Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 51(10): 3263-9, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23884998

ABSTRACT

Cultivation-based assays combined with PCR or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based methods for finding virulence factors are standard methods for detecting bacterial pathogens in stools; however, with emerging molecular technologies, new methods have become available. The aim of this study was to compare four distinct detection technologies for the identification of pathogens in stools from children under 5 years of age in The Gambia, Mali, Kenya, and Bangladesh. The children were identified, using currently accepted clinical protocols, as either controls or cases with moderate to severe diarrhea. A total of 3,610 stool samples were tested by established clinical culture techniques: 3,179 DNA samples by the Universal Biosensor assay (Ibis Biosciences, Inc.), 1,466 DNA samples by the GoldenGate assay (Illumina), and 1,006 DNA samples by sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. Each method detected different proportions of samples testing positive for each of seven enteric pathogens, enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), Shigella spp., Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella enterica, and Aeromonas spp. The comparisons among detection methods included the frequency of positive stool samples and kappa values for making pairwise comparisons. Overall, the standard culture methods detected Shigella spp., EPEC, ETEC, and EAEC in smaller proportions of the samples than either of the methods based on detection of the virulence genes from DNA in whole stools. The GoldenGate method revealed the greatest agreement with the other methods. The agreement among methods was higher in cases than in controls. The new molecular technologies have a high potential for highly sensitive identification of bacterial diarrheal pathogens.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Biosensing Techniques/methods , Diarrhea/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Africa , Bacteria/classification , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bangladesh , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 10(8): 737-43, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23767822

ABSTRACT

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-mass spectroscopy assay was developed to identify non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) with Plex-ID biosensor system, a platform identifying short PCR amplicons by specific base compositions. This assay simultaneously amplifies five fragments of two housekeeping genes, two subunits of stx2 gene, and four other virulence genes of STEC. A total of 164 well-characterized STEC isolates were examined with the assay to build a DNA base composition database. Another panel of 108 diverse STEC isolates was tested with the established database to evaluate the assay's identification capability. Among the 108 isolates, the assay specificity was 100% for three (stx1, eae, and aggA) out of five tested virulence genes, but 99% for stx2 and 96% for hlyA, respectively. Main stx1/stx2 subtypes and multiple alleles of stx1/stx2 could be differentiated. The assay successfully identified several clinically significant serotypes, including O91:H14, O103:H25, O145:H28/NM, O113:H21, and O104:H4. Meanwhile, it was able to group isolates with different levels of pathogenic potential. The results suggest that this high-throughput method may be useful in clinical and regulatory laboratories for STEC identification, particularly strains with increased pathogenic potential.


Subject(s)
Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/classification , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/methods , Adhesins, Bacterial/genetics , Animals , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Escherichia coli O157 , Escherichia coli Proteins/genetics , Fimbriae Proteins/genetics , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Microbiology , Humans , Serotyping , Shiga Toxin 1/genetics , Shiga Toxin 2/genetics , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/genetics , Virulence Factors/genetics
3.
PLoS One ; 7(6): e36528, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22768032

ABSTRACT

Technology for comprehensive identification of biothreats in environmental and clinical specimens is needed to protect citizens in the case of a biological attack. This is a challenge because there are dozens of bacterial and viral species that might be used in a biological attack and many have closely related near-neighbor organisms that are harmless. The biothreat agent, along with its near neighbors, can be thought of as a biothreat cluster or a biocluster for short. The ability to comprehensively detect the important biothreat clusters with resolution sufficient to distinguish the near neighbors with an extremely low false positive rate is required. A technological solution to this problem can be achieved by coupling biothreat group-specific PCR with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS). The biothreat assay described here detects ten bacterial and four viral biothreat clusters on the NIAID priority pathogen and HHS/USDA select agent lists. Detection of each of the biothreat clusters was validated by analysis of a broad collection of biothreat organisms and near neighbors prepared by spiking biothreat nucleic acids into nucleic acids extracted from filtered environmental air. Analytical experiments were carried out to determine breadth of coverage, limits of detection, linearity, sensitivity, and specificity. Further, the assay breadth was demonstrated by testing a diverse collection of organisms from each biothreat cluster. The biothreat assay as configured was able to detect all the target organism clusters and did not misidentify any of the near-neighbor organisms as threats. Coupling biothreat cluster-specific PCR to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry simultaneously provides the breadth of coverage, discrimination of near neighbors, and an extremely low false positive rate due to the requirement that an amplicon with a precise base composition of a biothreat agent be detected by mass spectrometry.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/genetics , Biological Warfare Agents , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/methods , Viruses/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Biological Assay , Cluster Analysis , DNA Primers/metabolism , False Negative Reactions , Limit of Detection , Research Report , Sensitivity and Specificity , Statistics as Topic , Viruses/isolation & purification
4.
PLoS One ; 7(6): e39928, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22768173

ABSTRACT

In this manuscript, we describe the identification of highly pathogenic bacteria using an assay coupling biothreat group-specific PCR with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) run on an Ibis PLEX-ID high-throughput platform. The biothreat cluster assay identifies most of the potential bioterrorism-relevant microorganisms including Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis, Yersinia pestis, Burkholderia mallei and pseudomallei, Brucella species, and Coxiella burnetii. DNA from 45 different reference materials with different formulations and different concentrations were chosen and sent to a service screening laboratory that uses the PCR/ESI-MS platform to provide a microbial identification service. The standard reference materials were produced out of a repository built up in the framework of the EU funded project "Establishment of Quality Assurances for Detection of Highly Pathogenic Bacteria of Potential Bioterrorism Risk" (EQADeBa). All samples were correctly identified at least to the genus level.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/methods , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Genome, Bacterial/genetics , Microbial Viability/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...