Development of a workflow for identification of nuclear genotyping markers for Cyclospora cayetanensis.

Cyclospora cayetanensis is an intestinal parasite responsible for the diarrheal illness, cyclosporiasis. Molecular genotyping, using targeted amplicon sequencing, provides a complementary tool for outbreak investigations, especially when epidemiological data are insufficient for linking cases and identifying clusters. The goal of this study was to identify candidate genotyping markers using a novel workflow for detection of segregating single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in C. cayetanensis genomes. Four whole C. cayetanensis genomes were compared using this workflow and four candidate markers were selected for evaluation of their genotyping utility by PCR and Sanger sequencing. These four markers covered 13 SNPs and resolved parasites from 57 stool specimens, differentiating C. cayetanensis into 19 new unique genotypes.

TITLE: Développement d'un flux de travail pour l'identification de marqueurs de génotypage nucléaire pour Cyclospora cayetanensis. ABSTRACT: Cyclospora cayetanensis est un parasite intestinal responsable de la cyclosporose, maladie diarrhéique. Le génotypage moléculaire, utilisant le séquençage ciblé des amplicons, fournit un outil complémentaire pour les enquêtes sur les épidémies, en particulier lorsque les données épidémiologiques sont insuffisantes pour relier les cas et identifier les grappes. Le but de cette étude était d'identifier des marqueurs candidats de génotypage à l'aide d'un nouveau flux de travail pour la détection des polymorphismes d'un seul nucléotide (SNP) différentiateurs dans les génomes de C. cayetanensis. Quatre génomes entiers de C. cayetanensis ont été comparés à l'aide de ce flux de travail et quatre marqueurs candidats ont été sélectionnés pour l'évaluation de leur utilité de génotypage par PCR et séquençage Sanger. Ces quatre marqueurs couvraient 13 SNP et ont résolu les parasites provenant de 57 spécimens de selles, différenciant C. cayetanensis en 19 nouveaux génotypes uniques.

Quantifying stream periphyton assemblage responses to nutrient amendments with a molecular approach.

Nutrient (nitrogen [N] and phosphorus [P]) pollution is a pervasive water quality issue in the USA for small streams and rivers. The effect of nutrients on the biotic condition of streams is often evaluated with biological indicators such as macroinvertebrate assemblages or periphyton assemblages, particularly diatoms. Molecular approaches facilitate the use of periphyton assemblages as bioindicators because periphyton is diverse and its composition as a whole, rather than just diatoms, soft-bodied algae, or any single group, may convey additional information about responses to nutrients. To further develop the concept that a taxonomically-broad evaluation of periphyton assemblages could be useful for developing stream bioindicators, we examined microbial assemblage composition with both 16S and 18S rRNA genes, enabling us to evaluate composition in 3 domains. We measured otherwise unknown nutrient responses of different periphyton groups in situ with experiments that used glass fiber filters to allow diffusion of amended nutrients into a stream. We deployed these experimental setups in 2 streams that differ in the extent of agricultural land-use in their catchments in the southeastern USA. Experiments consisted of controls, N amendments, P amendments, and both N and P amendments. Periphyton assemblages that grew on the filters differed significantly by stream, date or season, and nutrient treatment. Assemblage differences across treatments were more consistent among Bacteria and Archaea than among eukaryotes. Effects of nutrient amendments were more pronounced in the stream with less agricultural land use and, therefore, lower nutrient loading than in the stream with more agricultural land use and higher nutrient loading. Combined N and P amendments decreased species richness and evenness for Bacteria and Archaea by ∼36 and ∼9%, respectively, compared with controls. Indicator species analysis revealed that specific clades varied in their response to treatments. Indicators based on the responses of these indicator clades were related to nutrient treatments across sites and seasons. Analyses that included all the taxa in a domain did not resolve differences in responses to N vs P. Instead, better resolution was achieved with an analysis focused on diatoms, which responded more strongly to P than N. Overall, our results showed that in situ nutrient-diffusing substrate experiments are a useful approach for describing assemblage responses to nutrients in streams. This type of molecular approach may be useful to environmental agencies and stakeholders responsible for assessing and managing stream water quality and biotic condition.