Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Transfusion ; 55(9): 2104-12, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26013691

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To increase blood safety, various procedures are currently implemented, including donor selection, optimized donor arm disinfection, and diversion. In addition, pathogen inactivation (PI) techniques can be used for platelets (PLTs) and plasma concentrates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study investigated the clinical efficacy of an inactivation technique for different blood components at two time points (12 and 35.5 hr). Eight transfusion-relevant bacterial strains were spiked at two different concentrations (100 and 1000 colony-forming units [CFUs]/bag) into whole blood (WB), apheresis PLTs (APs), and buffy coat (BC)-derived minipool PLTs. RESULTS: The bacterial concentrations were higher than 10(6) CFUs/mL within 24 hours after spiking depending on the particular bacterial strain. PI was absolute for all of the APs performed 12 hours after inoculation, but the bacterial strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Bacillus cereus were not completely inactivated in WB or BC PLTs, performed 35.5 and 12 hours after inoculation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The INTERCEPT PI system was not 100% effective for high concentrations of certain K. pneumoniae strains or spore-forming B. cereus. A critical observation was that the period between blood donation and inactivation needs to be minimal to enable efficient PI. In the case where PI cannot be performed immediately after preparation, a combination of a PI technology after the production of blood components with a rapid bacterial screen test on Day 4 or 5 after donation may offer a solution to further prevent the risk of bacterial transmission by transfusion.


Subject(s)
Bacillus cereus , Blood Safety/methods , Disinfection/methods , Donor Selection/methods , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Microbial Viability , Blood Platelets/microbiology , Humans , Plasma/microbiology
2.
Transfusion ; 49(12): 2604-11, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19682343

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: According to German regulations and guidelines, residual red blood cells (rRBCs) and residual white blood cells (rWBCs) must number fewer than 3 x 10(9) cells/unit and 1 x 10(6) cells/unit in platelet concentrates (PCs), respectively. Due to low levels of residual cells in final products, there is still a need for fast, reliable, and sensitive methods of automated detection of these cell types. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In Part A, 21 PCs were spiked with predetermined numbers of red blood cells (RBCs) and white blood cells (WBCs). The linearity, precision, and accuracy of the BD Thrombo Count assay (BD Biosciences Europe) were tested and validated according to international guidelines. Finally in Part B, 100 PCs prepared from pooled buffy coats were tested by the BD Thrombo Count assay and compared with other methods, including Nageotte (rWBCs) and Neubauer (rRBCs) counting chambers and the flow cytometric BD LeucoCOUNT (Becton Dickinson) assay (rWBCs). RESULTS: The unspecific background of blank PC samples was fewer than 0.02 cells/microL for WBCs and fewer than 34 cells/microL for RBCs (mean, 21). Linear regression and precision analyses of spiked PC samples were determined for both WBCs (r(2) = 0.992; range, 0.6-6.0 WBCs/microL) and RBCs (r(2) = 0.999; 800-8000 RBCs/microL). No carryover of cells or drift in results was detected in the automated sample acquisition mode. Analysis according to statistical methods of Bland and Altman demonstrated a high correlation between BD Thrombo Count and the Neubauer manual counting chamber. CONCLUSION: This novel flow cytometric test is a quick and reliable single-tube assay that has been demonstrated as a potential alternative for the existing manual microscopic counting procedures that are both time-consuming and laborious.


Subject(s)
Erythrocyte Count/methods , Flow Cytometry/methods , Leukocyte Count/methods , Platelet Count , Plateletpheresis/standards , Erythrocyte Count/standards , Erythrocytes/cytology , Flow Cytometry/standards , Humans , Leukocyte Count/standards , Leukocytes/cytology , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Transfusion ; 48(8): 1558-66, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18466173

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk of transfusion-transmitted human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections is predominantly attributable to donations given during the early stage of infection when diagnostic tests may fail. In 1997, nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT)-testing was introduced at the German Red Cross (GRC) blood donor services to reduce this diagnostic window period (WP). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 31,524,571 blood donations collected from 1997 through 2005 were screened by minipool NAT, predominantly with pool sizes of 96 donations. These donations cover approximately 80 percent of all the blood collected in Germany during that period. Based on these data, the WP risk in the GRC blood donor population was estimated by using a state-of-the-art mathematic model. RESULTS: During the observation period, 23 HCV, 7 HIV-1, and 43 HBV NAT-only-positive donations were detected. On the basis of these data and estimated pre-NAT infectious WPs, the residual risk per unit transfused was estimated at 1 in 10.88 million for HCV (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.51-19.72 million), 1 in 4.30 million for HIV-1 (95% CI, 2.39-21.37 million), and 1 in 360,000 for HBV (95% CI, 0.19-3.36 million). Based on observed cases of breakthrough infections, the risk of transfusion-related infections may be even lower. CONCLUSION: The risk of a blood recipient becoming infected with HCV, HIV-1, or HBV has reached an extremely low level. Introduction of individual donation testing for HCV and HIV-1 would have a marginal effect on interception of WP donations.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Red Cross , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , DNA, Viral/blood , Germany/epidemiology , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV-1 , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/transmission , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/transmission , Humans , Incidence , Models, Statistical , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Virus Diseases/transmission
4.
Transfusion ; 46(8): 1367-73, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16934073

