Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) ; 104: 1-32, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21125770

ABSTRACT

Rapidly rising health insurance costs have strained U.S. families and employers in recent years. This issue brief examines data for all states on changes in private employer premiums and deductibles for 2003 and 2009. The analysis finds that premiums for businesses and their employees increased 41 percent across states from 2003 to 2009, while per-person deductibles jumped 77 percent in large as well as small firms. If these trends continue at the rate prior to enactment of the Affordable Care Act, the average premium for family coverage will rise 79 percent by 2020, to more than $23,000. The authors describe how health reform offers the potential to reduce insurance cost growth while improving value and protection. If reforms succeed in slowing premium growth by 1 percentage point annually in all states, by 2020 employers and families together will save $2,323 annually for family coverage, compared with projected trends.


Subject(s)
Cost Control/trends , Deductibles and Coinsurance/trends , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/trends , Health Care Reform/trends , Insurance Benefits/trends , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economics , Cost Control/economics , Cost Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost Savings/economics , Cost Savings/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost Savings/trends , Deductibles and Coinsurance/economics , Deductibles and Coinsurance/legislation & jurisprudence , Forecasting , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform/economics , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Insurance Benefits/economics , Insurance Benefits/legislation & jurisprudence , State Government , United States
2.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 28(1): w1-16, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19008253

ABSTRACT

This 2008 survey of chronically ill adults in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States finds major differences among countries in access, safety, and care efficiency. U.S. patients were at particularly high risk of forgoing care because of costs and of experiencing inefficient, poorly organized care, or errors. The Dutch, who have a strong primary care infrastructure, report notably positive access and coordination experiences. Still, deficits in care management during hospital discharge or when seeing multiple doctors occurred in all countries. Findings highlight the need for system innovations to improve outcomes for patients with complex chronic conditions.


Subject(s)
Developed Countries , Health Services Needs and Demand , Patient Satisfaction , Aged , Chronic Disease/therapy , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index
3.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 25(6): w457-75, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16987933

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the findings of a new scorecard designed to assess and monitor multiple domains of U.S. health system performance. The scorecard uses national and international data to identify performance benchmarks and calculates simple ratio scores comparing U.S averages to benchmarks. Average ratio scores range from 51 to 71 across domains of health outcomes, quality, access, equity, and efficiency. The overall picture that emerges from the scorecard is one of missed opportunities and room for improvement. The findings underscore the importance of policies that take a coherent, whole-system approach to change and address the interaction of access, quality, and cost.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Health Services Research , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Continuity of Patient Care , Efficiency, Organizational , Health Policy , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Internationality , Reimbursement Mechanisms , Social Justice , Social Responsibility , United States
4.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) ; (841): 1-12, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16193606

ABSTRACT

The Commonwealth Fund Survey of Older Adults reveals that adults ages 50 to 70 who rely on the individual insurance market for health coverage pay much higher premiums than their counterparts with employer coverage or Medicare. The survey found that in 2004, more than half (54%) of older adults with individual coverage spent $3,600 or more annually on premiums. A quarter (26%) spent $6,000 or more a year. In contrast, only 17 percent of older adults with employer coverage and 6 percent of those covered by Medicare spent $3,600 or more on premiums. Moreover, individual coverage often provides poor access to care and entails high out-of-pocket expenses for older adults, making it a particularly unaffordable option for people who are older, have low incomes, or who have chronic health problems.


Subject(s)
Aged , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Insurance, Health/economics , Medicare/economics , Middle Aged , Private Sector/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Deductibles and Coinsurance , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services , United States
5.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) ; (748): 1-8, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15137394

ABSTRACT

A 2003 Commonwealth Fund/Health Research and Educational Trust survey of 576 New York State firms found that, in order to manage rising health costs, employers are increasing the share of the insurance premium that employees pay, delaying the start of benefits, and increasing cost-sharing at the point of service. This has enabled employers to preserve health benefits, but has raised costs for workers and their families. On average, workers' contributions for family coverage rose 54 percent, from $1,392 per year in 2001 to $2,148 per year in 2003. During that time period, fewer workers selected family coverage. Employers are receptive to a wide range of approaches to make coverage more available and affordable for their employees, but they have limited familiarity with public programs that could cover their lower-wage workers, such as Healthy New York, Family Health Plus, or Child Health Plus.


Subject(s)
Cost Sharing/statistics & numerical data , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical data , Cost Control , Cost Sharing/economics , Cost Sharing/trends , Deductibles and Coinsurance/economics , Deductibles and Coinsurance/statistics & numerical data , Deductibles and Coinsurance/trends , Forecasting , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/trends , Health Surveys , Humans , New York
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...