ABSTRACT
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumour and confers a very poor prognosis. Maximal safe resection of tumour is the goal of neurosurgical intervention and may be more easily achieved through the use of surgical adjuncts such as fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS). 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) accumulates in GBM tissue and fluoresce red, distinguishing tumour cells from the surrounding tissue and therefore making resection easier. 5-ALA-guided resection in GBM has been shown to increase resection rates and prolong progression-free survival without impacting post-operative morbidity. Radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy also improve survival in GBM. Other factors such as patient age and molecular status of the tumour also impact prognosis. Aims The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of 5-ALA vs white light-guided resection for glioblastoma in the west of Scotland. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of baseline characteristics (age, sex, tumour molecular markers, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, anatomical location of tumour and treatment group) and outcomes (mortality, survival, degree of resection and performance status) of 239 patients who underwent primary resection of glioblastoma over a four-year period (2017-2020). A variety of statistical methods were used to analyse the relationship between each variable and surgical technique; multivariate Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method were used in survival analysis. Results 5-ALA-guided resection substantially improved resection rates (74.0% vs 40.2%). Mortality at 15 months was 5.1% lower in the 5-ALA group (52.0% vs 57.1%, p = 0.53), and patients lived an average of 68 days longer compared to the white light group (444 days vs 376 days, p = 0.21). There were negligible differences between treatment groups in terms of post-operative performance status (PS) and post-operative complications. In our multivariate Cox regression model, six factors were statistically significant at a level of p ≤ 0.05: age, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation, anatomical location and >90% resection. Receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy, MGMT methylation and undergoing >90% resection conferred a survival benefit at 15 months. Older age and multi-focal disease were related to a worsened mortality rate. Undergoing radiotherapy and maximal resection were the two greatest predictors of improved survival, reducing mortality risk by 58% and 51%, respectively. Conclusion 5-ALA-guided resection improved resection rates without impacting post-operative morbidity. 5-ALA-guided resection was associated with improved survival and lower mortality rate, but this was not statistically significant. Receiving chemoradiotherapy, MGMT methylation and undergoing maximal resection conferred a survival benefit, whilst older age and multi-focal disease were associated with a poorer prognosis.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter cross-sectional analytical retrospective study. PURPOSE: To assess functional outcome (FO) after a spinal meningioma (SM) surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: All studies report functional improvement after SM removal. METHODS: We performed an analytical retrospective cohort study at five different institutions. All patients with a diagnosis of SM were included in this study, including those with recurrent tumors. Meningiomas of the foramen magnum were excluded. Useful histopathological characteristics were separately extracted. Surgical resection was evaluated according to the Simpson grading scale. Patient outcomes and clinical states were assessed with the help of their medical records using four different scales: the modified Ranawat score, the Nurick scale, the Prolo score, the Frankel grade, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-World Health Organization- Zubrod score. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 2018, 417 patients were identified, of which 85.8% were female. The median age at surgery was 67.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56.7-76.5). The lesion was located in the thoracic region in 77.9% of the patients, cervical region in 16.8%, and lumbar region in 4.1%. Surgical resection was complete in 95.5% of the cases. Only 0.96% of the patients died within the first postoperative month. Neurological status, which improved in 76.9% of the patients, was unchanged in 17.5% and even worsened in 4.4%. Functional status was assessed using the Ranawat score and Nurick scale, with scores of 1 (IQR, 0-2) (i.e., hyperreflexia and asymptomatic; mean, 1.3±1.3) and 1 (IQR, 0-2) (i.e., signs of spinal cord disease, but no difficulty in walking; mean, 1.2±1.4), respectively. Approximately 10.1% of the patients were not ambulant at the last neurosurgical follow-up visit. Older age at surgery was not significantly associated with a chair-bound status (p =0.427). CONCLUSIONS: This large series confirms the favorable FO after spinal meningioma surgery even in the case of seriously impaired preoperative status. A validated scale is needed to assess the factors predicting a worsening of the functional status and guide the management of patients.