Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 46(1): 203-10, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11751135

ABSTRACT

An in vitro pharmacodynamic investigation was conducted to explore whether the area under the concentration time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24))/MIC ratio could predict fluoroquinolone performance against Bacteroides fragilis. An in vitro model was used to generate kill curves for trovafloxacin (TVA) and levofloxacin (LVX) at AUC(0-24)/MIC ratios of 1 to 406 against three strains of B. fragilis (ATCC 25285, ATCC 23745, and clinical isolate M97-117). TVA and LVX were bolused prior to the start of experiments to achieve the corresponding AUC(0-24)/MIC ratio. Experiments were performed in duplicate over 24 h and in an anaerobic environment. Analyses of antimicrobial performance were conducted by comparing the rates of bacterial kill (K) using nonlinear regression analysis with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was defined as a lack of overlap in the 95% confidence limits generated from the slope of each kill curve. For both TVA and LVX, K was maximized once an AUC(0-24)/MIC ratio of > or =40 was achieved and was not further increased despite a 10-fold increase in AUC(0-24)/MIC from approximately 40 to 400 against all three strains of B. fragilis. No significant differences were found in K between AUC(0-24)/MIC ratios of approximately 40 to 200. In experiments where AUC(0-24)/MIC ratios that were > or = 5 and < or = 44 were conducted, 64% demonstrated regrowth at 24 h. Resistant strains were selected in 50% of those experiments, demonstrating regrowth, which resulted in increased MICs of two- to 16-fold for both TVA and LVX. Regrowth did not occur, nor were resistant strains selected in any studies with an AUC/MIC that was > 44. Our findings suggest that fluoroquinolones provide antibacterial effects against B. fragilis in a concentration-independent manner associated with an AUC(0-24)/MIC ratio of > or =40. Also, the potential for the selection of resistant strains of B. fragilis may increase with an AUC(0-24)/MIC ratio of < or =44.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Bacteroides fragilis/drug effects , Fluoroquinolones , Levofloxacin , Naphthyridines/pharmacology , Ofloxacin/pharmacology , Area Under Curve , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Time Factors
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 45(10): 2936-8, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11557496

ABSTRACT

In an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, a twice-daily cefdinir dosing regimen was more effective than a once-daily regimen against common bacterial respiratory pathogens in producing 3-log(10) killing and preventing the occurrence of regrowth at 24 h. Twice-daily administration is likely the more appropriate cefdinir dosing strategy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cephalosporins/administration & dosage , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cefdinir , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Haemophilus influenzae/drug effects , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects , Streptococcus pyogenes/drug effects
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 45(7): 2136-40, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11408238

ABSTRACT

This investigation explored pharmacodynamic characteristics of fluoroquinolones against Bacteroides thetaiotamicron and the potential for development of resistance. An in vitro model was used to generate kill curves with three fluoroquinolones at various area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratios. Concentration-independent killing was observed. Increases in MICs were noted following exposure to fluoroquinolones at AUC/MIC ratios of 6 to 14.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Bacteroides/drug effects , Fluoroquinolones , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Levofloxacin , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Naphthyridines/pharmacology , Ofloxacin/pharmacology , Time Factors
4.
Pharmacotherapy ; 21(12): 1479-85, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11765301

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of single daily dosing (SDD) versus conventional dosing of gentamicin when administered with penicillin to treat enterococcal infections. DESIGN: In vitro pharmacodynamic model. SETTING: Hospital laboratory. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A 24-hour in vitro pharmacodynamic model was employed to simulate SDD and 3 times/day dosing of gentamicin, in conjunction with continuously infused penicillin, against Enterococcus faecalis. Duplicate 24-hour kill curves were generated with varying concentrations of penicillin and gentamicin alone and in combination. No difference in the rate of kill was seen between any combination of penicillin and gentamicin. Regrowth occurred only with drug combinations in which penicillin was administered continuously at the minimum inhibitory concentration. Variations in the gentamicin dosing regimen did not affect regrowth. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of enterococcal infections, an SDD regimen for gentamicin shows no efficacy benefit compared with conventional dosing.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Penicillins/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
5.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 43(9): 2251-5, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10471574

