.

Medical resident's pursuing specialty and differences in clinical proficiency among medical residents in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

IMPORTANCE: Standardized examinations assess both learners and training programs within the medical training system in Japan. However, it is unknown if there is an association between clinical proficiency as assessed by the General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE) and pursuing specialty. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative achievement of fundamental skills as assessed by the standardized GM-ITE based on pursuing career specialty among residents in the Japanese training system. DESIGN: Nationwide cross-sectional study. SETTING: Medical residents in Japan who attempted the GM-ITE in their first or second year were surveyed. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4,363 postgraduate years 1 and 2 residents who completed the GM-ITE were surveyed between January 18 and March 31, 2021. MAIN MEASURES: GM-ITE total scores and individual scores in each of four domains assessing clinical knowledge: 1) medical interview and professionalism, 2) symptomatology and clinical reasoning, 3) physical examination and treatment, and 4) detailed disease knowledge. RESULTS: When compared to the most pursued specialty, internal medicine, only those residents who chose general medicine achieved higher GM-ITE scores (coefficient 1.38, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.68, p = 0.038). Conversely, the nine specialties and "Other/Not decided" groups scored significantly lower. Higher scores were noted among residents entering general medicine, emergency medicine, and internal medicine and among those who trained in community hospitals with higher numbers of beds, were more advanced in their training, spent more time working and studying, and cared for a moderate but not an extreme number of patients at a time. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of basic skill achievement differed depending on respective chosen future specialties among residents in Japan. Scores were higher among those pursuing careers in general medical fields and lower among those pursuing highly specialized careers. Residents in training programs devoid of specialty-specific competition may not possess the same motivations as those in competitive systems.

Use of opioids for refractory dyspnoea in hospitalised patients with serious illness: a narrative review.

Refractory dyspnoea can be a challenging symptom to manage. Palliative care specialists are not always available for consultation, and while many clinicians may undergo training in palliative care, this education is not universal. Opioids are the most studied and prescribed pharmacological intervention for refractory dyspnoea; however, many clinicians hesitate to prescribe opioids due to regulatory concerns and fear of adverse effects. Current evidence suggests that rates of severe adverse effects, including respiratory depression and hypotension, are low when opioids are administered for refractory dyspnoea. Therefore, systemic, short-acting opioids are a recommended and safe option for the palliation of refractory dyspnoea in patients with serious illness, especially in a hospital setting that facilitates close observation. In this narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiology of dyspnoea; facilitate an evidence-based discussion on the concerns, considerations and complications associated with opioid administration for refractory dyspnoea; and describe one approach to managing refractory dyspnoea.

Exploring Sacred Moments in Hospitalized Patients: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: "Sacred moments" are brief periods of time in which people experience a deep interconnectedness that may possess spiritual qualities and emotions. This concept has been shown to have a positive impact on individuals' overall well-being and stress in mental health settings. The concept of sacred moments has not been studied in acute care hospital settings. OBJECTIVE: To better understand the occurrence of sacred moments among hospitalized patients and their healthcare workers. DESIGN: An exploratory qualitative study that included in-depth interviews with patients and healthcare workers at two academic medical centers in the Midwestern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Hospital healthcare workers (e.g., physicians, nurses, ancillary staff) and discharged patients with a recent hospital stay. APPROACH: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 30 participants between August 2020 and April 2021. Interviews were recorded and transcribed before conducting thematic analysis. KEY RESULTS: Both healthcare workers and patients reported having experienced at least one sacred moment. Interview findings were organized into three main domains including (1) several common elements described by participants as marking these moments; (2) benefits experienced by both patients and healthcare workers; and (3) suggestions for fostering sacred moments within the hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS: Among our participants, sacred moments were extremely common with the vast majority reporting to have experienced at least one in their lifetime. These moments were described as profound and important and shared many common elements. Our findings can be used to help recognize, understand, and promote sacred moments between hospitalized patients and healthcare workers.

International patient preferences for physician attire: results from cross-sectional studies in four countries across three continents.

OBJECTIVE: The patient-physician relationship impacts patients' experiences and health outcomes. Physician attire is a form of nonverbal communication that influences this relationship. Prior studies examining attire preferences suffered from heterogeneous measurement and limited context. We thus performed a multicentre, cross-sectional study using a standardised survey instrument to compare patient preferences for physician dress in international settings. SETTING: 20 hospitals and healthcare practices in Italy, Japan, Switzerland and the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 9171 adult patients receiving care in academic hospitals, general medicine clinics, specialty clinics and ophthalmology practices. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The survey was randomised and included photographs of a male or female physician dressed in assorted forms of attire. The primary outcome measure was attire preference, comprised of composite ratings across five domains: how knowledgeable, trustworthy, caring and approachable the physician appeared, and how comfortable the respondent felt. Secondary outcome measures included variation in preferences by country, physician type and respondent characteristics. RESULTS: The highest rated forms of attire differed by country, although each most preferred attire with white coat. Low ratings were conferred on attire extremes (casual and business suit). Preferences were more uniform for certain physician types. For example, among all respondents, scrubs garnered the highest rating for emergency department physicians (44.2%) and surgeons (42.4%). However, attire preferences diverged for primary care and hospital physicians. All types of formal attire were more strongly preferred in the USA than elsewhere. Respondent age influenced preferences in Japan and the USA only. CONCLUSIONS: Patients across a myriad of geographies, settings and demographics harbour specific preferences for physician attire. Some preferences are nearly universal, whereas others vary substantially. As a one-size-fits-all dress policy is unlikely to reflect patient desires and expectations, a tailored approach should be sought that attempts to match attire to clinical context.

Quality and safety in the literature: October 2022.

Healthcare quality and safety span multiple topics across the spectrum of academic and clinical disciplines. Keeping abreast of the rapidly growing body of work can be challenging. In this series, we provide succinct summaries of selected relevant studies published in the last several months. Some articles will focus on a particular theme, whereas others will highlight unique publications from high-impact medical journals.