Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Healthc Policy ; 15(2): 100-114, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32077848

ABSTRACT

Recognition of the value of the patient perspective on services has led healthcare organizations to measure patient care experiences. A brief, generic and psychometrically sound scale to measure patient experiences in ambulatory/outpatient settings in Canada would be useful and is currently lacking. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an English-language hospital-based ambulatory patient experience survey tool in a Canadian context. Based on a review of more than 20 instruments measuring experiences predominately in non-acute care settings, we initially selected 27 items to be included in the questionnaire, addressing quality dimensions of access, communication, continuity and coordination, shared decision making, emotional support, trust/confidence, privacy, patient-reported impact and physical environment. The survey instrument was subsequently tested among 1,219 ambulatory patients, and its psychometric properties were assessed. A final questionnaire was produced with 14 items and two emerging subscales: Patient-Provider Communication and Overall Quality of Experience, as determined by a factor analysis. The items within the scale showed high construct validity. Reliability was also excellent for the instrument. The applicability of this tool in supporting quality improvement initiatives is discussed.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics/standards , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Contraception ; 83(3): 268-73, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21310290

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The benefits of social support in post-surgical recovery are well documented; social support decreases preoperative stress and postoperative recovery time. However, a paucity of studies have examined the effect of social support in the context of pregnancy termination. This study is the first to examine the effect of postoperative accompaniment from the patient, support person and nurses' perspective. STUDY DESIGN: This study was carried out in two phases. In Phase I, no accompaniment was allowed in the post-anesthesia recovery room (PAR); in Phase II, accompaniment was permitted. All participants completed pre- and postoperative questionnaires. RESULTS: The perception of accompaniment was overwhelmingly positive in patients and support people. Patients in Phase II demonstrated a high (over 95%) acceptance of accompaniment in the recovery room. It was found that 96.8% reported they would choose to be accompanied in the recovery room again if they had to have another abortion. Support persons felt very strongly that their presence was helpful to the patient. The decrease in pre- to postoperative anxiety levels was significantly greater in those women who were accompanied. However, overall, nurses demonstrated a negative attitude towards accompaniment in the recovery room. CONCLUSION: In summary, the presence of a support person in the PAR was perceived in a positive manner by patients and support people. However, the reasoning behind the negative opinion of nurses requires further study before PAR accompaniment can be considered a possibility in the context of pregnancy termination.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/methods , Abortion, Induced/psychology , Social Support , Adolescent , Adult , British Columbia , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses , Pregnancy , Recovery Room , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
3.
Hum Reprod ; 25(9): 2203-9, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20634190

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic secondary recurrent miscarriage may be associated with an abnormal maternal immune response to subsequent pregnancies. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been studied in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with conflicting results. Therefore, a definitive trial was proposed. METHODS: We conducted an investigator-initiated, multicentered, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing IVIG with saline in women with idiopathic secondary recurrent miscarriage, defined as a history of at least one prior ongoing pregnancy followed by three or more consecutive unexplained miscarriages. Subjects received either IVIG 500 mg/kg or the equivalent volume of normal saline. Preconception infusions were administered 14-21 days from the projected next menstrual period. With documentation of pregnancy, the subject received the same infusion every 4 weeks until 18-20 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was an ongoing pregnancy of at least 20 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients enrolled, of whom 47 had an index pregnancy. All ongoing pregnancies resulted in live births. Therefore, the live birth rates were 70% (16/23) in the IVIG group and 63% (15/24) in the control group (P = 0.760); odds ratio (OR) 1.37 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-4.61]. Including only clinical pregnancies (embryo with cardiac activity at 6 weeks of gestation), the live birth rates were equivalent, 94% (16/17) and (15/16), respectively (P > 0.999); OR 1.07 (95% CI 0.06-18.62). Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating IVIG for idiopathic secondary recurrent miscarriage revealed live birth rates of 70% (31/44) in the IVIG group and 62% (28/45) in the control group (P = 0.503); common OR 1.44 (95% CI 0.59-3.48). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest RCT to date in which IVIG was evaluated in women with idiopathic secondary recurrent miscarriage; no treatment benefit was found. The meta-analysis, which combined our study results with two prior RCTs, also showed no significant effect of treatment with IVIG.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Habitual/prevention & control , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Abortion, Habitual/immunology , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Early Termination of Clinical Trials , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Rate
4.
Am J Perinatol ; 23(2): 125-9, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16506120

ABSTRACT

Obstetrical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is associated with maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Standard treatment with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid and unfractionated heparin has achieved up to a 70 to 80% likelihood of success. Conversely, up to 30% of women with APS will have further pregnancy losses, despite treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may be a promising adjuvant when standard treatment fails. We present a case of a 35-year-old woman with obstetrical APS and maternal floor infarction in prior pregnancy losses who continued to have further unsuccessful pregnancies despite standard treatment with acetylsalicylic acid and unfractionated heparin. On an investigational basis, she was prescribed concomitant IVIG and had two subsequent healthy newborns. IVIG appears to be promising in obstetrical patients with APS who are refractory to standard treatment. Prior history of maternal floor infarction may be a prognostic indicator for triple therapy for obstetrical APS.


Subject(s)
Antiphospholipid Syndrome/drug therapy , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Infarction/diagnosis , Pelvic Floor/blood supply , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Pregnancy Outcome , Adult , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/diagnosis , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gestational Age , Humans , Infarction/drug therapy , Maternal Age , Parity , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Prenatal Care/methods , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 26(8): 729-34, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15307977

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), specifically dalteparin, to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) in pregnancy. METHODS: In a tertiary referral centre, 28 women met the 1999 International Consensus Criteria for APS, based on their obstetrical history and APS serology. The women were randomized, using a random numbers table with blocks of 12, to receive either prophylactic dosing of dalteparin or UFH starting either preconceptionally or early in pregnancy. All women also received low-dose acetylsalicylic acid, started preconceptionally. The primary outcome was a live birth. The secondary outcomes were maternal and fetal complications. RESULTS: Of the 14 women who received the LMWH, dalteparin, and the 14 women who received UFH, 1 woman in each group did not conceive. Nine of the 13 women (69%) given dalteparin had a successful pregnancy (95% confidence interval [CI], 39-91%), compared to 4 out of the 13 women (31%) in the UFH group (95% CI, 9-61%). Nine women in total had spinal or epidural anaesthesia, and there were no complications overall. CONCLUSION: Dalteparin may be an effective alternative to UFH for treatment of APS in pregnancy. A multicentre randomized trial is needed to determine benefit-to-risk ratios for the use of dalteparin and UFH to treat this high-risk obstetrical condition. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies are also recommended to maximize therapeutic response and minimize toxicity.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/drug therapy , Dalteparin/therapeutic use , Heparin/therapeutic use , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Adult , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Pilot Projects , Preconception Care , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...