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bacterial screening of all produced platelet concentrates (PCs) is implemented in many countries to reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted sepsis. This study compares three rapid bacterial detection methods by imitating real-life conditions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of a solid-phase scanning cytometer (optimized Scansystem, Hemosystem), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis, and 16S RNA in-house nucleic acid testing (NAT) was evaluated by spiking PCs with four transfusion relevant bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli ). Two different inocula (10 colony-forming units [CFUs]/mL and 10 CFUs/bag) were used to simulate real-life conditions. Samples were taken at 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours after spiking. RESULTS: With the high inoculum, NAT had a 100 percent rate of positive testing for all four types of bacteria (10/10 replicates) at each time point. With the exception of E. coli, the sensitivity of FACS and optimized Scansystem was comparable for the high inoculum. With the low inoculum, 60 percent of E. coli, 80 percent of B. cereus, 90 percent of K. pneumoniae, and 100 percent of S. aureus were NAT-positive 12 hours after spiking. In contrast, only 20 percent of E. coli, 10 percent of B. cereus, and 70 percent of K. pneumoniae were FACS-positive with the low inoculum 12 hours after spiking. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the preliminary data revealed a higher sensitivity for NAT in comparison to FACS and optimized Scansystem under the defined study conditions. To imitate real-life conditions, further spiking studies with a low inoculum (10 CFUs/bag) and slower growing organisms should be conducted to examine the sensitivity of available detection systems.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Blood Platelets , Flow Cytometry , Platelet Transfusion , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/blood , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sepsis/prevention & control , Bacterial Infections/blood , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Blood Platelets/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Flow Cytometry/instrumentation , Flow Cytometry/methods , Humans , Platelet Transfusion/adverse effects , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sepsis/blood , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/etiology , Sepsis/transmission
5.
Vox Sang ; 89(3): 135-9, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16146505

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prevention and detection of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates remains a major challenge for transfusion medicine. To be suitable for blood-transfusion services, the contamination detection method must be highly sensitive, easy to perform and preferably of low cost. In this spiking study, we evaluated the new optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit detection method for use on apheresis platelets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Apheresis platelet concentrates (APCs) were individually spiked with 10 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml of one of 10 different strains of bacteria. The spiked APCs were analysed at specific time-points during incubation by using the optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit. Bacterial enumeration was performed by plating onto blood agar. RESULTS: All the bacterial strains tested were detected by using the optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit when sampled 24 h after spiking. Compared to the Scansystem standard kit, sensitivity was increased to < 50 CFU/ml. The identity of the spiked bacteria was confirmed by Gram staining and DNA fingerprinting. CONCLUSION: The optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit was able to reliably detect, within 70 min, 10 transfusion-relevant bacterial species in APCs when a sample volume was taken 24 h after spiking. This is the first study carried out by using the optimized Scansystem bacterial detection that was found to have an enhanced sensitivity compared to the standard kit.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Blood Platelets/microbiology , Platelet Transfusion/standards , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Plateletpheresis/standards , Quality Control , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Clin Chem ; 51(7): 1217-22, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15976102

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extraction protocols using magnetic solid phases offer a high potential for automation. However, commercially available magnetic-bead-based assays either lack the sensitivity required for viral diagnostics or are disproportionately expensive. METHODS: We developed an aqueous chemistry for extraction of viral nucleic acids from plasma samples by use of common magnetic silica beads. Nucleic acids were bound to the beads at acidic conditions in the presence of a kosmotropic salt and were eluted at a slightly alkaline pH. The method was implemented on a standard pipetting workstation for fully automated extraction of up to 48 samples of 240 muL plasma in 1 batch. RESULTS: The detection limit of the method was comparable to the spin-column-based QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit, which relies on chaotropic salts and binding to a silica membrane, as the comparison method. The 95% detection limit was 23.1 IU per PCR for HIV-1 and 10.7 IU per PCR for hepatitis C virus (HCV). Suitability for clinical routine testing was confirmed in a total of 178 HIV-1- or HCV-positive plasma samples. The method linearity (R(2)) was >0.99 for the viruses evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Use of reagents without organic solvents allows simple and cost-effective automation of this method on common pipetting robots with low risk of contamination. Performance characteristics of the novel extraction method make it suitable for use in diagnosis of infectious diseases and viral load determinations.


