The value of dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI in mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications.

AIMS: To evaluate the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of BI-RADS-5 type of microcalcifications of the breast, to compare the size of the microcalcification lesions using mammography (MG) and MRI, and to determine the value of MRI in surgery for microcalcifications. The study also determines the morphology of microcalcification lesions, assesses kinetic curves and compare MRI features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) for different histopathological grades. METHODS: Our group consisted of 32 patients with mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications. The MRI was done in this group of women which was later followed by stereotactic vaccum-assisted biopsy (SVAB). Surgery was performed on all patients with a biopsy that resulted in a diagnosis of breast cancer or atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). RESULTS: Of our group of 32 patients, there were 35 mammograhically detected microcalcification lesions, 32 DCIS, one ADH and two benign findings according to the final histology. The microcalcification lesions were larger using MRI than in MG in 10 women. We diagnosed DCIS multifocality in 6 women and bilateral carcinoma in one woman. As with kinetic curve assessment, we found in 67 % of DCIS a rapid rise, 27 % a moderate and in 6 % a slow initial rise. With the pattern of enhancement in the delayed phase, we found in 30 % of DCIS a washout pattern, 67 % a plateau and in 3 % a persistent pattern. Noted difference between high and low grade DCIS was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: MRI sensitivity in the detection of DCIS was 94 % in our group of patients and was the sole evidence for detection of multifocality and bilateral incidence of carcinoma. In 26 % of women the outcome of MRI was the most important for converting breast conserving surgery to mastectomy.

Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia of breast: a case report.

AIM: To present a case of pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) and its findings under 1. mammography - MG, 2. ultrasonography - USG and 3. magnetic resonance imaging - MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A woman 39 years of age with a history of mass in her right breast of 3 months duration was subjected to a routine examination of the mass using MG & USG. According to the modality findings a core cut biopsy was done following which the samples were send for histological analysis. Later, MRI was done as advocated by the surgeon to get a better picture of the extent of the lesion prior to surgery. RESULTS: Bilateral mammogram views revealed in the patient's right breast a huge well-bordered tumour of lobulated contour without halo sign. Sonography revealed a big well-demarcated tumour in the central part of the right breast which was cystic and lobulated in shape. Histological analysis of the sample confirmed pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH). MRI under a breast array coil revealed a mass of 85 x 75 x 35mm in the right breast. Finally, based on the clinical, radiological and histological report the mass was diagnosed as benign and despite the massive size of the mass, tumour excision alone was done and not mastectomy. The right breast after the huge tumour excision was almost normal in size compared to the left. CONCLUSION: PASH should be included in the differential diagnosis of a circumscribed or partially circumscribed mass, especially in the pre-menopausal female population. These benign masses often grow over time and can recur locally. Radiological diagnosis of PASH is usually done by MG and USG followed by core cut biopsy for histological analysis. However great the mass is, excision only of the tumor mass is recommended and not mastectomy.

Breast imaging using 3D electrical impedence tomography.

AIM: To determine the diagnostic efficiency of 3D Eletrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) compared to Mammography (MG) and Ultrasonography (USG) in imaging the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of 88 patients presenting with various breast complaints was examined using combined Mammography and Ultrasonography (MG & USG) or either of these modalities alone. The same patients were then examined using the 3D EIT imaging system "MEIK". The findings were then compared. The sensitivity of these modalities for this group of patients were later determined and statistically analysed. RESULTS: Of the total of 88 patients, 59 findings were "suspicious" by any of the 3 modalities alone or by their combination. EIT had a sensitivity of 77.8 % compared to MG with a sensitivity of 83.3 % and USG with a sensitivity of 94.4 % regarding cases of fibrocystic mastitis. For cases involving cysts, EIT had 100 % sensitivity which was the same as that for USG compared to MG with a sensitivity of only 81 %. Among cases of fibroadenoma, EIT had a sensitivity of just 68.8 % compared to MG with a sensitivity of 87.5 % and USG with a sensitivity of 75 %. Finally among cases of carcinoma, EIT had a sensitivity of 75 % compared to the sensitivity of 100 % of MG and USG in our group of patients. The study revealed that there was no overall significant difference in sensitivity between MG-USG (p = 0.219) and MG-EIT (p = 0.779) and USG-EIT (p = 0.169). However, in regard to identifying cysts there was significant difference in the sensitivity of MG compared to USG & EIT suggesting that EIT has a role in these cases. CONCLUSION: Electrical impedance could be used as an adjunct to Mammography and Ultrasonography for breast cancer detection. However, the differentiation of malignant from benign lesions based on impedance measurements needs further investigation. Multifrequency electrical impedance imaging appears the most promising for detecting breast malignancies but methodological improvements need to be made to realise its potential.

Spontaneous splenic rupture in two patients with hematologic malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous splenic rupture (SSR) is a very rare complication described in several hundred patients, mainly as case reports. It is defined as a splenic rupture without antecedent injury. The authors of the present paper describe the only two SSR cases diagnosed at the Hemato-oncology department, coincidentally in one year. PATIENTS: The first patient was admitted to hospital because of planned chemotherapy for relapsed hairy cell leukemia. The second was directed to the Hemato-oncology outpatient department because of anemia and painful splenomegaly diagnosed by a physician. The diagnose of hematologic malignancy (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma) was determined subsequently on the basis of histological examination of the spleen. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to consider SSR not only in patients with known diagnosis of malignant disease but in the patients with negative anamnesis, too. The aim of the paper is to draw attention to the existence of this complication.