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional nationwide descriptive observational and analytic retrospective study. PURPOSE: This study aims to describe and assess survival after spinal meningioma (SM) surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: A few studies report a reduced survival after SM surgery. METHODS: The current study processed the Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS), the French national administrative medical database, to retrieve appropriate cases. RESULTS: This study identified 2,844 patients (79.1% females) between 2008 and 2017. The median age at surgery was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56-75 years). Moreover, 95.9% of SMs were removed through posterior or posterolateral approaches, and 6.9% were epidural and 0.7% needed an associated spine stabilization. Benign meningioma represented 92.9%, with 5% and 2.1% atypical and malignant, respectively. The median follow-up was 3.3 years (IQR, 3.1-3.5 years). Of the patients, 0.25% and 1.2% expired within a month and a year of surgery, respectively. At data collection, 225 patients (7.9%) expired. The 5-year overall survival (OS) probability was 90.1% (95% CI, 88.6%-91.7%). However, absolute excess risk of mortality after SM surgery was null, and the related standardized mortality ratio was 1 (95% CI, 0.9-1.2; p =0.565). In the adjusted regression, age at surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07; p <0.001), level of comorbidities (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.34-1.54; p <0.001), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2; HR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.28-10.39; p =0.0152), epidural SM (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09-2.75; p =0.0206), and malignant meningioma (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.51-4.61; p <0.001) remained significantly associated to a reduced OS. CONCLUSIONS: The SNDS is of great value in assessing SM incidence, associated mortality, and its predictors. OS after meningioma surgery is favorable but may be impaired for NF2 or older patients with a high level of comorbidities, epidural tumor, and malignant histopathology. SM surgery is not associated with an increased absolute excess mortality risk despite being performed on even more senior patients compared with intracranial meningioma.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies on meningioma are reported with inadequate allowance for competing causes of progression or death. The aim of this study was to describe the outcome of patients with intracranial WHO grade I meningioma and identify factors that may influence disease progression and cause-specific survival. METHODS: Pathology reports and clinical data of 505 WHO grade I meningiomas treated between January 2003 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. We estimated a cumulative incidence function for progression and cause-specific mortality. A competing risk analysis was conducted on clinical and histological criteria. Median follow-up was 6.2 years. RESULTS: A total of 530 surgical resections were performed on 505 cases. Forty-one patients received radiotherapy (RT). At data collection, 84 patients had died of their meningioma disease or demonstrated a recurrence eventually treated by redo surgery or RT. The risks of recurrence or meningioma-related death at 5 years were 16.2%, 95%CI[12.5, 20], whereas 5-year overall survival was 86.1%, 95%CI[82.8, 89.6]. In the multivariable Fine-Gray regression for a competing risk model, venous sinus invasion (SHR = 1.8, 95%CI[1.1, 2.9], p0.028), extent of resection (SHR = 0.2, 95%CI[0.1, 0.3], p < 0.001), and progressing meningioma (SHR = 7, 95%CI[3.3, 14.8], p < 0.001) were established as independent prognostic factors of cause-specific death or meningioma progression. In contrast, age at diagnosis < 65 years (HR = 1.1, 95%CI[1, 1.1], p < 0.001) and redo surgery for meningioma recurrence (HR = 2.6, 95%CI[1.4, 5], p = 0.00252) were predictors of the overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this large series, WHO grade I meningioma treatment failure correlated with venous sinus invasion, incomplete resection, and progressing tumour; shorter survival correlated with increased age and redo surgery for recurrence. We recommend the cumulative incidence competing risk approach in WHO grade I meningioma studies where unrelated mortality may be substantial, as this approach results in more accurate estimates of disease risk and associated predictors.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In contrast to benign meningiomas, malignant meningiomas (MM) are rare and associated with an unfavourable prognosis. Reports on MM concern fairly small cohorts, often comprising less than 30 cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome MM and identify factors that may influence survival. METHODS: Pathology reports and clinical data of 178 patients treated between 1989 and 2017 for a MM at 6 different international institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-six patients (42.7%) had a previous history of grade I or grade II meningioma. The patients underwent a total of 380 surgical resections and 72.5% received radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 4.5 yr. RESULTS: At data collection, 111 patients were deceased (63.4%) and only 23 patients (13.7%) were alive without any residual tumor on the most recent scan. Median overall survival was 2.9 yr, 95% confidence interval [CI; 2.4, 4.5]. Overall survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 yr, respectively, were: 77.7%, 95% CI [71.6, 84.3], 40%, 95% CI [32.7, 49], and 27.9%, 95% CI [20.9, 37.3]. In the multivariable analysis, age at MM surgery <65 yr (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44, 95% CI [0.29, 0.67], P < .001), previous benign or atypical meningioma surgery (HR = 1.9, 95% CI [1.23, 2.92], P = .004), completeness of resection (HR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.34, 0.78], P = .002), and adjuvant radiotherapy (HR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.42, 0.98], P = .039) were established as independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSION: This large series confirms the poor prognosis associated with MM, the treatment of which remains challenging. Patients under 65-yr-old with primary MM may live longer after complete resection and postoperative radiotherapy. Even with aggressive treatments, local control remains difficult to achieve.
