The association of patient age, race, and demographic features on reported pain and sedation dosing during procedural abortion: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore impact of age, racial, demographic, and psychosocial factors on patients' dosage of analgesia and maximum pain score during procedural abortion. STUDY DESIGN: We performed retrospective chart review of pregnant individuals undergoing procedural abortion at our hospital-based abortion clinic from October 2019 through May 2020. Patients were stratified into age groups,<19 years, 19 to 35 years, and>35 years. We conducted the Kruskal-Wallis H test to evaluate for medication dosing or maximum pain score differences among groups. RESULTS: We included 225 patients in our study. We found no difference in fentanyl or midazolam dosing by age. The median fentanyl dose was 75 mcg and median midazolam dose was 2 mg in all three groups (p = 0.61, p = 0.99). White patients received higher median midazolam dosing than Black patients (2 and 3 mg, respectively, p < 0.01) despite similar pain scores. Despite no difference in pain scores, patients terminating for genetic anomaly received more fentanyl than those terminating for socioeconomic reasons (75 and 100 mcg, respectively, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In our limited study, we found that White race and induced abortion for genetic anomaly were associated with increased medication dosing, though age was not. Multiple demographic and psychosocial factors, as well as perhaps provider bias, play into both a patient's perception of pain and the dosage of fentanyl and midazolam they receive during abortion procedures. IMPLICATIONS: By acknowledging both patient factors and provider biases in medication dosing, we can provide more equitable abortion care.

Real-world implementation of a vaginal preparation policy prior to cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major source of morbidity and mortality for women who undergo cesarean section (c-section). SSIs following c-section include wound infection, infection of the endometrium (endometritis) and intra-abdominal infections. Perioperative interventions to prevent these infections continue to be studied, including the use of vaginal preparation prior to c-section. Although literature has shown that the use of vaginal preparation prior to c-section decreases the rate of SSI, real-world clinical data regarding effective implementation of these policies are lacking. The objectives of this study were to determine (1) if a vaginal preparation policy could be implemented in a real-world setting with a high compliance rate and (2) to identify factors led to differences in compliance with policy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study designed to examine the incidence of SSI after c-section before and after the implementation of vaginal preparation policy. The primary outcomes included implementation rates of the vaginal preparation for the post policy cohort. Secondary outcomes included subgroup analysis of policy adherence based on time of day, urgency of delivery, membrane status, labor status, and maternal factors. RESULTS: Overall adherence to the vaginal preparation policy was 87.2% of patients. Maternal factors did not impact the rate of policy adherence. 81.4% of patients undergoing c-section at night had vaginal prep completed compared to 89.9% of patients undergoing c-section during the day (p = .016). 63.8% of patients undergoing emergent c-section had vaginal prep completed, compared to 90.1% of patients undergoing non-emergent c-section (p < .001). Laboring patients were more likely to have vaginal preparation completed (143 (95.3%) vs. 225 (82.7%), p = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with vaginal preparation policy was high. Patients who are undergoing evening deliveries and emergent deliveries are less likely to have vaginal preparation completed. Some of these differences are likely attributable to perceived urgency of the c-section. It is important that interventions are identified such as staff education and standardization of documentation to improve rates of policy adherence.