Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetics in subjects with various degrees of renal function.

As the primary route for elimination of clinafloxacin is renal clearance (CL(R)) of unchanged drug, studies were conducted to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of clinafloxacin following administration to young and elderly subjects, subjects with various degrees of renal function, and subjects requiring dialysis. These were open-label studies in which subjects received single oral clinafloxacin doses. Sixteen young subjects (18 to 35 years old) and 16 elderly subjects (>65 years old) were enrolled in a study comparing pharmacokinetic profiles of clinafloxacin in young and elderly subjects. Twenty subjects having various degrees of renal function were enrolled into one of three groups based on degree of renal function as measured by creatinine clearance (CL(CR)). Twelve subjects with severe renal impairment requiring dialysis enrolled in a third study. Clinafloxacin was generally well tolerated by all subjects. Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetic profiles in elderly subjects were dependent only on age-related decreases in renal function. Clinafloxacin maximum concentrations in plasma, areas under the concentration-time curves, and terminal elimination half-life values increased with decreasing CL(CR) values. Total apparent body clearance of clinafloxacin from the plasma after oral administration (CL(oral)) and CL(R) were dependent on CL(CR) according to the following relationships: CL(oral) = 2.3. CL(CR) + 77 and CL(R) = 1.74. CL(CR). Hemodialysis had no significant effect on clinafloxacin clearance. Based on the relationship between CL(CR) and clinafloxacin CL(oral) and CL(R) values, the clinafloxacin dose should be halved in patients having a CL(CR) of <40 ml/min. Further dose adjustment is not warranted in patients requiring hemodialysis.

Drug interactions with clinafloxacin.

Many fluoroquinolone antibiotics are inhibitors of cytochrome P450 enzyme systems and may produce potentially important drug interactions when administered with other drugs. Studies were conducted to determine the effect of clinafloxacin on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline, caffeine, warfarin, and phenytoin, as well as the effect of phenytoin on the pharmacokinetics of clinafloxacin. Concomitant administration of 200 or 400 mg of clinafloxacin reduces mean theophylline clearance by approximately 50 and 70%, respectively, and reduces mean caffeine clearance by 84%. (R)-Warfarin concentrations in plasma during clinafloxacin administration are 32% higher and (S)-warfarin concentrations do not change during clinafloxacin treatment. An observed late pharmacodynamic effect was most likely due to gut flora changes. Phenytoin has no effect on clinafloxacin pharmacokinetics, while phenytoin clearance is 15% lower during clinafloxacin administration.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of atorvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor.

The objective of this study is to determine the relationships between plasma atorvastatin concentrations, LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol reduction, and atorvastatin dose; the earliest time at which lipid levels change when atorvastatin treatment is initiated or discontinued; and alterations in LDL particle composition. Twenty-four subjects with elevated LDL-cholesterol were treated with escalating daily doses of 5, 20, and 80 mg atorvastatin for 6 weeks each. Serial plasma lipid and lipoprotein analyses were performed during the initiation and discontinuation of atorvastatin therapy, as well as at steady state. LDL-apolipoprotein B and LDL-cholesterol were measured directly after ultracentrifugation, and LDL-cholesterol also was estimated by the method of Friedewald. Steady-state atorvastatin pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated on the last day of each dosing period. LDL-cholesterol (Friedewald) reductions of 34%, 43%, and 57% were produced by atorvastatin doses of 5, 20, and 80 mg, respectively. The mean dose-response relationship was log linear, and almost all individual dose-response curves paralleled the mean curve. LDL-apolipoprotein B reductions were slightly less than those of LDL-cholesterol. Atorvastatin area under the curve (AUC(0-24) values increased proportionally with dose, while values of Cmax (maximum concentration) increased more than proportionally, and Cmin (minimum concentration) increased less than proportionally. Following initiation of dosing, statistically significant decreases in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol (beta quant), and LDL-apolipoprotein B were observed within 24 hours and in LDL-C (Friedewald) within 72 hours. Following discontinuation of drug dosing, statistically significant increases were observed in total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol (Friedewald) within 48 hours and in LDL-cholesterol (beta quant) and LDL-apolipoprotein B within 72 hours. At each dose, an individual's LDL-cholesterol response was not correlated with AUC(0-24). In conclusion, atorvastatin produces marked LDL-cholesterol reductions, the mean dose-response relationship is log linear, almost all individual dose-response curves parallel the mean dose-response curve, onset and cessation of action are rapid, the estimated and measured LDL-cholesterol are the same, LDL-cholesterol and LDL-Apo B reductions are similar, and plasma concentrations are not correlated with LDL-cholesterol reduction at a given dose.

Effects of atorvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, on hepatic oxidative metabolism of antipyrine.

Possible effects of multiple-dose administration of atorvastatin on the pharmacokinetics of single-dose antipyrine were evaluated in this drug-drug interaction study. Twelve healthy male volunteers received three 200-mg capsules of antipyrine on days 1 and 22, and two 40-mg atorvastatin tablets in the morning on days 8 through 23. Serial blood and urine samples were collected after administration of each antipyrine dose. Plasma was analyzed for antipyrine, and urine samples were analyzed for antipyrine, 4-hydroxyantipyrine, and norantipyrine by validated high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Overall, antipyrine and atorvastatin doses were well tolerated in healthy volunteers. Mean antipyrine concentrations in plasma after administration of a single, oral dose of antipyrine during coadministration of multiple doses of atorvastatin were nearly superimposible on concentrations after administration of antipyrine alone. Individual and mean parameter values for plasma pharmacokinetics of antipyrine were similar in both treatment periods. Atorvastatin did not significantly alter the fraction of clearance of antipyrine in plasma that occurred by urinary excretion of 4-hydroxyantipyrine and norantipyrine. These results indicate that the recommended highest daily dose of atorvastatin has negligible effects on antipyrine pharmacokinetics and on oxidative pathways responsible for the metabolism of antipyrine.

Effect of age and gender on pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin in humans.

Atorvastatin is a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor that reduces plasma cholesterol by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis and increasing cellular uptake of low density lipoproteins. The effects of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin after administration of single 20-mg tablets of atorvastatin were studied in 16 young and 16 elderly volunteers (8 men and 8 women in each age group). Plasma equivalent concentrations of atorvastatin were quantitated by a validated enzyme inhibition bioassay. Atorvastatin was well tolerated by the participants. The equivalent maximum concentration (Cmax) of atorvastatin was 42.5% higher in elderly participants (age, 66-92 years) than in young participants (age, 19-35 years) and 17.6% higher in women than in men. In addition, mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) and half-life (t1/2) were 27.3% greater and 36.2% longer, respectively, in elderly adults than in young adults and 11.3% lower and 19.9% shorter, respectively, in women than in men. Because the primary site of action for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is the liver and atorvastatin is subject to extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism, it is unclear whether these age- and gender-related differences in the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin will be clinically important. Results of subsequent safety and efficacy trials should help clarify the clinical significance of these pharmacokinetic differences.