Subject(s)
RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Autoanalysis , HIV-1/genetics , Hepacivirus/genetics , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Magnetics , Membranes, Artificial , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Robotics , Salts , Sensitivity and Specificity , Silicon Dioxide , Water/chemistry
7.
Transfusion ; 45(3): 399-403, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15752158

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Microbiologic agents such as variola virus (VAR) are very attractive for terrorism. As a result of international collaboration under the WHO eradication campaign, smallpox was declared eradicated in 1980. Therefore, the immunization programs were discontinued worldwide. Because most people are now immunologically naive, VAR is considered to be a potential threat agent or bioterrorist weapon. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by melting analysis was developed for fast and safe analysis and allows differentiation of VAR from other orthopoxviruses (OPVs) like vaccinia or camelpox virus. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A RealArt Orthopox LC PCR kit (Artus GmbH) was used to amplify OPV sequences from blood donor samples. A total of 31,500 blood donor samples were tested in minipools of up to 96 samples. To evaluate the sensitivity of the assay, routine donor minipools (90 +/- 6 samples per pool) were spiked with vaccinia virus used as positive control. RESULTS: Specificity was 100 percent because none of 31,500 blood donors was positive for the presence OPV. The detection limit of the assay was 10.6 copies per PCR procedure. Therefore, a sensitivity of 1590 copies per mL was calculated. Overall, 0.28 percent of test results had to be considered invalid owing to negative internal controls. CONCLUSION: The RealArt Orthopox LC PCR kit enables reliable detection of OPV DNA in viremic blood donor samples, even at the beginning of the disease when patients present minor clinical symptoms, and could be implemented in our routine screening procedure immediately. Thus, the assay could potentially help to prevent dispersion of viral agents by blood transfusion in case of bioterrorism.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism/prevention & control , Blood Banking/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Orthopoxvirus/isolation & purification , Poxviridae Infections/prevention & control , Blood Donors , Humans , Orthopoxvirus/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Poxviridae Infections/transmission , Sensitivity and Specificity
8.
J Clin Microbiol ; 42(5): 2094-100, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15131175

ABSTRACT

The new severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV), described in February 2003, infected a total of 8,439 people. A total of 812 people died due to respiratory insufficiency. Close contact with symptomatic patients appeared to be the main route of transmission. However, potential transmission by blood transfusion could not be definitely excluded. Two real-time SARS-specific PCR assays were assessed for their sensitivities, agreement of test results, and intra-assay variabilities. Both assays rely on reverse transcription and amplification of extracted RNA. Dilutions of gamma-irradiated cell culture supernatants of SARS CoV-infected Vero E6 cells were prepared to determine the precisions, linear ranges, and accuracies of the assays. The linear range for the Artus RealArt HPA-Coronavirus assay (Artus assay) was 1 x 10(2) to 1 x 10(7) copies/ml, and that for the Roche LightCycler SARS CoV Quantification kit (Roche assay) was 1 x 10(4) to 2 x 10(8) copies/ml. The detection limit of the Roche assay was 3,982.1 copies/ml, whereas that of the Artus assay was 37.8 copies/ml. Detection limits were calculated with a standard preparation that was recommended for use by the World Health Organization. However, quantification of CoV in this preparation may be imprecise. In summary, both assays are suitable for quantitative measurement of SARS CoV at the high concentrations expected in sputum samples. The Artus assay is also suitable for detection of SARS CoV at the low concentrations found in serum samples.


Subject(s)
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/genetics , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/isolation & purification , Humans , RNA, Viral/blood , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/virology , Virology/methods , Virology/statistics & numerical data
9.
Transfusion ; 44(4): 470-5, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15043560

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was first described in February 2003. Close contact with symptomatic patients appears to be the main route of transmission, whereas blood transfusion transmission could not be ruled out. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) detection kit developed by C. Drosten (Bernhard Nocht Institute, BNI) was used to amplify SARS-CoV sequences from blood donor samples. We tested 31,151 blood donor samples in minipools of up to 96 samples. To validate the sensitivity of the assay, routine donor minipools (88 +/- 8 samples per pool) were spiked with plasma of an imported case of SARS or of a subsequently infected contact person, respectively. Gamma-irradiated cell culture supernatants of Vero E6 cells, infected with SARS-CoV, were used as positive controls. RESULTS: None of 31,151 blood donors were positive for the presence of SARS. Two 96-member plasma pools that were each spiked with 100 microL of plasma of the German index patient or his wife, respectively, were positive. Overall, 0.85 percent of test results had to be considered invalid owing to negative internal controls. CONCLUSION: A real-time CoV PCR test is able to detect SARS-CoV in viremic blood donor samples even in the beginning of the disease when patients present minor clinical symptoms. Thus the assay could potentially help to prevent transfusion-associated SARS-CoV transmissions.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/standards , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , RNA, Viral/blood , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/prevention & control , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/transmission , Transfusion Reaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...