Performance of Verigene Rapid Diagnostic Testing for Detection of Inpatient Pediatric Bacteremia.

OBJECTIVE: Verigene blood culture panels comprise rapid diagnostic testing, which aids in early bacteremia species identification. This study determined the concordance of Verigene rapid diagnostic results compared with the Vitek reference standard in patients admitted to a children's hospital. METHODS: This was a 3-year retrospective observational study of neonatal and pediatric patients ≤18 years admitted to a children's hospital with confirmed bacteremia for whom Verigene testing was performed. Verigene testing was conducted on cultures with reported growth on Gram stain and final organism speciation confirmed via Vitek. Percent concordance and positive percent agreement with 95% CIs were calculated for Verigene panel-identifiable organisms. Negative percent agreement with 95% CIs was calculated for non-panel organisms. Time-to-result was calculated from Gram stain reporting to both Verigene and Vitek final organism susceptibility. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five Gram-positive (GP) and 51 Gram-negative (GN) isolates were identified through Vitek. Verigene GP panel-detectable organisms were correctly identified 96.9% (125/129) at the genus level and 95.3% (123/129) at the species level. Overall positive percent agreement was 95.3 (CI: 90.2-98.3). Negative percent agreement was 83.3 (CI: 35.9-99.6) for the 6 non-panel GP organisms. All GN isolates were correctly identified on Verigene. Median time-to-result was 2.9 hours (IQR 2.6, 3.2) and 44.4 hours (IQR: 35.4, 52.5) for Verigene and final susceptibilities, respectively. There was a statistically significant time savings of 41.5 hours (CI: 29.8-53.2) for identification and detection of resistance markers (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Verigene concordance at our institution aligns with results from previously published studies and can be considered a reliable clinical decision-support tool.

Risk Factors for Hypoglycemia with the Use of Enteral Glyburide in Neurocritical Care Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous glyburide has demonstrated safety when used for attenuation of cerebral edema, although safety data are lacking for enteral glyburide when used for this indication. We aimed to determine the prevalence of and risk factors for hypoglycemia in neurocritical care patients receiving enteral glyburide. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control chart review (hypoglycemia vs. no hypoglycemia) of adult patients who received enteral glyburide for prevention or treatment of cerebral or spinal cord edema. Hypoglycemia was defined as a blood glucose <55.8 mg/dL. Descriptive statistics were used, with multivariate analysis to measure the association of risk factors and outcomes. Logistic regression was applied to outcomes with an exposure. Potential confounders were evaluated using the t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables, and the χ2 test or the Fisher exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (60.6% men, median age 60 years) were included. The majority received 2.5 mg of enteral glyburide twice daily. Diagnoses included tumors (35.2%), intracerebral hemorrhage (28.2%), postspinal surgery (12.7%), and ischemic stroke (12.7%). Hypoglycemia occurred in 17 (23.9%) patients. Multivariate analysis identified admission serum creatinine (odds ratio, 27.2; [1.661, 445.3]; P < 0.05) as a risk factor for hypoglycemia, whereas body mass index >30 (odds ratio, 0.085; [0.008, 0.921]; P < 0.05) was protective. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoglycemic episodes are common following enteral glyburide in neurocritical care patients. Both patients with and without diabetes mellitus are at risk of hypoglycemia. Elevated admission serum creatinine may increase the risk of hypoglycemia when utilizing glyburide for prevention or treatment of cerebral or spinal cord edema.

Implementation of systematic progression of community pharmacy-based prescription verification into the skills-based laboratory curriculum.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To describe the design, implementation, and evaluation of systematic progressive community pharmacy-based prescription verification activities across a skills-based laboratory course series. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Community pharmacy-based prescription verification activities were implemented into three laboratory courses, Abilities Lab (ABL) 1, 2, and 4. During each activity, students practiced prescription verification using a handout with two components. First, a checklist outlining an eight-step verification process serves as a student resource. In the second handout component, students are required to identify which step contains a prescription error(s), the appropriate pharmacist action, and the recommendation needed in order to correct the error(s). After verifying and completing the handout, the students participate in a facilitator-led discussion on the recommendations necessary to dispense the prescription. As students progressed through ABL 1, 2, and 4, both the error type and scope of the verification process expanded. Class verification exercises culminated in a final practical assessment at the end of each semester. FINDINGS: In ABL 1 students scored an average of 99.5% (n = 161, standard deviation (SD) = 1.92) on the final practical assessment. In ABL 2, students scored an average of 97.6% (n = 166, SD = 3.07). In ABL 4, students scored an average of 90.3% (n = 159, SD = 11.2). SUMMARY: This manuscript adds value to the current literature by describing the implementation of progressive community pharmacy-based prescription verification activities across a skills-based laboratory course series.

Toxicity of acute exploratory amphetamine-salt medication in amphetamine-naïve pediatrics: a retrospective cohort study.

Background and Objectives: Pediatric ingestions of amphetamines used in the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are on the rise. Little data provide an amphetamine dose at which to refer pediatric unintentional ingestions to a healthcare facility for monitoring. We studied the dose at which unintentional ingestions of amphetamines develop symptoms and receive benzodiazepines.Methods: We performed a retrospective study from a single poison center from 1/1/2005 through 11/30/2018. We included single substance ingestion of amphetamine salts to treat ADHD in amphetamine-naïve children age 0-12 years followed to a known outcome. Poison center documentation was reviewed for signs and symptoms related to amphetamine toxicity and use of benzodiazepines.Results: We screened 1,394 cases and 160 met inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 1.8 years and 55% were male. The median dose of symptomatic patients (1.38 mg/kg) was greater than those without symptoms (0.83 mg/kg). The median amphetamine dose of patients receiving benzodiazepines (1.58 mg/kg) was also greater than for patients not receiving benzodiazepines (1.0 mg/kg). A dose threshold of greater than 0.75 mg/kg was 100% sensitive and 36.8% specific for benzodiazepine administration and 93.9% sensitive and 47.4% specific for presence of any symptoms.Conclusions: The median dose of amphetamines ingested by patients receiving benzodiazepines was greater than those not receiving benzodiazepines. No child with a dose of ≤0.75 mg/kg received benzodiazepines. Prospective studies should be performed to assess triage guidelines and referral doses.

Beneficiary, Caregiver, and Case Manager Perspectives on the Medication Therapy Management Program Standardized Format.

Plan sponsors of Medicare Part D must provide beneficiaries who receive a comprehensive medication review (CMR) with a written summary using the Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management Standardized Format (SF). The SF is a means to advance consistency in the CMR program by providing a template of expected content. However, barriers remain with beneficiary use and integration into existing electronic health records. The current study assessed Medicare beneficiary, caregiver, and case manager perceptions of the SF through five focus group interviews with a total of 23 participants. Qualitative analysis found that beneficiaries and case managers preferred a consolidated SF document to share and update their entire health care team. Beneficiaries suggested adding information to the SF on dosage, timing, drug interactions, cost, and less expensive alternatives. Identifying elements of the SF that are perceived as useful to beneficiaries will allow for a more streamlined SF that may enhance interoperability among the health care team. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(4), 7-13.].