The role of various modalities in breast imaging.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Mammography is considered the "gold standard" in the evaluation of the breast from an imaging perspective. Apart from mammography, ultrasound examination and magnetic resonance imaging are being offered as adjuncts to the preoperative workup. Recently, other new modalities like positron emission tomography, 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) are also being offered. However, there is still controversy over the most appropriate use of these new modalities. Based on the literature, this review evaluates the role of various modalities used in the screening and diagnosis of breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on relevant literatures this article gives an overview of the old and new modalities used in the field of breast imaging. A narrative literature review of all the relevant papers known to the authors was conducted. The search of literatures was done using pubmed and ovid search engines. Additional references were found through bibliography reviews of relevant articles. It was clear that though various new technics and methods have emerged, none have substituted mammography and it is still the only proven screening method for the breast as of date. CONCLUSION: From the literature it is clear that apropos modern radiology's impact on diagnosis, staging and patient follow-up, only one imaging technique has had a significant impact on screening asymptomatic individuals for cancer i.e.; low-dose mammography. Mammography is the only screening test proven in breast imaging. Positron emission tomography (PET) also plays an important role in staging breast cancer and monitoring treatment response. As imaging techniques improve, the role of imaging will continue to evolve with the goal remaining a decrease in breast cancer morbidity and mortality. Progress in the development and commercialisation of EIT breast imaging system will definitely help to promote other systems and applications based on the EIT and similar visualization methods. Breast ultrasound and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are frequently used adjuncts to mammography in today's clinical practice and these techniques enhance the radiologist's ability to detect cancer and assess disease extent, which is crucial in treatment planning and staging.

A comparison of mammography and ultrasonography in the evaluation of breast masses.

AIM: Aim of the study is to evaluate breast masses using mammography (MG) and ultrasonography (USG) independently and in combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study group consisted of 62 female patients, with breast symptoms such as palpable lumps, pain in the breast and nipple discharge who were examined prospectively over a period of 6 months. All 62 patients were examined by both MG and USG independently. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or core cut biopsy was done according to the findings of MG and USG and then the results were correlated with each modality finding. RESULTS: According to this study MG showed an efficiency of 81.8 % compared to 95.5 % for USG in detecting fibrocystic mastitis. However their combined approach resulted in 100 %. In the case of fibroadenomas, MG showed 75 % efficiency and USG only 35 % and the combination resulting in 93.7 %. For carcinomas, MG had an efficiency of 77.8 % and USG 55.6 %, but the combination had an efficiency of 98.1 %. Overall, the histopathological results when correlated with each modality finding showed that MG had an efficiency of only 77.4 % and USG only 69.8 % when used alone in detecting these lesions of the breast compared to an efficiency of 98.1 % obtained by their combined approach. In our study, we showed that there was no significant difference in sensitivity between MG and USG (p = 0.3768) but there was significant difference in MG alone and MG-USG combination (p = 0.0015) and USG alone and USG-MG combination (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that combined MG and USG had higher sensitivity rate than the sensitivity rate observed for either single modality. The diagnostic accuracy for carcinomas of the breast appear to improve when MG was combined with USG, even in cases which showed no evidence of microcalcification or other signs of abnormalities. Our study implies that, USG may be the only viable modality in pregnant and lactating women as it does not involve ionizing radiation and also in dense breast tissue, as density is a limiting factor for MG.

Changes in mammographic and ultrasound image of the breast of women undergoing estrogen replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of changes in mammographic and ultrasound image of the breast in female patients undergoing estrogen hormonal replacement therapy (ERT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 126 women with surgical menopause in case of benign disease using ERT and a control group of 100 women in menopause with no hormonal replacement therapy were selected for the study. Changes in the mammographic image were monitored in relation to individual types of breast according to Tabár's typology and with regard to the type of ERT application. In 38 women, changes in ultrasound image were also monitored together with ERT. RESULTS: In 17 women (13 %) undergoing ERT, an increase in mammographic image density was found. This data was statistically significant in comparison with the control group without ERT (chi2 = 21.566, p < 0.0001). In 103 (82 %) women there was no change in mammographic density and in 6 women (5 %) decreased density despite using of ERT was found. In the group of patients undergoing ERT in peroral form, we found a greater percentage of women with an increased mammographic density (17 %) in comparison with the group of women with intradermally applied ERT (9 %). Increased density of mammographic image was more frequent in women with a prevalence of adipose tissue in their breasts (type II according to Tabár). In 8 patients (21 %) of 38 women with ultrasound examination an enlargement or development of new benign formations in the breast was found; this data was statistically insignificant in comparison with the control group. CONCLUSION: In women with surgical menopause undergoing ERT, a statistically significant increase in the density of mammographic image was found (chi2 = 21.566, p < 0.0001). Increase in density of mammographic image was most frequent in women with a predominance of adipose tissue in breasts (a type II according to Tabár) and in women undergoing ERT in the peroral form. These data were statistically insignificant in 21 % of women with supplementary ultrasound examination enlargement and development of new benign lesions in the breasts were found.