ABSTRACT

In vitro pharmacodynamic studies investigating the antimicrobial properties of five fluoroquinolones, (trovafloxacin, sparfloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin) against Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 23745 were conducted. The times required to reduce the viable counts by 3 log units were as follows: clinafloxacin, 2.9 h; levofloxacin, 4.6 h; trovafloxacin, 6 h; and sparfloxacin, 10 h. Exposure to ciprofloxacin did not achieve a 3-log decrease in viable counts. The susceptibility of B. fragilis was determined both prior to exposure and following 24 h of exposure to each of the five fluoroquinolones tested. The MICs of clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, and clindamycin were determined by the broth microdilution method. The MICs for B. fragilis preexposure were as follows: clinafloxacin, 0.25 microg/ml; trovafloxacin, 0.5 microg/ml; sparfloxacin, 2 microg /ml; levofloxacin, 2 microg/ml; and ciprofloxacin, 8 microg/ml. Similar pre- and postexposure MICs were obtained for cultures exposed to trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. However, following 24 h of exposure to sparfloxacin, a fluoroquinolone-resistant strain emerged. The MICs for this strain were as follows: clinafloxacin, 1 microg/ml; trovafloxacin, 4 microg/ml; sparfloxacin, 16 microg/ml; levofloxacin, 16 microg/ml; and ciprofloxacin, 32 microg/ml. No changes in the susceptibility of B. fragilis pre- and postexposure to sparfloxacin were noted for metronidazole (MIC, 1 microg/ml), cefoxitin (MIC, 4 microg /ml), chloramphenicol (MIC, 4 microg/ml), and clindamycin (MIC, 0.06 microg/ml). Resistance remained stable as the organism was passaged on antibiotic-free agar for 10 consecutive days. Mutant B. fragilis strains with decreased susceptibility to clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin were selected on brucella blood agar containing 8x the MIC of levofloxacin at a frequencies of 6.4 x 10(-9), 4x the MICs of trovafloxacin and sparfloxacin at frequencies of 2.2 x 10(-9) and 3. 3 x 10(-10), respectively, and 2x the MIC of clinafloxacin at a frequency of 5.5 x 10(-11); no mutants were selected with ciprofloxacin. The susceptibilities of strains to trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, clinafloxacin, sparfloxacin, and ciprofloxacin before and after exposure to sparfloxacin were modestly affected by the presence of reserpine (20 microg/ml), an inhibitor of antibiotic efflux. The mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance is being explored, but it is unlikely to be efflux due to a lack of cross-resistance to unrelated antimicrobial agents and to the fact that the MICs for strains before and after exposure to sparfloxacin are minimally affected by reserpine.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Bacteroides fragilis/drug effects , Fluoroquinolones , Area Under Curve , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
6.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 40(3): 627-32, 1996 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8851583

ABSTRACT

Several investigators have suggested that the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio (AUC/MIC24 or AUIC24) can be used to make comparisons of antimicrobial activity between fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Limited data exist regarding the generic predictive ability of AUC/MIC24 for the antimicrobial effects of fluoroquinolones. The purposes of the present investigation were to determine if the AUC/MIC24 can be used as a generic outcome predictor of fluoroquinolone antibacterial activity and to determine if a similar AUC/MIC24 breakpoint can be established for different fluoroquinolones. Using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model, 29 duplicate concentration time-kill curve experiments simulated AUC/MIC24s ranging from 52 to 508 SIT-1.h (inverse serum inhibitory titer integrated over time) with ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin against three strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Each 24-h experiment was performed in cation-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth with a starting inoculum of 10(6) CFU/ml. At timed intervals cation-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth samples were collected for CFU and fluoroquinolone concentration determinations. Transformation of bacterial counts into the cumulative bacterial effect parameter of the 24-h area under the effect curve (AUEC24) was performed for each concentration time-kill curve. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare pharmacodynamic predictors (AUC/MIC24, 24-h AUC, peak concentration [Cmax] to MIC ratios [Cmax:MIC], etc.) with ln AUEC24. To identify threshold breakpoint AUC/MIC24s, AUEC24s were stratified by the magnitude of AUC/MIC24 into subgroups, which were analyzed for differences in antibacterial effect. The Kruskal-Wallis test and subsequent Tukey's multiple comparison test were used to determine which AUC/MIC subgroups were significantly different. Multiple regression analysis revealed that only AUC/MIC24 (r2 = 0.65) and MIC (r2 = 0.03) were significantly correlated with antibacterial effect. At similar AUC/MIC24s, yet different MICs, Cmaxs, or elimination half-lives, the AUEC24s were similar for both fluoroquinolones. The relationship between AUC/MIC24 and ln AUEC24 was best described by a sigmoidal maximal antimicrobial effect (Emax) model (r2 = 0.72; Emax = 9.1; AUC/MIC50 = 119 SIT-1.h; S = 2.01 [S is an exponent that reflects the degree of sigmoidicity]). Ciprofloxacin-bacteria AUC/MIC24 values of < 100 SIT-1.h were significantly different (P < 0.05) from the AUC/MIC24 values of > 100 SIT-1.h. An ofloxacin AUC/MIC24 of > 100 SIT-1.h and an AUC/MIC24 of < 100 SIT-1.h exhibited a trend toward a significant difference (P > 0.05 but < 0.1). The inverse relationship between drug exposure and MIC increase postexposure was described by a sigmoidal fixed Emax model (AUC/MIC24, r2 = 0.40; AUC/MIC50 = 95 SIT-1.h; S = 1.97; Cmax:MIC, r2 = 0.41; Cmax:MIC50 = 7.3; S = 2.01). These data suggest that AUC/MIC24 may be the most descriptive measurement of fluoroquinolone antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa, that ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin have similar AUC/MIC24 threshold breakpoints at approximately 100 SIT-1.h, that the concentration-dependent selection of resistant organisms may parallel the threshold breakpoint of the antimicrobial effect, and that AUC/MIC24 generically describes the antibacterial effects of different fluoroquinolones.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacokinetics , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacokinetics , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , Kinetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Models, Biological , Ofloxacin/pharmacokinetics , Ofloxacin/pharmacology , Regression Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL